FOURTH SECTION
CASE OF CHIRKUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 1097/18 and 34 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
28 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Chirkunov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Branko Lubarda, President,
Armen Harutyunyan,
Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 7 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some of the applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID-related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention; and Korneyeva, cited above, §§ 62‑65 as to the right of the organisers or participants of public assemblies not to be tried and punished twice for the same offence.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Branko Lubarda
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
1097/18
13/12/2017
Ivan Igorevich CHIRKUNOV
1996
Ratnikova Svetlana Sergeyevna
St Petersburg
Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
and
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
32 hours of community service and detention for 14 days
St Peterburg City Court
04/07/2017 (two decisions on the same day)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to the police station on 12/06/2017 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO)
5,000
2291/18
28/12/2017
Tengiz Petrovich ADAMIYA
1986
Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
and
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000 and fine of RUB 500
St Petersburg City Court
04/07/2017 (two decisions on the same day)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty- escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report overnight between 12/06/2017 and 13/06/2017;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO)
4,000
3710/18
10/12/2017
Revolt Revoltovich PIMENOV
1964
Kulakova Yevgeniya Yuryevna
St Petersburg
Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
and
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
detention for 5 days and fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
22/06/2017 (two decisions on the same day)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report for more than 24 hours between 12/06/2017 and 13/06/2017;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO)
5,000
59149/18
24/11/2018
Arkadiy Sergeyevich RUKHLIN
1989
Olenichev Maksim Vladimirovich
St Petersburg
Manifestation against the President’s elections
St Petersburg
05/05/2018
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
and
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000 and detention for 7 days
St Peterburg City Court
24/05/2018
(two decisions on the same day)
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report for more than 24 hours between 05/05/2018 and 06/05/2018
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO)
5,000
48567/20
20/10/2020
Firaya Khatypovna KASIMOVA
1968
Rally for the protection of the environment
Osinovskoye
16/12/2019
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
and
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000 and fine of RUB 500
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
29/01/2020
(two decisions on the same day)
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings – in both sets of the proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution in the second set of proceedings (Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO) with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings (Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO);
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 16/12/2019
4,000
46395/21
07/08/2021
Shamil Akhmetovich MUSTAFIN
1964
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
08/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
47151/21
02/09/2021
Tatyana Viktorovna KARPOVA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
04/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47182/21
07/09/2021
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SERGIYENKO
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Rostov-on-Don
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Rostov Regional Court
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
5,000
47236/21
16/09/2021
Maksim Dmitriyevich ZEMTSOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Moscow City Court
06/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
47237/21
10/09/2021
Vladimir Vyacheslavovich KAPUSTINSKIY
1988
Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Pskov Regional Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47240/21
16/09/2021
Semen Andreyevich POPOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Komi Supreme Court
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty- escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.40 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47249/21
10/09/2021
Arseniy Denisovich TIMASHOV
1998
Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Pskov Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47251/21
10/09/2021
Yekaterina Nikolayevna NOVIKOVA
1984
Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna
Pskov
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Pskov Regional Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47270/21
09/09/2021
Yevgeniy Yevgenyevich MALINOVSKIY
1998
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47459/21
12/09/2021
Dmitriy Mikhaylovich FABRIKOV
1964
Vasilyev Aleksey Alekseyevich
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
12/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
47972/21
09/09/2021
Sergey Alekseyevich BAZHENOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Voronezh Regional Court
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.15 a.m. until 3.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
5,000
48027/21
09/09/2021
Ivan Aleksandrovich GOLOSOV
1991
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
12/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. until 11 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
48152/21
24/09/2021
Mikhail Vladimirovich AFANASYEV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
26/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.21 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 7.40 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
50402/21
29/09/2021
Nazim Sayanovich ZIGAYEV
1992
Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich
Gatchina
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
5,000
50535/21
30/09/2021
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich GRIGORYEV
1982
Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.52 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
50767/21
24/09/2021
Sergey Gennadyevich SHMELEV
1986
Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich
Sochi
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Sochi
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
Krasnodar Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 4 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
50818/21
24/09/2021
Dmitriy Eduardovich GRISHIN
1993
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.40 p.m. until 6 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
50831/21
24/09/2021
Ivan Alekseyevich YUDIN
2001
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
50833/21
24/09/2021
Mikhail Alekseyevich BELYAYEV
2001
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.50 p.m. until 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
50839/21
24/09/2021
Aleksandra Ivanovna MOISEYEVA
2001
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
50874/21
29/09/2021
Konstantin Vasilyevich TIMCHENKO
1991
Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich
Gatchina
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. to 7.52 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
5,000
50941/21
20/09/2021
Yegor Igorevich TALANOV
1998
Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich
Yekaterinburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Tagil
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
54084/21
04/10/2021
Mikhail Andreyevich LISENKOV
1999
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Pskov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Pskov Regional Court
05/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
55566/21
20/10/2021
Artur Rafaelovich KHANOV
1999
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
55571/21
20/10/2021
Vadim Igorevich KHRUSHCHEV
2000
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
55575/21
20/10/2021
Islam Eldarovich SHAIPOV
1994
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
26/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
55588/21
20/10/2021
Veronika Timurovna MUSTAFINA
2000
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
09/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
57306/21
14/11/2021
Tatevik Vladimirovna GISHIYAN
1994
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report
4,000
57310/21
18/11/2021
Dmitriy Igorevich SOLOKHIN
1977
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
57393/21
18/11/2021
Kseniya Alekseyevna PRIVALOVA
1999
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
19/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.