CASE OF DANIŠ AND SUDIN AGAINST SLOVAKIA AND 6 OTHER CASES

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi

Karar Metni

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt }.sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse }.s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle }.s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt }.sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold }.s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt }.sFBC99493 { font-style:italic }.s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super }.s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }.sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse }.s9833E78A { height:12.2pt }.s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt }.s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt }

Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)377

Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights

Seven cases against the Slovak Republic

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 December 2025
at the 1545th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Date of the decision

11544/24

Ján Pavol DANIŠ AND Patrik SUDIN

07/05/2025

15787/24

BL SLOVAKIA, SPOL. S R.O.

27/03/2025

18107/24

František JACKO

27/03/2025

20476/24

Michal POTOMA AND 3 OTHER APPLICATIONS

06/02/2025

21375/24

M.HOUSE S.R.O.

27/02/2025

24080/24

Peter ĎURAČKA

27/03/2025

25357/24

Jozef BOLEDOVIČ

13/03/2025

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and

DECIDES to close their examination.

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy