FIRST SECTION
CASE OF BUKHTENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 63772/17 and 49 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Bukhtenko and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention or Protocols to it.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
Jurisdiction6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely the dispersal of these assemblies, as well as their arrest followed by their conviction for administrative offence. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-67, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
Remaining complaints14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention or Protocols to it. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)
[1]
63772/17
18/08/2017
Mikhail Vladimirovich BUKHTENKO
1995
Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich
Sochi
Anticorruption rally
Krasnodar,
26/03/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Krasnodar Regional Court
06/04/2017
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
63782/17
18/08/2017
Biyslan Murdinovich ZHANE
1994
Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich
Sochi
Anticorruption rally
Krasnodar,
26/03/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Krasnodar Regional Court
06/04/2017
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
68068/17
11/09/2017
Natalya Vladimirovna GRYAZNEVICH
1989
Golubok Sergey Aleksandrovich
Vilnius
Political event
St Petersburg,
29/04/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 800
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
30/05/2017
St Petersburg City Court
20/06/2017
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 29-30/04/2017 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report.
4,000
70548/17
21/09/2017
Dmitriy Nikolayevich DOROGOV
1981
Anticorruption rally
Moscow,
26/03/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Moscow City Court
18/04/2017
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
6456/18
10/01/2018
Yelena Aleksandrovna CHEBOTAREVA
1988
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Anticorruption rally
St Petersburg,
12/06/2017
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000 and
1 day of detention
St Petersburg City Court
11/07/2017
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
8422/18
12/01/2018
Aleksandr Vladimirovich STRELTSOV
1970
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Anticorruption rally
St Petersburg,
12/06/2017
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/07/2017
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 12-13/06/2017 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling offence reports,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
21532/18
20/04/2018
Mikhail Borisovich KASIMOV
1961
Opposition rally
Perm,
07/10/2017
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
60 hours of community work
Perm Regional Court
24/11/2017
3,500
51147/18
10/10/2018
Natalya Romanovna SINYAKOVA
1997
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Opposition rally
St Petersburg,
28/01/2018
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
5 days of detention
4 days of detention
St Petersburg City Court
22/05/2018
St Petersburg City Court
22/05/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
54372/18
26/10/2018
Yegor Andreyevich KOMAROV
1999
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Opposition rally
St Petersburg,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
5 days of detention
St Petersburg City Court
29/05/2018
St Petersburg City Court
29/05/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
54913/18
31/10/2018
Igor Gennadyevich STARUN
1998
Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Opposition rally
St Petersburg,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
5 days of detention
St Petersburg City Court
29/05/2018
St Petersburg City Court
29/05/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling offence reports,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
57676/18
22/11/2018
Yana Olegovna GERASIMOVA
1993
Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich
Krasnoyarsk
Opposition rally
Krasnoyarsk,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
3 days of detention
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
07/06/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
58112/18
17/11/2018
Nikita Valeryevich SHEVCHENKO
1999
Benyash Mikhail Mikhaylovich
Sochi
Opposition rally
Krasnodar,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
5 days of detention
Krasnodar Regional Court
18/05/2018
3,500
58765/18
04/12/2018
Yaroslav Romanovich MUDRYAKOV
1992
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Opposition rally
Cheboksary,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
31/05/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
59648/18
06/12/2018
Ruslan Sarkarovich LITOSH
1996
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Opposition rally
Cheboksary,
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community work
20 hours of community work
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
08/06/2018
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
07/06/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
39557/21
29/07/2021
Kirill Sergeyevich LYAPUNOV
1996
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
40050/21
27/07/2021
Aleksey Aleksandrovich FILATOV
1981
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-02/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
40059/21
27/07/2021
Aleksandr Gennadiyevich ZELENSKIY
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
15 days of detention
Moscow City Court
03/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
40163/21
27/07/2021
Andrey Mikhaylovich PRUDSKOY
1995
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
7 days of detention
Moscow City Court
08/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
40318/21
27/07/2021
Aleksey Valeryevich KOMAROV
1993
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
13 days of detention
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
40446/21
19/07/2021
Aleksandr Vladimirovich NAUMOV
1999
Zatonskaya Yuliya Vladimirovna
Lipetsk
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Lipetsk,
23/01/2021
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Lipetsk,
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 75,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
11/03/2021
Lipetsk Regional Court
10/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - (i) on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report and (ii) on 21-22/04/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,850
40500/21
28/07/2021
Yuliya Yuryevna MOROZOVA
1966
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Rostov-on-Don,
23/01/2021
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Rostov-on-Don,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
7 days of detention
10 days of detention
Rostov Regional Court
15/02/2021
Rostov Regional Court
08/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report and on 10/02/2021 (in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentences of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
40662/21
25/07/2021
Mariya Valeryevna TUROVETS
1986
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Volgograd,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
24/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
40819/21
21/07/2021
Vladimir Borisovich ZVONOVSKIY
1966
Krasikov Vladimir Vladimirovich
Samara
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Samara,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Samara Regional Court
15/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
41106/21
29/07/2021
Konstantin Aleksandrovich BEREZA
1985
Chashchilova Mariya Valeryevna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
41200/21
01/08/2021
Konstantin Valeryevich LIKHACHEV
1993
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
7 days of detention
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41464/21
31/07/2021
Aleksey Mikhaylovich VOSKOBOYNIKOV
1990
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
5 days of detention
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41646/21
07/08/2021
Dinislam Aleksandrovich SALIKHOV
1989
Agagyulyan Ani Mesropovna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Moscow City Court
09/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02-04/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
41675/21
06/08/2021
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSTYUK
1976
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
15 days of detention
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
42474/21
05/08/2021
Yevgeniy Andreyevich SYSOYEV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
8 days of detention
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021-01/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
43000/21
23/08/2021
Darya Sergeyevna SABAYEVA
1992
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl,
23/01/2021
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Yaroslavl Regional Court
22/04/2021
Yaroslavl Regional Court
30/03/2021
3,500
43142/21
12/08/2021
Anatoliy Viktorovich KUTSENKOV
1982
Zakhvatov Dmitriy Igorevich
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
20 days of detention
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021- 01/02/2021 detention after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
43184/21
11/08/2021
Albina Ravisovna KUZNETSOVA
1998
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Kazan,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
07/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30-31/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 23/01/2021.
4,000
43216/21
18/08/2021
Ivan Sergeyevich YAKOVLEV
2002
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally to commemorate the anniversary of the revolution
Perm,
07/11/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
02/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 07/11/2020 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
4,000
43276/21
09/08/2021
David Petrovich SHUSTOV
1996
Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna
St Petersburg
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
2 days of detention
St Petersburg City Court
18/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate execution of the sentence of detention; an appeal against conviction had no suspensive effect.
5,000
43497/21
12/08/2021
Irina Alekseyevna RAY
1968
MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre
St Petersburg
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
8 days of detention
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 02-03/02/2021 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
44199/21
26/08/2021
Zhanna Vladimirovna LEVKINA
1968
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Kurgan,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Kurgan Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
44391/21
26/08/2021
Kseniya Aleksandrovna VOLKOVA
1991
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Kazan,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
17/03/2021
3,500
44588/21
09/08/2021
Yuliya Dmitriyevna ILYUSHKINA
1999
Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
10 days of detention
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
5,000
45060/21
02/09/2021
Anastasiya Aleksandrovna TALYKOVA
2021
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Kurgan,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Kurgan Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
46957/21
20/09/2021
Sergey Yuryevich SHUNIN
1974
Valiyeva Elza Albertovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
11/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report.
4,000
48927/21
24/09/2021
Vasiliy Veniaminovich GRAUR
1982
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Vladimir,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Vladimir Regional Court
30/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
49283/21
22/09/2021
Nikita Stanislavovich PAVLOVETS
2001
Ivanova Tatyana Andreyevna
Irkutsk
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Irkutsk,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Irkutsk Regional Court
17/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
49471/21
01/10/2021
Aleksandr Gennadyevich SHEYKIN
1982
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Stavropol,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Stavropol Regional Court
07/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
50215/21
23/09/2021
Sergey Yuryevich BARANOV
1982
Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevcich
Nizhniy Tagil
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Yekaterinburg,
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
30 hours of community work
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
28/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
50602/21
29/09/2021
Viktoriya Pavlovna KAMENSKAYA
1987
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Novorossiysk,
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
51772/21
15/10/2021
Andrey Viktorovich ZADERENKO
1994
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Moscow,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
51933/21
15/10/2021
Aleksey Yuryevich DERYUSHEV
1992
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Perm,
23/01/2021
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Perm,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 15,000
Perm Regional Court
16/04/2021
Perm Regional Court
14/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 24/01/2021 and 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
51939/21
15/10/2021
Artem Viktorovich RODIONOV
1992
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Saransk,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of Mordovia Republic
28/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
52463/21
24/09/2021
Andrey Ashotovich SARKISYAN
1989
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy,
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Kamchatka Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings.
3,500
52559/21
01/10/2021
Oleg Sergeyevich SHATIN
1997
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally to support A. Navalnyy
Kazan,
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
28/04/2021
3,500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.