Resolution CM/ResDH(2019)217
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Six cases against Turkey
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 September 2019 at the 1352nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
50172/06
ERKOL
19/04/2011
19/07/2011
21107/07
ALKAŞI
18/10/2016
06/03/2017
34388/05
CELIK (BOZKURT)
12/04/2011
12/07/2011
4062/07
FAZLI DİRİ
28/08/2012
28/11/2012
45028/07
KEMAL COŞKUN
28/03/2017
28/06/2017
60392/08
SEVEN
23/01/2018
23/04/2018
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in these cases primarily concern the presumption of innocence and that the Seven case also concerns the lack of adequate reasoning in domestic court judgments (this issue is being examined under the Deryan group of cases (Application No. 41721/04));
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2019)704);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy