Resolution CM/ResDH(2012)89[1]
Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
26 cases against Hungary
Case, Application No.
Date of decision
Balint Toth, application No 60380/08
29/03/2011
Balogh and Rafael, application No 44062/08
10/05/2011
Bard, application No 14134/06
09/11/2010
Betty Bau KFT, application No 57119/10
10/05/2011
Boly Es Videke Takarekszovetkezet, application No 39870/07
18/01/2011
Brezovszki, application No 46959/08
15/03/2011
Farkasne Furulyas, application No 24767/08
15/03/2011
Futura Plusz Kft., application No 39864/08
30/08/2011
Jozsef and Jozsefne Kovacs, application No 8666/08
13/09/2011
Kiraly, application No 53402/07
15/03/2011
Kocsis, application No 12926/08
15/03/2011
Kollar, application No 32251/08
13/09/2011
Kormanik, application No 37905/08
29/03/2011
Laszlone Fodor, application No 52355/07
28/09/2010
Ledniczky, application No 11124/08
15/03/2011
Matusichne Vizvari, application No 8232/07
14/12/2010
Palasthy, application No 39508/10
15/03/2011
Pappne Takacs, application No 49392/07
28/09/2010
Polinger, application No 49153/07
18/01/2011
Prohaszka, application No 19029/08
10/05/2011
Rosta, application No 19049/08
15/03/2011
Seres and Szikora, application No 54421/08
24/05/2011
Szabone Pakozdi, application No 931/08
29/03/2011
Szentivanszki, application No 23374/07
12/10/2010
Tatay, application No 39449/08
29/03/2011
Tisza-Tavi Kft., application No 49962/08
13/09/2011
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously, to strike these cases out of its list;
Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly-settlements were executed by the respondent State,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and
DECIDES to close their examination.
[1] Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 June 2012 at the 1144th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy