Resolution CM/ResDH(2026)65
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Frroku against Albania
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 29 April 2026
at the 1558th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
30658/18
FRROKU
04/02/2025
04/02/2025
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established on account of the failure of the Constitutional Court to provide even a summary reasoning outlining the majority and minority positions in a judgment which dismissed the applicant’s constitutional complaint;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to execute the judgment (see document DH-DD(2026)360);
Considering that the question of individual measures was resolved, since the constitutional proceedings had been reopened and the applicant was provided with adequate reasons concerning the dismissal of his constitutional complaint;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Meli and Swinkles Family Brewers N.V. case also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case;
CONCLUDES that the question of individual measures has been resolved;
DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures in the Meli and Swinkles Family Brewers N.V. case;
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.