Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)33
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Five cases against Romania
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 March 2021
at the 1398th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
5512/02
CRĂCIUN
30/09/2008
26/01/2009
4125/12
DRĂGUŞANU AND CHRISTOULACIS
26/07/2018
26/10/2018
66580/12
BIVOLARU (No 2)
02/10/2018
02/01/2019
45585/13
CHERCIU
06/06/2019
06/06/2019
71299/14
ȘTEFU
06/06/2019
06/06/2019
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention established on account of the excessive length of civil or criminal proceedings;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction, where awarded by the Court, and considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings at issue have been completed;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Vlad and Others group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy