Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)127
Thirty one cases against Turkey
Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 June 2013,
at the 1174th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Case, Application No.
Date of decision
AKTAS, Application No. 21883/05
13/11/2012
AYGUL, Application No. 21884/05
13/11/2012
SAROHAN, Application No. 11980/07
13/11/2012
SOYTAS, Application No. 18328/07
15/06/2010
OZAN, Application No. 316/08
16/10/2012
ASLAN, Application No. 3401/08
06/07/2010
USTAOGLU, Application No. 16298/08
18/09/2012
OKSAS, Application No. 23646/08
16/10/2012
YOLDAS, Application No. 27097/08
04/09/2012
YAMALAK (10), Application No. 28212/08
18/09/2012
AKMAN, Application No. 43072/08
16/10/2012
ARANCAK, Application No. 8441/09
23/10/2012
SAHAP DOGAN, Application No. 10721/09
18/09/2012
OSME, Application No. 16817/09
23/10/2012
DEMIR, Application No. 22614/09
18/09/2012
EKMEZ, Application No. 28607/09
18/09/2012
OZ (2), Application No. 31459/09
18/09/2012
BAYAR, Application No. 36302/09
23/10/2012
OZTURK, Application No. 44584/09
18/09/2012
YILDIZ, Application No. 44648/09
16/10/2012
AKDEMIR, Application No. 59172/09
18/09/2012
DOGAN, Application No. 6370/10
04/09/2012
KETME, Application No. 17891/10
16/10/2012
ATSAK, Application No. 23600/10
13/11/2012
OZOGUL, Application No. 23610/10
02/10/2012
ACER, Application No. 28092/10
16/10/2012
GECER, Application No. 53959/10
16/10/2012
GUL, Application No. 16803/11
16/10/2012
ABDUKAYA, Application No. 25108/11
23/10/2012
DEMIR, Application No. 29978/11
18/09/2012
KUTLU, Application No. 73757/11
13/11/2012
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;
Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and
DECIDES to close their examination.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy