Communicated on 3 June 2014
THIRD SECTION
Application no. 65916/10
Ali Nurdinovich IBRAGIMOV
against Slovakia
lodged on 15 November 2010
The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available in HUDOC.
QUESTION
Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaint under Article 3, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? In particular, has the renewed asylum request of the applicant met the criteria of quality, speediness and suspensive effect as required by Article 13 of the Convention in similar cases (see also the recapitulation of the relevant case-law in A.C. and Others v. Spain, no. 6528/11, §§ 87-89, 22 April 2014, with further references)?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy