THIRD SECTION
FINAL DECISION
Application no. 43372/98
by Kadir BOR and Others
against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 23 October 2003 as a Chamber composed of:
MrG. Ress, President,
MrI. Cabral Barreto,
MrL. Caflisch,
MrR. Türmen,
MrB. Zupančič,
MrsH.S. Greve,
MrK. Traja, judges,
and Mr V. Berger, Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 21 July 1998,
Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court,
Having regard to the partial decision of 23 November 1999,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case submitted by the applicants and the Government on 9 September 2002 and 15 July 2003 respectively,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
THE FACTS
The applicants, Kadir Bor, Hasan Bor, Mehmet Bor, Sellüme Bor (Öz), Nuri Bor, Ömer Bor, Şerif Bor, Ali Çayan, İbrahim Hıdıroğlu, Isa Kaya, Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan), Ahmet Özavcı and Münire Özel, are Turkish nationals. They were represented before the Court by Mr A. Akıllıoğlu and Mr A. Aktay, lawyers practising in Ankara.
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
The General Directorate of National Roads and Highways expropriated plots of land belonging to the applicants in Tarsus in order to build the Tarsus -İçel - Çukurova - İskenderun Motorway. A committee of experts assessed the value of the plots of land belonging to the applicants and these amounts were paid to them when the expropriation took place.
Following the applicants’ requests for increased compensation, the national courts awarded them additional compensation plus an interest at the statutory rate of 30 % per annum. The applicants appealed and the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the first instance court. In the beginning of 1998 the due amounts were paid to the applicants respectively.
Details are indicated in the table below:
NAMES OF THE APPLICANTS
DATE OF TRANSFER OF TITLE DEED TO THE LAND
DATE OF FINAL DECISION BY COURT OF CASSATION AS REGARDS ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION
(interests and legal costs are not included)
(in turkish liras)
DATE OF PAYMENT
1. Kadir BOR
Hasan BOR
Mehmet BOR
Sellüme BOR (Öz)
Nuri BOR
Ömer BOR
Şerif BOR
01.04.1992
06.06.1994
240.438.500
26.01.1998
2. Ali ÇAYAN
İbrahim HIDIROĞLU
15.10.1992
02.05.1994
206.000.000
26.01.1998
3. İsa KAYA
Havva KAYA (Kayaaslan)
24.01.1992
25.05.1993
223.646.883
26.01.1998
4.Ahmet ÖZAVCI
01.09.1993
07.11.1994
135.454.450
26.01.1998
5.Münire ÖZEL
25.10.1992
18.09.1995
48.000.000
06.02.1998
COMPLAINTS
The applicants allege that the rate of interest applied in the calculation of the additional compensation for expropriation was too low. They also complain of the delays in obtaining their compensation. In this regard they invoke Article 1 of Protocol No 1 and Article 6 of the Convention.
THE LAW
Following informal contacts between the applicant’s and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter. As a result, the Registrar addressed draft declarations to the parties.
The Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“I declare that the Government of Turkey offer to pay 49,500 (forty-nine thousand five hundred) euros to Mr Kadir Bor, Mr Hasan Bor, Mr Mehmet Bor, Ms Sellüme Bor (Öz), Mr Nuri Bor, Mr Ömer Bor, Mr Şerif Bor, Mr Ali Çayan, Mr İbrahim Hıdıroğlu, Mr İsa Kaya, Ms Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan), Mr Ahmet Özavcı and Ms Münire Özel[1] with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the application registered under no. 43372/98. This sum shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and will be divided up as follows:
Mr Kadir Bor, Mr Hasan Bor, Mr Mehmet Bor, Ms Sellüme Bor (Öz), Mr Nuri Bor, Mr Ömer Bor, Mr Şerif Bor 11,700 EUR
Mr Ali Çayan, Mr İbrahim Hıdıroğlu9,500 EUR
Mr İsa Kaya, Ms Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan)23,800 EUR
Mr Ahmet Özavcı3,500 EUR
Ms Münire Özel1,000 EUR
This sum will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court ... This sum shall be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”
The Court received the following declaration from one of the representatives of the applicants:
“I note that the Government of Turkey are prepared to pay the sum of 49,500 (forty-nine thousand five hundred) euros covering pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs to Mr Kadir Bor, Mr Hasan Bor, Mr Mehmet Bor, Ms Sellüme Bor (Öz), Mr Nuri Bor, Mr Ömer Bor, Mr Şerif Bor, Mr Ali Çayan, Mr İbrahim Hıdıroğlu, Mr İsa Kaya, Ms Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan), Mr Ahmet Özavcı and Ms Münire Özel with a view to securing a friendly settlement of application no. 43372/98 pending before the Court. This sum will be divided up as follows:
Mr Kadir Bor, Mr Hasan Bor, Mr Mehmet Bor, Ms Sellüme Bor (Öz), Mr Nuri Bor, Mr Ömer Bor, Mr Şerif Bor 11,700 EUR
Mr Ali Çayan, Mr İbrahim Hıdıroğlu9,500 EUR
Mr İsa Kaya, Ms Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan)23,800 EUR
Mr Ahmet Özavcı3,500 EUR
Ms Münire Özel1,000 EUR
I also note that this sum will be payable within three months from the date of the decision by the Court ... This sum shall be paid in euros to a bank account named by the applicants, free of any taxes and charges that may be applicable.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts of this application. I declare that this constitutes a final settlement of the case. This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicants have reached.”
After informing the Government, the Court took into consideration the applicant’s representative’s request of 9 September 2002 to make corrections to some of the applicants’ names.
The Court takes note of the agreement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols and considers that there is no reason which would justify the continuation of the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of the Court).
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to disjoin the applications;
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Vincent BergerGeorg Ress
RegistrarPresident
[1] Taking into consideration the letter sent by the applicant’s representative on 9 September 2002, the name of the applicants Sellüme Bor (Öz) and Havva Kaya (Kayaaslan), have been corrected.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy