Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)124
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Six cases against Turkey
Application
Case
Judgment of
Final on
8543/05
DIKEL
29/09/2009
29/12/2009
45874/05
KARAYIĞIT YAVUZ SELIM
27/10/2009
27/01/2010
21316/05
BIÇER
08/06/2010
08/09/2010
35164/05
ABDULLAH YILDIZ
26/04/2011
26/07/2011
9548/06
ARSLANTAY
14/12/2010
14/03/2011
16231/06+
YILMAZ AND ZABUN
12/10/2010
21/02/2011
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 September 2014
at the 1206th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in the above cases and to the violations established;
Recalling that the respondent State’s obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide to by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2014)664);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and;
DECIDES to close their examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy