Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)143
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
18 cases against the Slovak Republic
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 April 2018
at the 1312th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
20986/10
FRANC
31/05/2012
31/05/2012
3817/07
PISKURA No. 2
16/10/2012
16/10/2012
11686/10
LADUNA
31/05/2012
31/05/2012
209/10
TRESA
02/10/2012
02/10/2012
15702/10
TNS S.R.O.
31/05/2012
31/05/2012
12583/09
HAUSER
05/02/2013
05/02/2013
13439/10
LADUNA No 2
02/10/2012
02/10/2012
23386/09
A.H.
19/02/2013
19/02/2013
59644/09
KRELA AND OTHERS
05/03/2013
05/03/2013
5718/10
LAUFIK
05/03/2013
05/03/2013
16111/11
FRIGO
08/10/2013
08/10/2013
43168/11
MAXIAN AND MAXIANOVÁ
07/01/2014
07/01/2014
74550/12
KUCEJOVÁ
26/11/2013
26/02/2014
25368/10
PALGUTOVÁ
19/02/2013
19/02/2013
32273/12
MAJTAN
19/07/2016
19/07/2016
12300/12
KESZELI
14/10/2014
14/10/2014
4603/11
CIRNEROVÁ AND OTHERS
27/06/2017
27/06/2017
65579/14
MAXIAN AND MAXIANOVÁ
20/12/2016
20/12/2016
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2017)1375);
Considering that the question of the individual measures has been resolved as the domestic judicial proceedings have come to an end or the authorities have adopted measures to accelerate the pending proceedings;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments is being examined within the framework of the group of cases Maxian and Maxianová (Application No. 44482/09) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy