Resolution CM/ResDH(2026)83
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Four cases against the Republic of Moldova
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 29 April 2026
at the 1558th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
13229/04
Clionov
09/10/2007
09/01/2008
28790/03
Istrate (No. 2)
10/06/2008
10/09/2008
27888/04
Tudor-comert
04/11/2008
04/02/2009
65102/14
Dunas
17/05/2022
17/05/2022
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2026)149);
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 found by the Court in the Clionov judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Olaru group of cases, also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required concerning the failure to enforce final domestic court’s judgments;
Recalling also that the question of general measures required in response to the violation of Article 6 found by the Court in the Dunas judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Godorozea group of cases, also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required concerning the failure to properly summon for hearings;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.