Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)6
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
13 cases against Italy
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 January 2017
at the 1275th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
41576/98
GANCI
30/10/2003
30/01/2004
25498/94
MESSINA ANTONIO No. 2
28/09/2000
28/12/2000
8316/02
VIOLA
29/06/2006
29/09/2006
33695/96
MUSUMECI CARMELO
11/01/2005
06/06/2005
35795/02
ASCIUTTO
27/11/2007
07/07/2008
42285/98
SALVATORE
06/12/2005
06/03/2006
60915/00
BIFULCO
08/02/2005
08/05/2005
53723/00
GALLICO
28/06/2005
28/09/2005
56317/00
ARGENTI
10/11/2005
10/02/2006
60395/00
PAPALIA
04/12/2007
04/03/2008
74912/01
ENEA
17/09/2009
Grand Chamber
16436/02
BARBARO
16/02/2010
16/05/2010
24421/03
MOLE
12/01/2010
28/06/2010
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)1108);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy