Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)379
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Baygeldi against Türkiye
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 December 2025
at the 1545th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
2577/19
BAYGELDİ
09/07/2024
09/07/2024
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established on account of the applicant’s inability to confront the witness whose statements were used by trial courts as decisive evidence in criminal proceedings against him;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to execute the judgment and noting that no award of just satisfaction was made by the Court in this case (see document DH-DD(2025)987);
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the applicant did not avail himself of the possibility, provided by national law, to request the reopening of the domestic proceedings;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Orhan Çaçan (26437/04) group of cases also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to the examination of absent witnesses and the use by the courts of the evidence given by those witnesses;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case;
CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have been adopted;
DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures in the Orhan Çaçan v. Turkey (26437/04) group;
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.