FIRST SECTION
CASE OF FERRETTI v. ITALY
(Application no. 60660/00)
JUDGMENT
(Friendly settlement)
STRASBOURG
6 March 2003
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Ferretti v. Italy,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
MrC.L. Rozakis, President,
MrsF. Tulkens,
MrP. Lorenzen,
MrsN. Vajić,
MrE. Levits,
MrA. Kovler,
MrV. Zagrebelsky, judges,
and Mr S. Nielsen, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 13 February 2003,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in an application (no. 60660/00) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Italian national, Mrs Maria Grazia Ferretti (“the applicant”), on 3 April 2000.
2. The applicant was represented by Mr S. Romei, a lawyer practising in Florence. The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr U. Leanza, and by their co-agent, Mr F. Crisafulli.
3. The applicant complained about her prolonged inability - through lack of police assistance - to recover possession of her apartment and about the duration of the eviction proceedings.
4. On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).
5. On 18 April 2002, after obtaining the parties' observations, the Court declared the application admissible.
6. On 22 January 2003 the applicant and the Government submitted formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case.
THE FACTS
7. The applicant is the owner of an apartment in Florence, which she had let to A.L. and F.U..
8. In a writ served on the tenants on 23 December 1986, the applicant informed them that she intended to terminate the lease on expiry of the term on 31 December 1987 and summoned them to appear before the Florence Magistrate.
9. By a decision of 27 January 1987, which was made enforceable on 2 February 1987, the Florence Magistrate upheld the validity of the notice to quit and ordered that the premises be vacated by 31 December 1988.
10. On 8 June 1989, the applicant served notice on the tenants requiring them to vacate the premises.
11. On 8 July 1989, she served notice on the tenants informing them that the order for possession would be enforced by a bailiff on 7 August 1989.
12. Between 7 August 1989 and 18 February 1999, the bailiff made twenty-two attempts to recover possession.
13. Each attempt proved unsuccessful, as the applicant was not entitled to police assistance in enforcing the order for possession.
14. Pursuant to Law no. 431/98, the enforcement proceedings were suspended until 6 September 1999.
15. On 6 July 2000, the applicant recovered possession of the apartment.
THE LAW
16. On 22 January 2003 the Court received the following declaration from the Government:
“I declare that the Government of Italy offer to pay 6,085 (six thousand eighty-five) Euros to Mrs Maria Grazia Ferretti with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the application registered under no. 60660/00. This sum shall cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs, and it will be payable within three months starting from the notification of the judgment delivered by the Court pursuant to Article 39 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
This declaration does not entail any acknowledgement by the Government of a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights in the present case.
The Government further undertake not to request the referral of the case to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 § 1 of the Convention.”
17. On 22 January 2003 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant:
“I note that the Government of Italy are prepared to pay a sum totalling 6,085 (six thousand eighty-five) Euros covering both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs to Mrs Maria Grazia Ferretti with a view to securing a friendly settlement of application no. 60660/00 pending before the Court.
I accept the proposal and waive any further claims in respect of Italy relating to the facts of this application. I declare that the case is definitely settled.
This declaration is made in the context of a friendly settlement which the Government and the applicant have reached.
I further undertake not to request the referral of the case to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 § 1 of the Convention after the delivery of the Court's judgment.”
18. The Court takes note of the agreement reached between the parties (Article 39 of the Convention). It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).
19. Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Decides to strike the case out of the list;
2. Takes note of the parties' undertaking not to request a rehearing of the case before the Grand Chamber.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 March 2003, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Søren NielsenChristos Rozakis
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy