FIRST SECTION
CASE OF BORODIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 50067/18 and 37 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
7 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Borodin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lətif Hüseynov, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Erik Wennerström, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 8 February 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocols.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention, Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62-65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence, and Elvira Dmitriyeva v. Russia, nos. 60921/17 and 7202/18, §§ 77-90, 30 April 2019, concerning administrative convictions for making calls to participate in public events.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraph 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 7 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
50067/18
10/10/2018
Georgiy Andreyevich BORODIN
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation against Putin’s re-election
Voronezh
05/05/2018
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
04/07/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings ended on 04/07/2018 (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings ended on 21/06/2018 (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO)
4,000
26536/21
30/04/2021
Kseniya Alekseyevna PAKHOMOVA
1994
Solovyev Leonid Alekseyevich
Moscow
Manifestation to support A. Navalnyy
Pokrov
06/04/2021
article 20.2.2 § 3 of CAO
detention for 9 days
Vladimir Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (i) escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.00 p.m. on 06/04/2021 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/04/2021; (ii) escorting to the police station on 25/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentences of administrative detention imposed on the applicant (both sets of administrative proceedings) were executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Moscow, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision Moscow City Court 29/04/2021
5,000
49537/21
16/09/2021
Nina Aleksandrovna RESHETILOVA
1970
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Rally against construction works in Mitino Park
Moscow
27/09/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 22/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Moscow, Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO, detention for 15 days, final decision Moscow City Court 26/04/2021
4,000
51178/21
08/10/2021
Maksim Vyacheslavovich PAYELOV
1987
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
Manifestation to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow
21/03/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 150,000
Moscow City Court
14/04/2021
Moscow City Court
25/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and on 11/05/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings
4,000
51346/21
18/09/2021
Darya Andreyevna UDACHINA
2001
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
51913/21
08/10/2021
Maksim Igorevich CHERKASOV
1986
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Tambov
12/03/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 6 days
Tambov Regional Court
26/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings which ended on 28/06/2021 (Art. 20.2 § 2 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings which ended on 26/05/2021 (Art. 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO),
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 31/01/2021 in Tambov, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 7 days, final decision Tambov Regional Court 26/05/2021
5,000
54830/21
29/10/2021
Olga Aleksandrovna KARTAVTSEVA
1980
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Omsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Omsk Regional Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.20 p.m. until 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
54934/21
27/10/2021
Konstantin Valentinovich POKHILCHUK
1996
Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich
St Petersburg
Opposition gathering
St Petersburg
22/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
56688/21
02/11/2021
Alipat Magomedovna SULTANBEGOVA
1991
Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich
Krasnodar
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Krasnodar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
05/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) from 5.30 p.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021; (ii) from 18.30 p.m. on 19/04/2021 until 7.00 p.m. on 20/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Krasnodar, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, detention for 10 days, final decision Krasnodar Regional Court 09/08/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant (proceedings ended on 09/08/2021) was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
56883/21
31/10/2021
Alina Dmitriyevna MACHULSKAYA
1991
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Forum of independent local elected representative
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 6.00 p.m. on 13/03/2021
4,000
57098/21
08/11/2021
Sergey Yevgenyevich VDOVIN
1969
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Forum of independent local elected representatives
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 3.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021
4,000
57102/21
08/11/2021
Dmitriy Igorevich GOLIKOV
1983
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Forum of independent local elected representatives
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.00 p.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021
4,000
57633/21
07/11/2021
Maksudzhon Mashrabovich KOMILOV
1990
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Gathering in front of Tadjik Embassy
Moscow
02/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
13/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 02/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
61502/21
19/11/2021
Vladislav Vladimirovich BAYKOV
1995
Kseniya Andreyevna KOCHERGO
1997
Nechiporenko Natalya Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.22 p.m. until 11.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
323/22
08/12/2021
Timofey Viktorovich ANDRONOV
1996
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Volgograd
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
21/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.20 p.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
1414/22
30/12/2021
Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPOV
1979
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yaroslavl
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Yaroslavl Regional Court
08/09/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
2791/22
30/12/2021
Zhanna Yevgenyevna VAGINA
1972
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Polyarniye Zori
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Murmansk Regional Court
23/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Polyarniye Zori, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision by the Murmansk Regional Court on 23/07/2021
4,000
2825/22
30/12/2021
Nikolay Pavlovich PRIBYLOV
1979
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
Polyarniye Zori
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Murmansk Regional Court
13/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - rally to support A. Navalnyy on 21/04/2021 in Polyarniye Zori, Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO, fine of RUB 20,000, final decision by the Murmansk Regional Court on 13/08/2021
4,000
3298/22
30/12/2021
Aleksandr Vasilyevich POPOV
1979
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Yaroslavl
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Yaroslavl Regional Court
20/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
3951/22
21/12/2021
Andrey Sergeyevich VOROBYEV
1988
Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich
Gatchina
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
St Petersburg City Court
22/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4130/22
24/12/2021
Yana Vladimirovna BELYAYEVA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
24/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 1.20 p.m. until 5.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4182/22
23/12/2021
Emiliya Sergeyevna ALEKSEYEVA
1989
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
24/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.58 p.m. until 10.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4226/22
18/12/2021
Yelena Georgiyevna MURGANOVA
1988
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Opposition gathering
St Petersburg
18/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.42 p.m. until 6.41 p.m. on 18/06/2020,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4597/22
24/12/2021
Andrey Pavlovich SYCHEV
1988
Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
15/09/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.52 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.50 a.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4625/22
24/12/2021
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich OVCHINNIKOV
2002
Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
29/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 5.20 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
4766/22
24/12/2021
Denis Anatolyevich GETMAN
1987
Gerasimova Yekaterina Viktorovna
St Petersburg
Opposition gathering
St Petersburg
22/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
06/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.49 p.m. until 9.49 p.m. on 22/06/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7502/22
30/12/2021
Andrey Andreyevich NOVOKRESHCHENNYKH
1987
Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich
Krasnoyarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
15/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.50 p.m. until 4.02 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7538/22
24/01/2022
Farit Zufarovih SHARAFUTDINOV
1988
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
29/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from approximately 11.00 a.m. until 8.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7631/22
18/01/2022
Naum Isayevich GURALNIK
1934
Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich
Mytishchi
Forum of independent local elected representatives
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court in Moscow
22/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.00 a.m. until 11.00 p.m. on 13/03/2021
4,000
7733/22
13/01/2022
Olga Anatolyevna NIKOLAYEVA
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tver
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Tver Regional Court
21/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.05 p.m. until 8.25 p.m. on 21/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7746/22
13/01/2022
Mariya Mikhaylovna SHCHETININA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
15/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.35 a.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
8030/22
14/01/2022
Sofya Olegovna MEDVEDEVA
1995
Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich
Sochi
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Sochi
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 19,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
8097/22
15/01/2022
Yelena Borisovna FERDMAN
1980
Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich
Yekaterinburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Ekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
21/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
8100/22
14/01/2022
Valentin Vladimirovich YAKUNIN
1967
Usanova Olimpiada Valentinovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
14/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 12.40 p.m. until 6.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
8245/22
29/01/2022
Anastasiya Arnoldovna MOISEYEVA
2003
Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich
Velikiy Novgorod
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Novgorod
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 du CIA
fine of RUB 5,000
Novgorod Regional Court
12/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station from 8.00 p.m. until 10.10 p.m. on 21/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - absence of a prosecutor in the appeal instance
4,000
27426/22
17/05/2022
Polina Pavlovna BASHUROVA
1998
Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna
St Petersburg
Gathering on occasion of International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women
St Petersburg
25/11/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
18/01/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8.15 p.m. on 25/11/2021 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 27/11/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
32097/22
31/05/2022
Mikhail Grigoryevich FEDOROV
1972
Podolskiy Sergey Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Protest against the war in Ukraine
St Petersburg
06/03/2022
Protest against the war in Ukraine
St Petersburg
13/03/2022
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
detention for 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
09/06/2022
St Petersburg City Court
17/03/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) first set of the proceedings - from 1.50 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until 1.30 a.m. on 07/03/2022; (ii) second set of the proceedings - from 2.30 p.m. on 13/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 14/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of the administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
45432/22
26/08/2022
Arina Sergeyevna ZABOLOTSKIKH
2002
Sabirov Rim Faridovich
Kazan
Protest against the war in Ukraine
Kazan
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan
27/04/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report: (i) first set of the proceedings - from 2.05 p.m. on 06/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on 07/03/2022; (ii) second set of the proceedings - from 3.50 on 15/03/2022 until the hearing in the first-instance court on the same day,
Art. 10 (1) - conviction for the display of slogans/banners/other symbols by participants in public events - displaying banner, Art. 20.3.3 § 1 of CAO, fine of RUB 30,000, Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, 25/05/2022
5,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.