Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)12
Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in
Twenty-eight cases against Hungary
Application No.
Case
Date of the decision
60658/11
László BARACSKAI
07/07/2015
35440/11
Mihály BAUKÓ
07/07/2015
27617/10
Margit BOGÁTINÉ LÁSZLÓ
07/07/2015
40134/11
János BRAZOVICS
08/09/2015
1725/11
Györgyné BRUZSA
07/07/2015
1925/11
DOT-ING KFT
07/07/2015
23143/11
FALCO-2000 KFT
07/07/2015
51836/09
Pál FARKAS
10/03/2015
17885/12
Zsolt FEJES
08/09/2015
132/11
Sándor FODOR
07/07/2015
3594/11
Róza GUBÁSNÉ JÁNOSSY
07/07/2015
70701/11
Attila JAKUS
07/07/2015
40997/11
István KATONA AND Ildikó KATONÁNÉ PINTÉR
07/07/2015
31620/11
Ernő KATONA
07/07/2015
67967/10
Péter Gábor KOVÁCS
21/04/2015
72830/11
Ádám LÖFFLER
08/09/2015
27026/12
Józsefné NEUBERGER
08/09/2015
49561/11
Viktor PÁRICSI
07/07/2015
20240/12
Gyula PETRECZ
08/09/2015
40857/11
László REKVÉNYI
07/07/2015
74762/13
Margit RÉTHY
19/05/2015
34918/11
Ida SAMU
07/07/2015
46746/11
Tamás SZALAY
07/07/2015
28975/11
Ágnes Irén TÁRNOK
07/07/2015
3187/08
Emese TÓTH
02/06/2015
40882/11
Mária TÓTH
07/07/2015
73510/11
Csaba Nándorné VÁRI
07/07/2015
56284/09
József and Józsefné VIZSY
02/06/2015
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 February 2016 at the 1248th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;
Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and
DECIDES to close their examination.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy