FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF BALYUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 22656/21 and 35 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 May 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Balyuk and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Mattias Guyomar,
Kateřina Šimáčková, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 18 April 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of nationwide protests in support of the jailed opposition leader, Aleksey Navalnyy. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 May 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
22656/21
02/04/2021
Maksim Andreyevich BALYUK
1995
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tomsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 17,000
Tomsk Regional Court
05/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
24208/21
22/04/2021
Ruslan Vasilyevich RAZGULIN
1975
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tver
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Tver Regional Court
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
38633/21
15/07/2021
Ilya Vitalyevich NETESOV
1992
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.23 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
38636/21
15/07/2021
Danila Dmitriyevich RUKHOVICH
1994
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9.50 a.m. until 5 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
38640/21
15/07/2021
Ilya Vasilyevich VAKHRUSHEV
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
38647/21
15/07/2021
Nikita Mikhaylovich PUZANKOV
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Samara
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Samara Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 8.38 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
40519/21
21/07/2021
Vladislav Vladimirovich KUDRYAVTSEV
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
28/01/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 5.10 p.m. on 25/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
41156/21
20/06/2021
Sergey Sergeyevich SUKHOVIRSKIY
1990
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until the morning on 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41261/21
03/08/2021
Andrey Georgiyevich TATARESKU
2000
Danshov Vadim Eduardovich
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
45309/21
27/08/2021
Boris Mikhaylovich NIKOLSKIY
1970
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 2.10 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
45472/21
12/08/2021
Adelina Mansurovna YAGFAROVA
2001
Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna
Leninigorsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Naberezhnyye Chelny
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
03/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4 p.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
45479/21
30/08/2021
Olga Vladimirovna OGNEVA
1991
Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich
Krasnoyarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
20/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
45489/21
12/08/2021
Dilyara Mudarisovna ILYASOVA
1995
Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna
Leninigorsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Naberezhnyye Chelny
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021.
4,000
45543/21
12/08/2021
Dmitriy Ilnurovich VALEYEV
1994
Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna
Leninigorsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Naberezhnyye Chelny
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4 p.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
45561/21
25/08/2021
Vasiliy Ivanovich NIKITENKO
1987
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tomsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Tomsk Regional Court
05/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
45616/21
24/08/2021
Pavel Vladimirovich RAKEVICH
1984
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Yekaterinburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
21/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
45623/21
31/08/2021
Kseniya Yevgenyevna KAPRANOVA
1985
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Ryazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Ryazan Regional Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.40 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 10.40 a.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
45876/21
10/09/2021
Kirill Borisovich BOKAREV
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.49 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 8.15 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
46802/21
15/09/2021
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich CHILIKOV
1986
Valiyeva Elza Albertovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Nizhniy Novgorod
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
12/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
49662/21
16/09/2021
Ivan Aleksandrovich PERMYAKOV
1999
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. until 7.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
52366/21
18/09/2021
Yanis Vladimirovich TOVKES
1985
Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich
Velikiy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
53504/21
07/10/2021
Viktoriya Vladimirovna DOLNIKOVA
1998
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
07/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.50 p.m. until 6 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54944/21
29/10/2021
Andrey Ivanovich KOSHKIN
1983
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Primorye Regional Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.40 p.m. until 8.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
55510/21
23/10/2021
Ivan Vitalyevich ORLOV
2002
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
03/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
55643/21
19/10/2021
Nikita Konstantinovich RAMENSKIY
2000
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
55924/21
26/10/2021
Mariya Eduardovna SYRTSEVA
2000
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Cheboksary
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
55927/21
26/10/2021
Yevgeniy Vladimirovich IVANOV
1992
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Cheboksary
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
56115/21
23/10/2021
Irina Vladlenovna STARISTINA
1995
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
56425/21
15/11/2021
Danila Aleksandrovich GALKIN
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Vladimir
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
56707/21
15/11/2021
Olga Nikolayevna BAZHENOVA
1992
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
56732/21
15/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich KALININ
1988
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tver
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Tver Regional Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
59244/21
12/11/2021
Nikolay Alekseyevich SLYUSAREV
1987
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 6 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 1.06 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60100/21
19/11/2021
Miron Igorevich SAMKOV
2002
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
03/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.30 p.m. until 6 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60115/21
20/11/2021
Ilya Kakhaberovich PLYUSNIN
1992
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60646/21
23/11/2021
Yelena Borisovna SIROTKINA
1987
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
07/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61233/21
02/12/2021
Aleksandr Leonidovich AVDEYEV
1964
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kirov
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Kirov Regional Court
17/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.