FulLegal · İçtihat Detay

Macaristan 07.11.2025 EN

CASE OF HUNYADI AND OTHERS AGAINST HUNGARY AND 13 OTHER CASES

Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi

Karar Metni

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt }.sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse }.s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle }.s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt }.sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold }.s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt }.sFBC99493 { font-style:italic }.s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super }.s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }.sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse }.s9833E78A { height:12.2pt }.s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt }.s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }.sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt }.sFAC29D8B { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt }

Resolution CM/ResDH(2025)335

Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights

Fourteen cases against Hungary

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 November 2025
at the 1542nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

Application No.

Case

Date of the decision

10691/24

László HUNYADI AND 7 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/02/2025

10896/24

Endre ILLÉS AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/02/2025

14271/24

István PAPP AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/02/2025

18110/24

István Norbert ANDROVICZ AND OTHERS

13/03/2025

2018/24

Tibor ÁCS AND OTHERS AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS

07/11/2024

23956/24

Dávid ÁCS AND OTHERS

27/02/2025

24475/24

Györgyné ÁDÁM AND OTHERS

13/03/2025

28717/23

Gábor Zsolt VARGA AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

30/05/2024

30606/24

Tibor Jánosné VÉR AND OTHERS

13/03/2025

35387/23

Attila KUTKA AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/06/2024

35413/23

Zoltán SZABÓ AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/06/2024

37855/23

AEB HUNGÁRIA KFT. AND OTHERS AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/06/2024

6585/24

László SZŐLŐSI

27/02/2025

7162/24

Benedek KONCZ AND 9 OTHER APPLICATIONS

27/03/2025

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;

Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and

DECIDES to close their examination.

Full & Egal Universal Law Academy