Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)408
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Jezior against Poland
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 December 2022
at the 1452nd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
31955/11
JEZIOR
04/06/2020
04/06/2020
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established of the right to freedom of expression, as a result of the disproportionate imposition on the applicant of a series of measures in 2010 under the electoral legislation (i.e. to stop disseminating the offensive comments, to apologise by issuing a statement, to pay a sum to a charity and to pay costs and expenses) for not having prevented the publication of anonymous offensive comments on his non-commercial blog;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2022)362);
Noting that the amount of just satisfaction awarded by the Court includes, for pecuniary damage, the sums which the applicant was ordered by a domestic court to pay to a charitable organisation, as well as costs and expenses incurred in the domestic proceedings, and an award for non-pecuniary damage;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.