Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)101
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
10 cases against Serbia
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 4 June 2020
at the 1377th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
60162/16
GOLIĆ AND OTHERS
03/10/2019
03/10/2019
43326/11
ISENI
09/10/2018
09/10/2018
65474/16
JOVIČIĆ
03/10/2019
03/10/2019
12312/05
KIN-STIB AND MAJKIĆ
20/04/2010
04/10/2010
54787/16
KNEŽEVIĆ AND OTHERS
09/10/2018
09/10/2018
45727/16
KOSTIĆ AND OTHERS
03/10/2019
03/10/2019
41820/16
LJAJIĆ
23/10/2018
23/10/2018
11362/17
MIHAJLOVIĆ AND OTHERS
03/10/2019
03/10/2019
55003/16
RADOVANOVIĆ AND OTHERS
27/08/2019
27/08/2019
38629/07
RAFAILOVIĆ AND STEVANOVIĆ
16/06/2015
16/09/2015
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the communication provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)392);
Noting that the respondent State took legislative measures to ensure swift enforcement of domestic decisions rendered against municipal authorities and that there have been domestic developments with respect to judicial remedies offering sufficient and adequate redress for excessive delays in enforcement of domestic judgments;
Noting that the issue of adequacy of compensation in respect of non-pecuniary damage awarded by the domestic courts for delayed enforcement of domestic decisions rendered against socially-owned companies remains under examination within the framework of the Kačapor case (Application No. 2269/06) and that the closure of the above individual cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the remaining general measures in relation to this issue;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy