1177th meeting – 11 September 2013
Appendix 2
(Item H46-1)
Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)150
Twenty-two cases against Bulgaria
Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
Case, Application No.
Date of decision
DIMITROVA-MIHOVA AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 8250/05
10/05/2012
KARAVASILEVA AND 11 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 10450/05
21/02/2012
KIROVI AND 5 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 27466/05
11/09/2012
SLAVOV AND OTHERS AND 6 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 41095/05
10/05/2012
KIURKCHIAN, Application No. 45661/05
10/01/2012
DIMITROVA, Application No. 45664/05
04/10/2011
RADOMIROV AND RADOMIROVA-ERESHTENKO, Application No. 101/06
05/07/2011
NENKOV, Application No. 2671/06
30/08/2011
FIRKOV, Application No. 2731/06
31/05/2011
SOTIROV, Application No. 19985/06
03/07/2012
HEROS NORD OOD, Application No. 20405/06
30/08/2011
TAVITYAN, Application No. 24361/06
30/08/2011
STOLAROVI, Application No. 44503/06
28/06/2011
METODIEV, Application No. 6542/07
11/09/2012
BOCHUKOV AND OTHERS, Application No. 6942/07
20/03/2012
FRENKOV AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 7100/07
20/03/2012
VASILEVI AND 8 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 15423/07
03/07/2012
TSONEVA, Application No. 34587/07
11/09/2012
PETROVI, Application No. 36863/07
10/05/2012
FRENKEVA AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS, Application No. 4925/08
15/01/2013
NESHKOV (IV), Application No. 26863/08
30/08/2011
SIMEONOV, Application No. 35482/08
10/05/2012
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 September 2013
at the 1177th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;
Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and
DECIDES to close their examination.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy