Published on 11 December 2023
SECOND SECTION
Application no. 10410/20
Levent BAYRAM against Türkiye
and 5 other applications
(see list appended)
communicated on 20 November 2023
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
The applications concern the refusal of the domestic authorities to grant the applicants, who were detained at the time of the events, permission to receive visits from their school-age children during the weekends.
The applicants complain of a violation of their rights under Article 8 of the Convention.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of the impugned restrictions on weekend visits (see Subaşı and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 3468/20 and 18 others, §§ 77-79, 6 December 2022)?
2. If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2 of the Convention? In particular, did the domestic authorities make a concrete assessment of the applicants’ needs and engage with their complaints in accordance with the guarantees inherent in Article 8 of the Convention (ibid., §§ 80-93)?
ANNEX
List of applications
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Represented by
1.
10410/20
Bayram v. Türkiye
04/02/2020
Levent BAYRAM
1973
Ülkü BAYRAM (not lawyer)
2.
21237/20
Demir v. Türkiye
29/04/2020
Selçuk DEMİR
1980
3.
33063/20
Ayar v. Türkiye
09/06/2020
Adem AYAR
1979
4.
33175/20
Hazar v. Türkiye
24/07/2020
Halil HAZAR
1983
5.
34920/20
Patırgan v. Türkiye
27/07/2020
Uğur PATIRGAN
1977
6.
38022/20
Bulut v. Türkiye
04/08/2020
Ahmet BULUT
1980
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy