Resolution ResDH(2003)95
concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
of 19 mars 2002 (final on 19 June 2002)
in the case of Benzi against France
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 June 2003
at the 841st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Benzi case delivered on 19 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;
Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 46280/99) against France, lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 15 February 1999 under Article 34 of the Convention by Mr Roberto Benzi, a French national, and that the Court declared admissible the complaint relating to the excessive length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the labour courts and the administrative Courts;
Whereas in its judgment of 19 March 2002 the Court unanimously:
- held that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention;
- held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment became final, 7 000 euros in respect of non-pecuniary damage; 6 871,64 euros, including value-added tax, in respect of costs and expenses and that simple interest at an annual rate of 4,26% would be payable on those sums from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement ;
- dismissed the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform it of the measures which had been taken in consequence of the judgment of 19 March 2002, having regard to France’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by it;
Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the government of the respondent state indicated that the Court’s judgment had been sent out to the authorities directly concerned;
Having satisfied itself that on 12 July 2002, within the time-limit set, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant the sums provided for in the judgment of 19 March 2002,
Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of France, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy