SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 49628/13
Manuel José ALMEIDA CABRAL and Maria Dolores ALMEIDA CABRAL
against Portugal
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 28 January 2014 as a Committee composed of:
Dragoljub Popović, President,
Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,
Helen Keller, judges,
and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 July 2013,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicants, Mr Manuel José Almeida Cabral and Ms Maria Dolores Almeida Cabral, are Portuguese nationals, who were born in 1945 and 1924 respectively and live in Aveiras de Baixo and Santiago de Cassurrães (Portugal). They were represented before the Court by Mr H. Baptista, a lawyer practising in Sesimbra (Portugal).
The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M. F. da Graça Carvalho, Deputy Attorney General.
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of administrative proceedings to which they were parties.
On 29 October and 5 December 2013 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Portugal in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay them EUR 9,400 euros (nine thousand four hundred euros) to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Stanley Naismith Dragoljub Popović
RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy