Resolution CM/ResDH(2013)164
Twenty-four cases against Poland
Execution of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
Case, Application No.
Date of decision
GALECKA, Application No. 10253/08
18/12/2012
STASZEWSKI, Application No. 20139/08
13/09/2011
SWIATOPELK-ZAWADZKI, Application No. 31176/08
20/11/2012
GOLA, Application No. 52446/08
13/11/2012
LUZAROWSKI, Application No. 19174/09
11/12/2012
KISIL, Application No. 44002/09
11/12/2012
GERTER, Application No. 47643/09
29/01/2013
SZALATY, Application No. 55239/09
29/01/2013
KOZLOWSKA, Application No. 62556/09
27/11/2012
MARMUZIEWICZ (II), Application No. 24759/10
11/12/2012
NEDZEWICZ (II), Application No. 43610/10
18/12/2012
KULAWIAK, Application No. 45170/10
12/02/2013
CHRABALOWSKA, Application No. 49252/10
27/11/2012
WROCZYNSKI, Application No. 59443/10
15/01/2013
SAWICKI, Application No. 6609/11
18/12/2012
JABLONSKI (XVII), Application No. 42421/11
11/12/2012
LESNIAK (III), Application No. 59812/11
18/12/2012
DABROWSKI, Application No. 64016/11
22/01/2013
SWIERCZ, Application No. 72189/11
11/12/2012
WOLOSOWICZ, Application No. 73358/11
29/01/2013
CIESIELSKI, Application No. 76536/11
11/12/2012
WASSERMANN, Application No. 76931/11
18/12/2012
BUDZISZEWSKI, Application No. 16544/12
29/01/2013
SOSZYNSKI, Application No. 23854/12
15/01/2013
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 September 2013
at the 1177th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;
Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and
DECIDES to close their examination.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy