Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)364
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Six cases against Hungary
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 December 2020
at the 1390th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
31577/17+
DOTENERGO ZRT. AND OTHERS
17/10/2019
17/10/2019
31845/18+
GÁLA AND OTHERS
11/07/2019
11/07/2019
21724/19
HADOBÁS
31/10/2019
31/10/2019
46030/18
KÁLOVICS
19/09/2019
19/09/2019
61394/14+
KVACSKAY AND OTHERS
17/01/2019
17/01/2019
73412/17
KUDIK
07/03/2019
07/03/2019
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the excessive length of judicial proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect (violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, and 13);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having noted the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, given that the domestic proceedings have been terminated;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Gazsó group of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy