Communicated on 3 September 2015
FIRST SECTION
Application no. 36303/10
C against the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
lodged on 23 June 2010
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The applicant is a public official who was born and lives in Skopje.
COMPLAINTS
The applicant complains under Article 6 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings, the non-enforcement of a final court judgment, the alleged lack of reasoning in the appellate court’s judgment of 3 December 2009 and the alleged judicial inconsistency. These proceedings concerned the applicant’s reassignment to different posts.
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES
1. Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the Skopje Court of First Instance’s judgment of 4 October 2007 enforced in practice? If not, was the non-enforcement of the decision compatible with the rights guaranteed under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
2. Did the Skopje Court of Appeal’s judgment of 3 December 2009 contain sufficient reasons, in particular for departing from the previous case-law as alleged by the applicant? In this respect, the Government are invited to inform the Court about the case-law developments prior to that judgment.
3. Was the length of the proceedings in the present case in breach of the “reasonable time” requirement of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy