Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)325
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
26 cases against the Republic of Moldova
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020
at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
7359/06
AGURDINO S.R.L.
27/09/2011
29/10/2013
27/12/2011
24/03/2014
28648/05
BANCA INTERNAŢIONALĂ DE INVESTIŢII ŞI DEZVOLTARE MB S.A.
16/10/2012
16/01/2013
7516/10
BODIU
18/06/2019
18/06/2019
42572/09
BRANTOM INTERNATIONAL S.R.L. AND OTHERS
10/02/2015
10/02/2015
6338/11
CARPOV
12/02/2019
12/02/2019
11712/04
CEACHIR
15/01/2008
15/04/2008
24042/09+
CEREALE FLOR S.A. AND ROȘCA
14/02/2017
14/02/2017
35251/04
COJOCARU
15/11/2011
15/11/2011
18081/07
COLESNIC
05/03/2019
05/03/2019
27773/05+
CONSOCIVIL S.A. AND ZELINSCHI
28/05/2019
28/05/2019
16974/15
CONSTRUCT CONFORT S.R.L.
28/05/2019
28/05/2019
25575/08
DRAGOSTEA COPIILOR - PETROVSCHI - NAGORNII
13/09/2011
10/06/2014
13/12/2011
10/09/2014
12918/12
ELECTRONSERVICE-NORD S.A.
02/07/2019
23/06/2020
02/07/2019
23/06/2020
75/07
EUGENIA AND DOINA DUCA
03/03/2009
08/04/2014
14/09/2009
08/07/2014
72636/13
FURTUNĂ
23/06/2020
23/06/2020
35367/08
IPTEH SA AND OTHERS
24/11/2009
29/06/2010
24/02/2010
29/10/2010
53773/00
ISTRATE
13/06/2006
13/09/2006
24446/09
IURII
13/12/2016
13/12/2016
28430/06
JOMIRU AND CREŢU
17/04/2012
17/04/2012
22820/09
LIPCAN
17/12/2013
17/12/2013
6923/03
MELNIC
14/11/2006
14/02/2007
30475/03
MOLDOVAHIDROMAS
27/02/2007
13/05/2008
27/05/2007
Friendly settlement
37225/07+
PIRNAU AND OTHERS
31/01/2012
31/01/2012
67576/10
PIETRIS S.A.
03/12/2013
03/12/2013
28439/05
SFINX-IMPEX S.A.
25/09/2012
25/012/2012
44721/08
STRUGARU
22/10/2013
22/10/2013
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the quashing of final domestic judgments in breach with the principle of legal certainty and the violation of the applicants’ property rights (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)1037);
Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the damages suffered by the applicants were covered by the just satisfaction awarded by the Court or redressed at the domestic level following the reopening of the impugned domestic proceedings;
Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Popov (no. 2) group of cases (Application No. 19960/04) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy