Resolution DH (2000) 62
concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
of 5 October 1999
in the case of Bagedda and Delogu against Italy
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 29 May 2000
at the 709th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Bagedda and Delogu case delivered on 5 October 1999 and transmitted on the same date to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;
Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 33992/96) against Italy, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 3 August 1996 under previous Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Bruno Bagedda and Mr Salvatore Delogu, Italian nationals, and that the Court, seized of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint relating to the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;
Whereas in its judgment of 5 October 1999 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the Government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided, unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;
Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Italy would pay each applicant, as soon as the judgment would be notified, the sum of 10 000 000 Italian lire in respect of damage and the sum of 3 000 000 Italian lire in respect of costs and expenses, namely the total sum of 26 000 000 Italian lire;
Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2 of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance or solution of the matter;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of previous Article 54 which are, for the time being, applicable by analogy to cases transmitted to it under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that on 10 February 2000, the Government of the respondent State had paid the applicants the sums provided for in the friendly settlement;
Recalling that, as regards the applicants’ complaint declared admissible in this case, the Committee of Ministers is at present supervising the execution of several judgments of the Court and of a considerable number of Committee of Ministers' decisions under previous Article 32 of the Convention, finding a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on account of the excessive length of proceedings before the Italian criminal courts;
Whereas, in this connection, the Italian authorities informed the Committee of Ministers that they were drafting and adopting new general measures in order to put an end to the serious problem of excessive length of proceedings, so as to prevent new violations similar to those already found in the above-mentioned cases,
Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Italy, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy