Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)63
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Beljan against Bosnia and Herzegovina
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 March 2022
at the 1430th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
81142/17
BELJAN
19/12/2019
19/12/2019
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of administrative proceedings (violation of Article 6, paragraph 1);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government, indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2021)1324);
Considering that the question of individual measures in this case was resolved, given that the just satisfaction is paid, and that the domestic proceedings were brought to an end;
Recalling that the question of general measures continues to be examined within the framework of Hadžajlić group of cases and the closure of this case in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.