SECOND SECTION
CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 20061/17 and 107 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
6 September 2022
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Bayram and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Saadet Yüksel, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and nine Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the applications to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 28 June 2022,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terrorist Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 7‑14 and §§ 109-110, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time.
2. On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios, the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary, including members of high courts, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor’s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FETÖ/PDY, may be found in Baş, cited above, §§ 9-10 and 15-21).
3. Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş, cited above, § 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a “continuing offence” and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Baş, cited above, § 67, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 30-31, 23 November 2021)
4. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and some were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.
5. In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia, the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (see Turan and Others, cited above, §§ 26‑27).
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS6. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors and section 46 of the Court of Cassation Act (Law no. 2797).
8. The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 55). The Court notes that the Government’s objections have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 57‑64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
9. The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of Baş and Turan and Others (both cited above, §§ 143-158 and §§ 79‑96, respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (see Baş, cited above, §§ 115-116 and §§ 159‑162, and Turan and Others, cited above, § 91 and 95).
OTHER COMPLAINTSAlleged violation of Article 6 (non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion) and Article 8 (registration of letters)10. Applicant in application no. 53285/19 complained under Article 6 of the Convention of the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s written opinion during the proceedings before the Bakırköy Assize Court, where he had contested some restrictions imposed by the prison authorities. Furthermore, the applicant in application no. 47398/19 complained under Article 8 that the letters he sent from the prison were being registered on the National Judicial Network Server (UYAP).
11. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention (see, for instance, Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 33-71, 30 April 2013, and Günana and Others v. Turkey, nos. 70934/10 and 4 others, § 79, 20 November 2018).
12. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
Remaining complaints13. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4, 5 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
14. The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
15. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
16. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑107), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention admissible;Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants;Declares the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention regarding the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion (application no. 53285/19) and the complaint under Article 8 concerning the registration of letters sent from prison (application no. 47398/19) inadmissible;Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 8 of the Convention;Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction.Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 September 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Hasan Bakırcı Pauliine Koskelo
Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases :
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Date of Birth
Represented by
Applicant’s status at the time of pre-trial detention
1.
20061/17
Bayram v. Türkiye
23/02/2017
Mehmet BAYRAM
08/05/1975
Kadri İNCE
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
2.
27433/17
Yaz v. Türkiye
27/02/2017
Burhan YAZ
17/03/1968
Elif EKİCİ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
3.
36899/17
Yalçın v. Türkiye
16/01/2017
Ali YALÇIN
01/06/1975
Cengiz ÇITAK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
4.
40719/17
Türkyılmaz v. Türkiye
27/03/2017
Muhammed TÜRKYILMAZ
04/03/1988
Mustafa YILDIZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
5.
41664/17
Karaarslan v. Türkiye
27/04/2017
Yavuz KARAARSLAN
13/02/1972
Tuğba ÜSTÜNEL ÖZKAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
6.
41879/17
Kopal v. Türkiye
17/04/2017
Murat KOPAL
21/01/1981
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
7.
45028/17
Erşen v. Türkiye
26/05/2017
Serkan ERŞEN
24/07/1980
Gökçehan SAĞLAM
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
8.
46942/17
Uğurlu v. Türkiye
15/03/2017
Mehmet UĞURLU
31/07/1976
Mehmet ARI
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
9.
58972/17
Alanur v. Türkiye
20/04/2017
Hakkı Hakan ALANUR
12/11/1968
Şakir HEPİYİLER
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
10.
61242/17
Beydili v. Türkiye
16/06/2017
Mustafa BEYDİLİ
03/03/1988
İmdat BERKSOY
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
11.
61647/17
Turgut v. Türkiye
30/05/2017
Salih TURGUT
10/05/1983
Süleyman DOĞRUER
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
12.
61652/17
Varol v. Türkiye
25/04/2017
Muhammet VAROL
02/05/1979
İlyas TEKİN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
13.
61970/17
Demircan v. Türkiye
26/04/2017
Mustafa DEMİRCAN
24/08/1976
Yasemin DEMİRCAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
14.
62720/17
Pınar v. Türkiye
28/04/2017
Mehmet Erkan PINAR
01/01/1969
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
15.
62773/17
Gürses v. Türkiye
28/04/2017
Uğur GÜRSES
25/01/1987
Ebubekir RENK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
16.
62774/17
Arkuntaş v. Türkiye
10/02/2017
Mesut ARKUNTAŞ
31/08/1973
Sefanur BOZGÖZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
17.
63579/17
Toprak v. Türkiye
25/05/2017
Ahmet TOPRAK
21/12/1990
Önder ÖZDERYOL
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
18.
63582/17
Şahin v. Türkiye
10/05/2017
Adil ŞAHİN
12/07/1985
Kamile KILDAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
19.
63622/17
Aburşu v. Türkiye
28/03/2017
Serdar ABURŞU
20/08/1982
Tufan YILMAZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
20.
63712/17
Şişaneci v. Türkiye
20/04/2017
Mustafa ŞİŞANECİ
15/05/1983
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
21.
63740/17
Köse v. Türkiye
13/06/2017
Ahmet KÖSE
27/03/1982
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
22.
63784/17
Akkan v. Türkiye
29/05/2017
Bahattin AKKAN
10/09/1977
Fatih DÖNMEZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
23.
66359/17
Altun v. Türkiye
26/01/2017
Recep ALTUN
16/07/1976
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
24.
66371/17
Soyal v. Türkiye
18/05/2017
Metin SOYAL
01/01/1973
Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
25.
70544/17
Tarhan v. Türkiye
27/07/2017
Kadir TARHAN
05/04/1982
Fatih DÖNMEZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
26.
70628/17
Özdemir v. Türkiye
21/08/2017
Hasan ÖZDEMİR
01/01/1984
Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
27.
70857/17
Güneş v. Türkiye
08/08/2017
Cuma GÜNEŞ
17/01/1986
Özge ALTINTOP
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
28.
73516/17
Çelebi v. Türkiye
05/09/2017
Bülent ÇELEBİ
04/04/1974
Regaip DEMİR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
29.
82865/17
Ülkü v. Türkiye
03/11/2017
Musa ÜLKÜ
30/11/1972
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
30.
6613/18
Kayaalp v. Türkiye
16/01/2018
Selahattin KAYAALP
15/02/1987
Demet YÜREKLİ KAYAALP
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
31.
14769/18
Yalçınöz v. Türkiye
25/07/2018
Bahadır YALÇINÖZ
19/02/1980
Barış ANTÜRK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
32.
17830/18
Aras v. Türkiye
04/04/2018
Bahattin ARAS
15/11/1977
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
33.
20047/18
Karaosmanoğlu v. Türkiye
06/03/2018
Mustafa KARAOSMANOĞLU
15/08/1980
Şerafettin AKTAŞ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
34.
27587/18
Memiş v. Türkiye
22/05/2018
Yusuf MEMİŞ
01/06/1966
Esad MEMİŞ
Member of Court of Cassation
35.
40298/18
Duran v. Türkiye
16/08/2018
Eyüp Murat DURAN
04/02/1977
Ali DURGUN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
36.
52619/18
Gedikli v. Türkiye
26/10/2018
Halük GEDİKLİ
01/02/1969
İrem TATLIDEDE
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
37.
54227/18
Kaya v. Türkiye
12/10/2018
İlhan KAYA
03/08/1965
Yakup GÖNEN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
38.
11804/19
Şanal v. Türkiye
22/02/2019
Osman ŞANAL
10/03/1972
Ali ALAGÖZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
39.
13253/19
Çakın v. Türkiye
26/02/2019
Akın ÇAKIN
11/07/1967
Ahmet Kerem ÇAKIN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
40.
20941/19
Gülbaş v. Türkiye
05/04/2019
Abdullah GÜLBAŞ
03/10/1983
Halil İbrahim GÜLBAŞ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
41.
23663/19
Navruz v. Türkiye
22/04/2019
Yakup NAVRUZ
05/01/1981
Kamile KILDAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
42.
24746/19
Ertürk v. Türkiye
29/04/2019
Mustafa Celal ERTÜRK
11/02/1968
Oğuz Emre ERTÜRK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
43.
27944/19
Karabacak v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Engin KARABACAK
23/12/1980
Ömer Faruk ERGÜN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
44.
28219/19
Evğün v. Türkiye
08/05/2019
Saniye EVĞÜN
25/01/1984
Emre AKARYILDIZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
45.
28260/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
03/05/2019
Sami AYDIN
08/01/1973
Ahmet OKU
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
46.
30433/19
Saatçıoğlu v. Türkiye
20/05/2019
Fuat SAATÇIOĞLU
08/03/1984
Fatma Vildan YİRMİBEŞOĞLU
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
47.
30652/19
Kurmaz v. Türkiye
16/05/2019
Harun KURMAZ
01/10/1981
Hatice YILDIZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
48.
31483/19
Karpuz v. Türkiye
21/05/2019
İbrahim KARPUZ
30/03/1973
Ayşe DURMUŞ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
49.
31513/19
Temiz v. Türkiye
31/05/2019
Ömer TEMİZ
14/08/1980
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
50.
32201/19
Sarıkaya v. Türkiye
29/05/2019
Mustafa SARIKAYA
03/01/1987
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
51.
33924/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
14/06/2019
Mehmet ŞAHİN
03/12/1980
Nurcan BAL
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
52.
34034/19
Akıllı v. Türkiye
11/06/2019
İlhan AKILLI
23/04/1980
Mustafa SOYLU
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
53.
34060/19
Sarı v. Türkiye
17/06/2019
Halil SARI
26/03/1990
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
54.
36029/19
Çelik v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
Hasan ÇELİK
01/10/1984
Ebubekir ÇELİK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
55.
36037/19
Bekar v. Türkiye
24/06/2019
Mustafa BEKAR
18/09/1984
Ebubekir RENK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
56.
36331/19
Aydın v. Türkiye
18/06/2019
Fatma Serpil AYDIN
22/07/1988
Mehmet Fatih İÇER
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
57.
36334/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
19/06/2019
İlyas ŞAHİN
01/01/1976
Fatih DÖNMEZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
58.
36454/19
Karakaya v. Türkiye
26/06/2019
Mustafa KARAKAYA
12/03/1981
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
59.
36535/19
Tatar v. Türkiye
18/06/2019
Sinan TATAR
01/07/1989
Hanifi BAYRI
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
60.
36918/19
Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
Osman KILIÇASLAN
09/10/1978
Enes Malik KILIÇ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
61.
36941/19
Kara v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
Enis KARA
01/09/1981
Murat ÇAKAL
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
62.
36957/19
Alkan v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
Ömer Faruk ALKAN
08/05/1990
Rabia ALKAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
63.
37541/19
Cebre v. Türkiye
30/05/2019
Ayvaz CEBRE
30/07/1984
Ceren ATALAY
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
64.
38913/19
Akdoğan v. Türkiye
09/07/2019
Şerife AKDOĞAN
09/03/1989
Murat GÜNDEM
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
65.
40674/19
Zengin v. Türkiye
20/07/2019
Ali Osman ZENGİN
26/04/1971
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
66.
41521/19
Serli v. Türkiye
08/07/2019
Ufuk SERLİ
08/05/1985
Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
67.
44303/19
Çekiç v. Türkiye
09/08/2019
Mahmut ÇEKİÇ
23/10/1970
Ömer NAZLIM
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
68.
44341/19
Polat v. Türkiye
05/08/2019
İsmail POLAT
15/01/1974
İlyas TEKİN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
69.
44464/19
Dönmez v. Türkiye
08/08/2019
Celalettin DÖNMEZ
15/12/1972
Fatih DÖNMEZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
70.
44529/19
Sağlam v. Türkiye
06/08/2019
Harun SAĞLAM
15/06/1979
Gizay DULKADİR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
71.
46185/19
Kuzgun v. Türkiye
20/08/2019
Ersan KUZGUN
13/11/1984
Cebrail Eren KAYNAR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
72.
46758/19
Aykaç v. Türkiye
26/08/2019
Fatih AYKAÇ
01/02/1975
Menekşe Merve TEKTEN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
73.
47398/19
Yetim v. Türkiye
24/08/2019
Servet YETİM
08/09/1971
İzettin DEMİR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
74.
47483/19
Kurt v. Türkiye
15/08/2019
Sami KURT
18/02/1978
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
75.
50697/19
Ünlü v. Türkiye
28/08/2019
Erhan ÜNLÜ
01/09/1967
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
76.
50704/19
Demirci v. Türkiye
04/09/2019
Osman DEMİRCİ
04/08/1972
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
77.
51002/19
Takımsu v. Türkiye
27/08/2019
Mehmet TAKIMSU
01/11/1983
Kamile KILDAN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
78.
51180/19
Demirtaş v. Türkiye
23/08/2019
Murat DEMİRTAŞ
15/10/1988
Hanifi BAYRI
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
79.
51768/19
Kızılyel v. Türkiye
03/09/2019
Serkan KIZILYEL
10/02/1979
Fatih Mehmet ADANIR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
80.
