Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)302
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Eight cases against Serbia
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 September 2018 at the 1322nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
24923/15
BILIĆ
17/10/2017
17/10/2017
2866/16+
BATIĆ AND OTHERS
17/10/2017
17/10/2017
23915/15
JANKOVIĆ
16/05/2017
16/05/2017
21518/09
JANKOVIĆ
18/11/2014
18/11/2014
24291/08
KLIKOVAC AND OTHERS
05/03/2013
05/03/2013
30723/09+
KRNDIJA AND OTHERS
27/06/2017
27/09/2017
54770/15
MAKSOVIĆ
17/10/2017
17/10/2017
24465/11
RADULOVIĆ
03/10/2017
03/10/2017
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the non-enforcement of domestic judgments rendered against socially-owned companies;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic judgments were enforced;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework the cases R. Kačapor and Others (Application No. 2269/06) and Kin-Stib and Majkić (Application No. 12312/05) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy