SECOND SECTION
CASE OF KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 49484/17 and 222 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
22 October 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kaplan and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Lorraine Schembri Orland,
Frédéric Krenc, judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their then Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 1 October 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).
2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that most of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), sharing social media posts or participating in protests in favour of FETÖ/PDY, having intensive telephone contact with FETÖ/PDY suspects, their suspension or dismissal from office, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. It further appears from the Government’s submissions that the detention orders of some applicants were based on their suspension or removal from their positions as judges or prosecutors by the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (Hakimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu – “the HSYK”) due to their suspected membership of the FETÖ/PDY. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.
3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating, in particular, their initial pre-trial detention.
6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the CCP, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.
7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 118-21, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑95), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, sharing social media posts or participating in protests in favour of FETÖ/PDY, having intensive telephone contact with FETÖ/PDY suspects, their suspension or dismissal from office, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§ 102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).
10. The Court also observes that, to the extent that some applicants’ initial pre-trial detention was based on the decisions taken by the HSYK to suspend or remove them from office, the Court has already found that such decisions were not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to them (see Baş, cited above, §§ 170-195).
11. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
OTHER COMPLAINTS12. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
13. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20 requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
14. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
15. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 61722/17, 69796/17, 20355/18, 33857/18, 33862/18, 36369/18, 37106/18, 37342/18, 37483/18, 38707/18, 38829/18, 39008/18, 43957/18, 18424/19, 21243/19, 36063/19, 36119/19, 53305/19 and 19533/20, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.Done in English, and notified in writing on 22 October 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases:
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
Represented by
1.
49484/17
Kaplan v. Türkiye
13/04/2017
Ömer KAPLAN
1991
Ludwigsburg
Turkish
Sümeyye KAPLAN
2.
61090/17
Karataş v. Türkiye
05/08/2017
Mehmet KARATAŞ
1978
Kilis
Turkish
Zernişan KARATAŞ
3.
61722/17
Şeker v. Türkiye
11/05/2017
Serkan ŞEKER
1980
Adana
Turkish
Hasan GÜR
4.
69796/17
Taşdemir v. Türkiye
09/08/2017
Ersin TAŞDEMİR
1988
Istanbul
Turkish
Budak YILDIRIM
5.
70617/17
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
05/09/2017
Ünal BOZKURT
1981
Konya
Turkish
Hilal ZAMBAKCI
6.
74831/17
İleri v. Türkiye
09/10/2017
Ferda İLERİ
1967
Ankara
Turkish
Bedia Kübra İLERİ
7.
84563/17
Kaya v. Türkiye
27/11/2017
Nurullah KAYA
1980
Çorum
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
8.
82/18
Koçyiğit v. Türkiye
28/11/2017
Atilla KOÇYİĞİT
1980
Ankara
Turkish
Hakkı KAYNAR
9.
3458/18
Dur v. Türkiye
04/01/2018
Bahattin DUR
1975
Erzurum
Turkish
Sebahattin DUR
10.
6946/18
Özkan v. Türkiye
12/01/2018
İlyas ÖZKAN
1969
Eskişehir
Turkish
Hüseyin Mahir ERDOĞMUŞ
11.
10288/18
Ertem v. Türkiye
31/01/2018
Yusuf ERTEM
1988
Ankara
Turkish
Burak ÇOLAK
12.
10773/18
Ulukapı v. Türkiye
07/02/2018
Ömer ULUKAPI
1962
Konya
Turkish
Mehmet Turgay BİLGE
13.
12045/18
Özgür v. Türkiye
02/03/2018
Güray ÖZGÜR
1985
Bursa
Turkish
14.
16810/18
Açlan v. Türkiye
30/03/2018
Yener AÇLAN
1974
Adıyaman
Turkish
Gülhis YÖRÜK
15.
17289/18
Arslanbay v. Türkiye
29/03/2018
Davut ARSLANBAY
1986
Samsun
Turkish
Hatice ARSLANBAY
16.
17687/18
Evgin v. Türkiye
06/04/2018
Coșkun EVGİN
1980
Antalya
Turkish
Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
17.
18046/18
Harmancı v. Türkiye
13/04/2018
Fatih Mehmet HARMANCI
1957
Ankara
Turkish
18.
18692/18
Sekizkardeş v. Türkiye
03/04/2018
Ahmet Metin SEKİZKARDEŞ
1967
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
19.
20355/18
Doğdu v. Türkiye
17/04/2018
Yusuf DOĞDU
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Faruk DEMİRKAPI
20.
21909/18
Karayeğen v. Türkiye
02/05/2018
İbrahim KARAYEĞEN
1965
Istanbul
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
21.
23493/18
Çevik v. Türkiye
30/04/2018
Metin ÇEVİK
1977
Kütahya
Turkish
Nurten ÇEVİK
22.
23568/18
Akkuzey v. Türkiye
25/04/2018
Harun AKKUZEY
1980
Keskin / Kırıkkale
Turkish
23.
23758/18
Ballı v. Türkiye
07/05/2018
Bahtiyar BALLI
1954
Istanbul
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
24.
23822/18
Özcan v. Türkiye
03/05/2018
Efrahim ÖZCAN
1971
Istanbul
Turkish
Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
25.
23912/18
Özkökeli v. Türkiye
04/05/2018
Hakan ÖZKÖKELİ
1973
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Rana Nuran ODABAŞI
26.
23919/18
Özdemir v. Türkiye
04/05/2018
İsmail ÖZDEMİR
1975
Kayseri
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
27.
24612/18
Sazil v. Türkiye
15/05/2018
Selami SAZİL
1972
Osmaniye
Turkish
Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU
28.
24900/18
Parlak v. Türkiye
18/05/2018
Celil PARLAK
1971
Konya
Turkish
Mustafa DEMİR
29.
24919/18
Bozdağ v. Türkiye
17/05/2018
Ertuğrul BOZDAĞ
1970
Ankara
Turkish
İsmail Hakkı BAYAR
30.
25066/18
Bayraktar v. Türkiye
15/05/2018
Eyüp BAYRAKTAR
1971
Kütahya
Turkish
Engin SEMİN
31.
25241/18
Tekeci v. Türkiye
15/05/2018
Hüseyin TEKECİ
1989
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Dilara YILMAZ
32.
25253/18
Mete v. Türkiye
18/05/2018
Cihan METE
1980
Konya
Turkish
Özgün METE
33.
25893/18
Eroğlu v. Türkiye
28/05/2018
Muhammet EROĞLU
1987
Çankaya
Turkish
Yasemin Berna ASLANBAY
34.
26402/18
Karlı v. Türkiye
26/05/2018
Veli KARLI
1978
Onikişubat / Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
Emre KOZANDAĞI
35.
27732/18
Uçkan v. Türkiye
28/05/2018
Murat UÇKAN
1993
Van
Turkish
Elif KANDİLLİ
36.
29785/18
Güzel v. Türkiye
08/06/2018
Ebubekir GÜZEL
1987
Osmaniye
Turkish
İhsan MAKAS
37.
32458/18
Dağdeviren v. Türkiye
28/06/2018
Ümit DAĞDEVİREN
1976
Denizli
Turkish
Ahmet KOCABAŞ
38.
32460/18
Beydoğan v. Türkiye
22/06/2018
Turgut Ayhan BEYDOĞAN
1962
Voorhees
Turkish
39.
32462/18
Dalkes v. Türkiye
21/06/2018
Mehmet DALKES
1986
Sakarya
Turkish
40.
32465/18
Peker v. Türkiye
22/06/2018
Muhammed Enes PEKER
1985
Mersin
Turkish
Seyyit Hasan PEKER
41.
32617/18
Özdemir v. Türkiye
25/06/2018
Kamil ÖZDEMİR
1977
Çanakkale
Turkish
Zühal YÜZÜAK ÖZDEMİR
42.
32874/18
Kafa v. Türkiye
22/06/2018
Yusuf KAFA
1985
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
43.
32910/18
Doğan v. Türkiye
02/07/2018
Selami DOĞAN
1984
Kirıkkale
Turkish
Mustafa DOĞAN
44.
32949/18
Kalkan v. Türkiye
04/07/2018
Adil KALKAN
1979
Yozgat
Turkish
Havva Züleyha ARSLAN
45.
32965/18
Erken v. Türkiye
26/06/2018
Hasan ERKEN
1979
Kırıkkale
Turkish
Şükran ERKEN
46.
32970/18
Hasırcı v. Türkiye
04/07/2018
Cengiz HASIRCI
1986
Eskişehir
Turkish
Şahin HASIRCI
47.
33003/18
Persil v. Türkiye
26/06/2018
Yıldıray PERSİL
1975
Ankara
Turkish
İsmet ÇELİK
48.
33009/18
Sezer v. Türkiye
02/07/2018
Fatih SEZER
1975
Bursa
Turkish
49.
33043/18
Harmankaya v. Türkiye
26/06/2018
Recep HARMANKAYA
1972
Konya
Turkish
Nazlı HARMANKAYA DİNÇER
50.
33046/18
Erdoğdu v. Türkiye
26/06/2018
Salih ERDOĞDU
1979
Adana
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
51.
33156/18
Arslan v. Türkiye
18/06/2018
Yılmaz ARSLAN
1967
Ankara
Turkish
Furkan ARSLAN
52.
33330/18
Kablan v. Türkiye
11/07/2018
Ali KABLAN
1978
Denizli
Turkish
Ahmet KOCABAŞ
53.
33836/18
Demir v. Türkiye
16/03/2018
Mehmet DEMİR
1987
Adana
Turkish
Belma KAYRAN
54.
33856/18
Taç v. Türkiye
03/07/2018
Ahmet TAÇ
1987
Kütahya
Turkish
Furkan BURHAN
55.
33857/18
Koçlar v. Türkiye
09/07/2018
Mehmet KOÇLAR
1977
Denizli
Turkish
Ahmet KOCABAŞ
56.
33862/18
Akbey v. Türkiye
05/07/2018
Mehmet Ümit AKBEY
1971
Istanbul
Turkish
57.
33972/18
Erdemir v. Türkiye
28/06/2018
Nesli Zeynep ERDEMİR
1963
İzmir
Turkish
Melda ALBUZ
58.
34180/18
Toygar v. Türkiye
07/07/2018
Alperen TOYGAR
1986
Mersin
Turkish
Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
59.
34184/18
Demir v. Türkiye
07/07/2018
Ahmet DEMİR
1974
Mersin
Turkish
Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
60.
34190/18
Cebeci v. Türkiye
03/07/2018
Abdullah CEBECİ
1965
Istanbul
Turkish
Yavuz YEŞİLYURT
61.
34413/18
Kaplan v. Türkiye
26/02/2018
Yalçın KAPLAN
1970
Ankara
Turkish
Lale KARADAŞ
62.
34565/18
Güngör v. Türkiye
17/07/2018
Akif GÜNGÖR
1978
Ankara
Turkish
Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
63.
34765/18
Gülümser v. Türkiye
16/07/2018
Semih GÜLÜMSER
1987
Bursa
Turkish
Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
64.
35118/18
Uçar v. Türkiye
10/07/2018
Mehmet Emin UÇAR
1974
Osmaniye
Turkish
65.
35188/18
Şimşek v. Türkiye
06/07/2018
Taner ŞİMŞEK
1991
Antalya
Turkish
Kamile KILDAN
66.
35191/18
Çatal v. Türkiye
07/07/2018
Ümit ÇATAL
1977
Malatya
Turkish
Bülent BANAZILI
67.
35293/18
Aktaş v. Türkiye
16/07/2018
Halil AKTAŞ
1986
Mülheim
Turkish
Büşra DİNÇER
68.
35427/18
Yapan v. Türkiye
05/07/2018
Murat YAPAN
1974
Zonguldak
Turkish
Ahmet ÖZDİN
69.
35446/18
Taşdemir v. Türkiye
03/07/2018
Hüseyin TAŞDEMİR
1975
Şanlıurfa
Turkish
Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
70.
35548/18
Danış v. Türkiye
18/07/2018
Bilal DANIŞ
1990
İzmir
Turkish
71.
35621/18
Aydın v. Türkiye
12/07/2018
Yavuz AYDIN
1985
Antalya
Turkish
İshak IŞIK
72.
35642/18
Yivli v. Türkiye
20/07/2018
Hayati YİVLİ
1972
Ankara
Turkish
Halil ŞAHİN
73.
35661/18
Sarıca v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Ahmet SARICA
1982
Denizli
Turkish
Bilal Eren MASKAN
74.
35671/18
Gürler v. Türkiye
09/07/2018
Mücahit GÜRLER
1980
Odunpazarı / ESKİŞEHİR
Turkish
Ömer Yasin KORU
75.
35694/18
Karagülmez v. Türkiye
13/07/2018
Fevzi KARAGÜLMEZ
1976
Ankara
Turkish
Hidayet KARAGÜLMEZ
76.
35707/18
Tokar v. Türkiye
11/07/2018
Mustafa TOKAR
1990
Van
Turkish
Hatice Kübra EKİCİ
77.
35958/18
Sarı v. Türkiye
23/07/2018
Mustafa SARI
1974
Ankara
Turkish
Ömer MANTI
78.
36107/18
Bağcı v. Türkiye
24/07/2018
Süleyman BAĞCI
1977
Konya
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
79.
36169/18
Can v. Türkiye
24/07/2018
Engin CAN
1974
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Mehmet Ertürk ERDEVİR
80.
36236/18
Tümer v. Türkiye
16/07/2018
Yusuf TÜMER
1986
Ankara
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
81.
36275/18
Kurt v. Türkiye
16/07/2018
Halil KURT
1987
Kütahya
Turkish
Enes ÖZTÜRK
82.
36369/18
Gençer v. Türkiye
17/07/2018
Muhammed Fatih GENÇER
1975
Antalya
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
83.
36636/18
Demir v. Türkiye
11/07/2018
Nevzat DEMİR
1975
Tokat
Turkish
Şeyma MISIRLIOĞLU
84.
37106/18
Ayık v. Türkiye
06/07/2018
Kağan Serhan AYIK
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Süleyman Serdar BALKANLI
85.
37242/18
Avcu v. Türkiye
18/07/2018
Arif AVCU
1976
Çorum
Turkish
Kübra KAZANCI TOSUN
86.
37271/18
Erol v. Türkiye
02/08/2018
Mustafa EROL
1973
Ankara
Turkish
Ahmet EROL
87.
37342/18
Üzel v. Türkiye
02/08/2018
Ferhat ÜZEL
1972
Ankara
Turkish
Özgür KUMAŞ
88.
37483/18
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
26/07/2018
Suat YILMAZ
1973
Ankara
Turkish
89.
37723/18
Kambur v. Türkiye
30/07/2018
Vedat KAMBUR
1968
Manisa
Turkish
Hüseyin ÖZÇELİK
90.
37838/18
Ulusu v. Türkiye
03/08/2018
Mustafa ULUSU
1973
Manisa
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
91.
38511/18
Gülver v. Türkiye
06/08/2018
Murat GÜLVER
1972
Yalova
Turkish
Burhan DEMİRCİ
92.
38636/18
Şahin v. Türkiye
02/08/2018
Ömer ŞAHİN
1974
Eskişehir
Turkish
Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ
93.
38707/18
Akbacak v. Türkiye
06/08/2018
Muhammet AKBACAK
1994
Ankara
Turkish
Özgür KUMAŞ
94.
38766/18
Mayda v. Türkiye
03/08/2018
Yusuf MAYDA
1964
Ankara
Turkish
Veysel MAYDA
95.
38788/18
Akın v. Türkiye
06/08/2018
Nilgün AKIN
1962
Kayseri
Turkish
Nilgün ÖĞÜNÇLÜ
96.
38829/18
Yollu v. Türkiye
30/07/2018
Mustafa YOLLU
1971
Çanakkale
Turkish
Gökmen İLHAN
97.
38953/18
Karakaş v. Türkiye
09/08/2018
Niyazi KARAKAŞ
1977
Manisa
Turkish
Asım Burak GÜNEŞ
98.
38978/18
Aşık v. Türkiye
03/08/2018
Ökkeş AŞIK
1983
Ankara
Turkish
99.
39008/18
Çeken v. Türkiye
09/08/2018
Selim ÇEKEN
1988
Kocaeli
Turkish
100.
39038/18
Tunç v. Türkiye
03/08/2018
Selami TUNÇ
1981
Kocaeli
Turkish
İsmail ÇELİK
101.
39098/18
Ünal v. Türkiye
11/07/2018
Ömer ÜNAL
1980
Zonguldak
Turkish
Nazike ÜNAL
102.
41128/18
Yayla v. Türkiye
09/08/2018
Sadık YAYLA
1984
Uşak
Turkish
Nihat KILIÇ
103.
42382/18
Çetintaş v. Türkiye
04/09/2018
Ümit ÇETİNTAŞ
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Esra GURLAŞ
104.
43239/18
Tümüklü v. Türkiye
08/09/2018
Tayfun TÜMÜKLÜ
1971
Çorum
Turkish
Yakup GÖNEN
105.
43957/18
Akpınar v. Türkiye
05/09/2018
Adem AKPINAR
1992
Eskişehir
Turkish
106.
44166/18
Karagöz v. Türkiye
11/09/2018
Tevfik KARAGÖZ
1980
İzmir
Turkish
Hanifi BAYRI
107.
45288/18
Şahin v. Türkiye
19/09/2018
Kemal ŞAHİN
1972
Istanbul
Turkish
Fatih ŞAHİNLER
108.
45911/18
Şeker v. Türkiye
22/09/2018
Emrah ŞEKER
1983
Tokat
Turkish
Arzu Sema YALÇIN
109.
50048/18
Demirtaş v. Türkiye
12/10/2018
Şaban DEMİRTAŞ
1970
Düzce
Turkish
Betül KAYA
110.
53396/18
Coşkun v. Türkiye
31/10/2018
Ahmet Atilla COŞKUN
1980
Osmaniye
Turkish
Ayşe ARAS KÜÇÜKDEVLET
111.
58245/18
Orhan v. Türkiye
22/11/2018
İlhan ORHAN
1974
Malatya
Turkish
112.
2270/19
Erdoğuş v. Türkiye
30/11/2018
Şemun ERDOĞUŞ
1961
İzmir
Turkish
113.
2275/19
Uludağ v. Türkiye
19/12/2018
Mehmet ULUDAĞ
1985
Istanbul
Turkish
Meryem YAŞAR KARAYAZGAN
114.
2514/19
Salman v. Türkiye
17/12/2018
Halit SALMAN
1973
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Tevfik KARTAL
115.
4188/19
Soytekin v. Türkiye
11/01/2019
Tanju SOYTEKİN
1977
İzmit
Turkish
Ahmet EROL
116.
6739/19
Sertkaya v. Türkiye
24/01/2019
Nureda SERTKAYA
1982
Tekirdağ
Turkish
117.
6822/19
Çetin v. Türkiye
17/01/2019
İlhan ÇETİN
1974
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ
118.
6904/19
Özçimen v. Türkiye
16/01/2019
İbrahim ÖZÇİMEN
1960
Düzce
Turkish
Nezahat ÖZÇİMEN
119.
7441/19
Söker v. Türkiye
16/01/2019
Ğarip SÖKER
1981
Ankara
Turkish
İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU)
120.
12039/19
Alaf v. Türkiye
19/02/2019
Bayram ALAF
1975
Ankara
Turkish
121.
12470/19
Bulut v. Türkiye
22/02/2019
Mehmet Ali BULUT
1986
İzmir
Turkish
Akif Fikri TOMAN
122.
12701/19
Kuş v. Türkiye
20/02/2019
Sebahattin KUŞ
1970
Ankara
Turkish
Adem DEMİREL
123.
12712/19
Keskin v. Türkiye
19/02/2019
Halit KESKİN
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Elif Nurbanu OR
124.
13014/19
Ekici v. Türkiye
21/02/2019
İkram EKİCİ
Antalya
Turkish
Suat Erhan DAYIOĞLU
125.
13224/19
Eken v. Türkiye
26/02/2019
Fatih EKEN
1982
Konya
Turkish
Muhammed Talha YILMAZ
126.
14154/19
Mert v. Türkiye
02/03/2019
Ramazan MERT
1986
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Ahmet ZEYBEKOĞLU
127.
14269/19
Yeni v. Türkiye
01/03/2019
Ünsal YENİ
1982
Aydın
Turkish
Zeynep Sedef ÖZDOĞAN
128.
14495/19
Çağlı v. Türkiye
11/03/2019
Bilal ÇAĞLI
1991
Denizli
Turkish
İsmail KAPLAN
129.
14500/19
Günay v. Türkiye
25/02/2019
Habip GÜNAY
1983
Düzce
Turkish
Sema GÜNAY
130.
14949/19
Biçer v. Türkiye
07/03/2019
Osman BİÇER
1990
Çorum
Turkish
Selma BİÇER
131.
15202/19
Akdın v. Türkiye
07/03/2019
Murat AKDIN
1984
Aydın
Turkish
Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
132.
15308/19
Kahraman v. Türkiye
25/02/2019
Ferhat KAHRAMAN
1981
Çankırı
Turkish
Enes Burak ÖZDEMİR
133.
16007/19
Çelik v. Türkiye
15/03/2019
Mehmet ÇELİK
1985
Ankara
Turkish
Ulviye Özge CAZ ÖZKAYA
134.
16290/19
Dalan v. Türkiye
04/03/2019
Mustafa DALAN
1983
Kastamonu
Turkish
Ahmet Aykut YILDIZ
135.
16685/19
Sucu v. Türkiye
21/03/2019
Mehmet Alim SUCU
1990
Mersin
Turkish
Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
136.
16909/19
Günerigök v. Türkiye
08/03/2019
Hamza GÜNERİGÖK
1987
Adana
Turkish
Arafat SAV
137.
17210/19
Demirağ v. Türkiye
14/03/2019
Mustafa DEMIRAĞ
1984
Bolu
Turkish
Merve Vildan DUMAN
138.
17275/19
Karabudak v. Türkiye
15/03/2019
İlhan KARABUDAK
1972
İzmir
Turkish
Kadriye Nur AYTAÇ
139.
18420/19
Demirci v. Türkiye
15/03/2019
Yakup DEMİRCİ
1984
Kars
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
140.
18424/19
Köse v. Türkiye
12/03/2019
Hasan KÖSE
1976
İzmir
Turkish
141.
18452/19
Soykan v. Türkiye
29/03/2019
Sinan SOYKAN
1978
Antalya
Turkish
İshak IŞIK
142.
18475/19
Özer v. Türkiye
26/03/2019
Mustafa ÖZER
1973
İzmir
Turkish
Fatma Nur TARAMIŞ
143.
18628/19
Yavuz v. Türkiye
26/03/2019
Zeynal YAVUZ
1982
Mersin
Turkish
Neslihan ÖZATLI SOĞUK
144.
18747/19
Sertçe v. Türkiye
25/03/2019
Selahattin SERTÇE
1973
Istanbul
Turkish
Lale KARADAŞ
145.
20131/19
Selvi v. Türkiye
01/04/2019
Abdullah SELVİ
1986
Afyon
Turkish
Şirin DEMİR
146.
20295/19
Uzekmek v. Türkiye
11/04/2019
Hüseyin UZEKMEK
1965
Sakarya
Turkish
Savaş Barış PEKER
147.
20316/19
Kaya v. Türkiye
06/04/2019
Fatih Mehmet KAYA
1970
Ankara
Turkish
Cemile Sabine DOĞAN
148.
21147/19
Şener v. Türkiye
26/02/2019
İsmail ŞENER
1976
Istanbul
Turkish
Vahide ŞENER
149.
21166/19
Bağlan v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Süleyman BAĞLAN
1984
Hatay
Turkish
Begüm Merve AÇIKGÖZ
150.
21212/19
Koka v. Türkiye
22/03/2019
İhsan KOKA
1981
Antalya
Turkish
Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
151.
21243/19
Kayhan v. Türkiye
11/04/2019
Akın KAYHAN
1965
Uşak
Turkish
Hüseyin TÜRKMEN
152.
21537/19
Uzal v. Türkiye
29/03/2019
Muharrem UZAL
1974
Sinop
Turkish
153.
21665/19
Yıldırım v. Türkiye
03/04/2019
Mahmut YILDIRIM
1985
Düzce
Turkish
Kübra YILDIRIM
154.
21696/19
Çiçek v. Türkiye
16/04/2019
Bedretin ÇİÇEK
1981
Şanlıurfa
Turkish
Melek KOÇYİĞİT
155.
22197/19
Taştan v. Türkiye
16/04/2019
Halil TAŞTAN
1985
Şanlıurfa
Turkish
Gülistan TAŞTAN
156.
22341/19
Köse v. Türkiye
19/04/2019
Davut KÖSE
1976
Uşak
Turkish
Ayşe KÖSE
157.
22882/19
Yiğit v. Türkiye
17/04/2019
Orhan YİĞİT
1990
Samsun
Turkish
Fatih İNCELER
158.
23652/19
Arıöz v. Türkiye
12/04/2019
Mahmut İlker ARIÖZ
1973
Niğde
Turkish
Ahmet Oğuz ÖZMEN
159.
24558/19
Şener v. Türkiye
25/04/2019
Bülent ŞENER
1974
Samsun
Turkish
Mehmet Fatih İÇER
160.
24961/19
Sözen v. Türkiye
30/04/2019
Yusuf SÖZEN
1979
Turkish
Ekrem KAYA
161.
27557/19
Çıtız v. Türkiye
07/05/2019
Nezih ÇITIZ
1977
Elazığ
Turkish
Mehmet Sıddık KARAGÖZ
162.
27781/19
L.T. v. Türkiye
10/05/2019
L.T.
1979
İzmir
Turkish
Arzu DEMİRCİ
163.
27956/19
Görüşen v. Türkiye
06/05/2019
Hüseyin GÖRÜŞEN
1968
Gaziantep
Turkish
Mehmet Fatih İÇER
164.
27979/19
Eroğlu v. Türkiye
14/05/2019
Murat EROĞLU
1985
Ankara
Turkish
İrem GÜNEŞ (DANACIOĞLU)
165.
29371/19
Akyol v. Türkiye
24/04/2019
Yusuf AKYOL
1966
Aydın
Turkish
Esra Nur AKYOL
166.
30306/19
Özdemir v. Türkiye
27/05/2019
Galip ÖZDEMİR
1962
İzmir
Turkish
Mine ÖZTÜRK
167.
30320/19
Demir v. Türkiye
22/05/2019
Hakan DEMİR
1972
İzmir
Turkish
Aslıhan EKER
168.
30361/19
Gürsu v. Türkiye
20/05/2019
Emrah GÜRSU
1988
Elazığ
Turkish
Abdullah GÜRSU
169.
33066/19
Terzi v. Türkiye
21/05/2019
Murat TERZİ
1971
Ankara
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
170.
33099/19
Çimentepe v. Türkiye
31/05/2019
Mahir ÇİMENTEPE
1973
Ankara
Turkish
Utku Coşkuner SAKARYA
171.
33785/19
Demirci v. Türkiye
16/05/2019
Zeki DEMİRCİ
1955
Keçiören
Turkish
Mehmet Emin DEMİRCİ
172.
35017/19
Kömürcü v. Türkiye
02/07/2019
Halim KÖMÜRCÜ
1971
Manisa
Turkish
Zeyt Enes KÖMÜRCÜ
173.
35208/19
Ayaz v. Türkiye
14/06/2019
Harun AYAZ
1982
Ankara
Turkish
Alperen ORAK
174.
35390/19
Kılıç v. Türkiye
21/06/2019
Bekir KILIÇ
1979
Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
175.
36063/19
Gürçay v. Türkiye
22/06/2019
Özcan GÜRÇAY
1983
Istanbul
Turkish
Merve GÜRÇAY
176.
36119/19
Gülmez v. Türkiye
29/05/2019
Ömer GÜLMEZ
1981
Yozgat
Turkish
Mustafa GÜLMEZ
177.
36167/19
Cevri v. Türkiye
19/06/2019
Adem CEVRİ
1983
Gaziantep
Turkish
Mehmet Sıddık KARAGÖZ
178.
36225/19
Acartürk v. Türkiye
03/07/2019
Ertuğrul ACARTÜRK
1971
Aydın
Turkish
Bedirhan ACARTÜRK
179.
36532/19
Genç v. Türkiye
25/06/2019
Abdurrahman GENÇ
1973
Denizli
Turkish
Hamdi YAKUT
180.
37003/19
Yavuz v. Türkiye
02/07/2019
Serkan YAVUZ
1974
Antalya
Turkish
Zaliha VARLI
181.
38657/19
Kayaaltı v. Türkiye
18/07/2019
Yalçın KAYAALTI
1971
Aydın
Turkish
182.
40373/19
Kurak v. Türkiye
18/07/2019
Nurevşan KURAK
1994
Malatya
Turkish
Gülsüm EKİNCİ
183.
46761/19
Akdemir v. Türkiye
02/09/2019
Tayfur AKDEMİR
1985
Ankara
Turkish
Tuğba Nur KIYMAZ
184.
48665/19
Kenan v. Türkiye
13/09/2019
Hayrettin KENAN
1979
Istanbul
Turkish
Burak ÇAĞ
185.
50842/19
Çöpcü v. Türkiye
27/08/2019
Selami ÇÖPCÜ
1974
Samsun
Turkish
Ünver ÖZGÜL
186.
52327/19
Yeşilbaş v. Türkiye
03/09/2019
Mehmet YEŞİLBAŞ
1975
Ordu
Turkish
Nihat KILIÇ
187.
53305/19
Aygün v. Türkiye
27/09/2019
Hulusi AYGÜN
1974
Tekirdağ
Turkish
Veysel MALKOÇ
188.
53731/19
Gezgin v. Türkiye
07/10/2019
Mustafa GEZGİN
1971
Denizli
Turkish
Gültekin AKKURT
189.
56692/19
Uşan v. Türkiye
16/10/2019
Osman Asım UŞAN
1987
Aydın
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
190.
59970/19
Karakurt v. Türkiye
07/11/2019
Bilal KARAKURT
1979
Bursa
Turkish
Çiğdem DERDİYOK KUBULAN
191.
61190/19
Toparlak v. Türkiye
08/11/2019
Cemcenker TOPARLAK
1972
Samsun
Turkish
Yakup GÖNEN
192.
62700/19
Özer v. Türkiye
29/11/2019
Mehmet ÖZER
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Sumru AKTAŞ
193.
1379/20
Kaan v. Türkiye
17/12/2019
İsmail KAAN
1976
İzmir
Turkish
İsa KAYA
194.
2913/20
Pala v. Türkiye
26/12/2019
Zeynep PALA
1979
Malatya
Turkish
Merve TURAN TÜRKOĞLU
195.
5593/20
Çelik v. Türkiye
15/01/2020
Safa ÇELİK
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Yakup GÖNEN
196.
7005/20
Cuma v. Türkiye
17/01/2020
Ahmet CUMA
1972
Aydın
Turkish
Zeynep Sedef ÖZDOĞAN
197.
7583/20
Çetin v. Türkiye
27/01/2020
Emre ÇETİN
1991
Istanbul
Turkish
Ahmet EROL
198.
8206/20
Etgül v. Türkiye
24/01/2020
Sezgin ETGÜL
1984
Diyarbakır
Turkish
Özcan BARUT
199.
8725/20
Gülümser v. Türkiye
07/02/2020
Ahmet GÜLÜMSER
1974
Istanbul
Turkish
Budak YILDIRIM
200.
11513/20
Çelikkaya v. Türkiye
19/02/2020
Ahmet ÇELİKKAYA
1968
Bolu
Turkish
Mebruke Şeyma ÇELİKKAYA
201.
19533/20
Ünal v. Türkiye
11/05/2020
Ali ÜNAL
1977
Trabzon
Turkish
Hatice YILMAZ
202.
19966/20
Ekinci v. Türkiye
13/08/2020
Harun EKİNCİ
1977
Ankara
Turkish
Özcan BARUT
203.
23623/20
Çakır v. Türkiye
15/05/2020
Feyhan ÇAKIR
1980
İzmir
Turkish
Levent KAHYA
204.
24400/20
Döşer v. Türkiye
15/06/2020
Taha Murat DÖŞER
1982
Istanbul
Turkish
Cahit ÇİFTÇİ
205.
25204/20
Bülbül v. Türkiye
05/06/2020
Yusuf BÜLBÜL
1981
İzmir
Turkish
İsa KAYA
206.
26138/20
Trakyalı v. Türkiye
18/06/2020
Halil TRAKYALI
1983
Manisa
Turkish
Levent KAHYA
207.
30992/20
Tatoğlu v. Türkiye
06/07/2020
Yakup TATOĞLU
1969
Düzce
Turkish
Melda ALBUZ
208.
34736/20
Mercan v. Türkiye
07/08/2020
Yusuf MERCAN
1983
Yozgat
Turkish
Kübra KAZANCI TOSUN
209.
36649/20
Karakoç v. Türkiye
07/08/2020
Mustafa KARAKOÇ
1980
Elazığ
Turkish
Özcan AKINCI
210.
43535/20
Aydın v. Türkiye
28/09/2020
Fahrittin AYDIN
1977
Bolu
Turkish
Mebruke Şeyma ÇELİKKAYA
211.
43956/20
Dündar v. Türkiye
24/09/2020
Caner DÜNDAR
1976
Ankara
Turkish
Hasan TOK
212.
46450/20
Kocagümüş v. Türkiye
09/10/2020
Gülsüm KOCAGÜMÜŞ
1972
İzmir
Turkish
Kadriye TÜMEN
213.
50838/20
Bukan v. Türkiye
05/11/2020
Mesut BUKAN
1985
Ankara
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
214.
51282/20
Güçlü v. Türkiye
15/11/2019
Aykut GÜÇLÜ
1977
Ankara
Turkish
Okan GÜNEL
215.
51931/20
Altun v. Türkiye
18/08/2020
Harun ALTUN
1979
Ankara
Turkish
Yakup GÖNEN
216.
53937/20
Çaputcu v. Türkiye
13/11/2020
Mehmet ÇAPUTCU
1981
Muğla
Turkish
Muhammet Taha SEVİLİ
217.
54367/20
Bilgiç v. Türkiye
30/11/2020
Mustafa BİLGİÇ
1986
Kastamonu
Turkish
Hamit Serdar YILMAZ
218.
142/21
Deyer v. Türkiye
02/12/2020
Selim DEYER
1989
Eskişehir
Turkish
Okan GÜNEL
219.
2607/21
Sevinç v. Türkiye
22/12/2020
Murat SEVİNÇ
1982
İzmir
Turkish
Kadriye TÜMEN
220.
14169/21
Demirhan v. Türkiye
10/03/2021
Nazife DEMİRHAN
1974
İzmir
Turkish
Kübra GÜLAÇTI
221.
20454/21
Güler v. Türkiye
06/04/2021
Yakup GÜLER
1984
Ankara
Turkish
Numan ZEMHERİ
222.
21688/21
Doğan v. Türkiye
08/04/2021
Betül DOĞAN
1990
Gebze
Turkish
Tufan YILMAZ
223.
39388/21
Gül v. Türkiye
16/07/2021
Abdulkadir GÜL
1987
Ankara
Turkish
Asiye KÜÇÜKBALCI