51798/19
Müftüoğlu v. Türkiye
10/09/2019
Kamil MÜFTÜOĞLU
10/08/1983
Cemal GELİNCİK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
81.
52458/19
Öztürk v. Türkiye
25/09/2019
Özcan ÖZTÜRK
16/02/1982
Tolga Kaan PATAZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
82.
52774/19
Öztürk v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Hakan ÖZTÜRK
20/03/1983
Emre AKARYILDIZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
83.
52792/19
Küçükkaya v. Türkiye
10/09/2019
Mukadder KÜÇÜKKAYA
26/02/1978
Mehmet MİRZA
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
84.
53000/19
Karabidek v. Türkiye
27/09/2019
Mehmet KARABİDEK
01/05/1971
İrem TATLIDEDE
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
85.
53078/19
Karaca v. Türkiye
02/10/2019
Yalçın KARACA
01/01/1973
Uğur ALTUN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
86.
53172/19
Gönen v. Türkiye
27/09/2019
Fikret GÖNEN
21/05/1975
Yeşim KAYALI GÖNEN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
87.
53285/19
Beyazıt v. Türkiye
20/09/2019
Arzu BEYAZIT
28/03/1978
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
88.
53497/19
Koç v. Türkiye
09/10/2019
Ali KOÇ
22/07/1974
Hanifi BAYRI
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
89.
53539/19
Şahinkaya v. Türkiye
28/08/2019
Murat ŞAHİNKAYA
25/06/1982
Burcu AKYÜZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
90.
53547/19
Ekinci v. Türkiye
28/08/2019
Mehmet EKİNCİ
02/01/1988
Atıf DOĞUŞ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
91.
54194/19
Demirtaş v. Türkiye
11/10/2019
Nidai DEMİRTAŞ
19/02/1979
İbrahim Menderes ÇÖLOVA
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
92.
54226/19
Güngör v. Türkiye
25/09/2019
Engin GÜNGÖR
06/01/1983
Elif Nurbanu OR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
93.
56008/19
Kalaycı v. Türkiye
07/10/2019
Emrah KALAYCI
01/12/1981
Muhammet ATALAY
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
94.
56175/19
Avcı v. Türkiye
23/09/2019
Sadettin AVCI
04/01/1971
Emre AKARYILDIZ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
95.
56405/19
Uğurlu v. Türkiye
17/10/2019
Hüseyin UĞURLU
01/12/1975
Mehmet Fatih İÇER
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
96.
56568/19
Sarışık v. Türkiye
16/10/2019
Alper SARIŞIK
10/05/1989
Hürriyet SÜMER KALA
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
97.
56778/19
Okur v. Türkiye
24/09/2019
İbrahim OKUR
29/12/1966
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
98.
57719/19
Şahin v. Türkiye
25/10/2019
Ömer ŞAHİN
05/09/1982
Miraç TAMER
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
99.
58816/19
Hendek v. Türkiye
09/10/2019
Hasan HENDEK
15/01/1972
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
100.
59635/19
Yeşil v. Türkiye
07/11/2019
Ufuk YEŞİL
16/09/1979
Merve Elif GÜRACAR
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
101.
63404/19
Püsküllüoğlu v. Türkiye
25/11/2019
Mustafa PÜSKÜLLÜOĞLU
09/02/1984
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
102.
64701/19
Gün v. Türkiye
05/12/2019
Hüsnü GÜN
05/05/1985
Kübra DEMİRTAŞ
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
103.
1068/20
Özdemir v. Türkiye
17/12/2019
Erdal ÖZDEMİR
29/09/1981
Kubilay PARLAK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
104.
2167/20
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
10/12/2019
Ali Çetin YILMAZ
01/08/1976
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
105.
2511/20
Çolak v. Türkiye
26/12/2019
Ümit Zafer ÇOLAK
30/08/1974
Şeyma SÜMENGEN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
106.
6245/20
Ulusoy v. Türkiye
13/01/2020
Sinan ULUSOY
11/11/1977
Samet CAM
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
107.
6385/20
Çakmak v. Türkiye
09/01/2020
Ahmet Salim ÇAKMAK
14/04/1988
Kadriye TÜMEN
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
108.
9017/20
Barut v. Türkiye
24/01/2020
Mehmet BARUT
27/03/1987
Esra BARUT
09/10/1989
Elkan ALBAYRAK
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
Ordinary judge or public prosecutor