FIRST SECTION
CASE OF KARPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 11042/19 and 49 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
27 April 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Karpov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lətif Hüseynov, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Erik Wennerström, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 6 April 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of country-wide protests against retirement age hike organised by Aleksey Navalnyy on 9 September 2018. The applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
Jurisdiction6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and/or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies, and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 61-65, 13 February 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to administrative escorting to and detention in a police station beyond three hours without any justification; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, related to the absence of a prosecuting party in criminal proceedings governed by the Code of Administrative Offences (“the CAO”).
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.
15. Firstly, the Court considers that, in view of its findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints raised by some applicants under Article 5 of the Convention with regard to their alleged deprivation of liberty and Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings.
16. Furthermore, the Court has examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention.
17. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION18. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
19. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 April 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Location
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]
11042/19
06/02/2019
Vitaliy Gennadyevich KARPOV
1989
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
09/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled; arrested at 6.40 p.m. on 09/09/2018, detention recorded at 7 p.m., released at 10.07 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
12551/19
21/02/2019
Yelena Aeksandrovna GUSEVA
1967
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
11/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.50 p.m. on 09/09/2018, detention recorded at 7 p.m., released at 10.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
13234/19
21/02/2019
Sergey Viktorovich MOSALEV
1957
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Ufa
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic
08/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
13767/19
28/02/2019
Sergey Viktorovich BALDIN
1989
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
11/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.09 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 8.50 p.m., released at unknown time on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
14717/19
04/03/2019
Andrey Konstantinovich PYSTOGOV
1996
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
community work of 80 hours
Perm Regional Court
12/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 8.05 p.m., released at 12.45 p.m. on 11/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
14935/19
28/02/2019
Antonina Nikolayevna ANUSHINA
1981
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention of 2 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 7.45 p.m., released at 10 a.m. on 11/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
5,000
15041/19
04/03/2019
Dmitriy Vyongovich NGUYEN
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
16/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.45 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to a police station at 6.10 p.m., released at 10.07 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
15092/19
06/03/2019
Vasiliy Mikhaylovich DANILOV
1989
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Tver
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Tver Regional Court
17/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –arrest, escorting to and detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested and brought to police station at 3 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 1.00 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
15403/19
11/03/2019
Ivan Konstantinovich SABREKOV
2000
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
community work of 50 hours
Perm Regional Court
22/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 8.55 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
15666/19
04/03/2019
Kirill Aleksandrovich STRIKHA
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention of 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
16/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 10.40 p.m., released at 10.25 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
5,000
16054/19
11/03/2019
Aleksandr Konstantinovich SABREKOV
1997
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
community work of 60 days
Perm Regional Court
23/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 8.25 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
17020/19
15/03/2019
Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich PROSKURIN
1988
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Lipetsk
Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
18/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO.
4,000
18965/19
11/03/2019
Konstantin Nasyrovich SABREKOV
1964
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
community work of 20 hours
Perm Regional Court
24/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to a police station at 8.20 p.m., released at 3 p.m. on 11/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
19087/19
13/03/2019
Dmitriy Anatolyevich KULYASOV
1990
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Lipetsk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
18/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19617/19
02/04/2019
Mikhail Pavlovich STRIKHAR
1969
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
15/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested and brought to police station at 4 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 8.50 p.m. according to the Government or at 12.30 a.m. on 10/09/2018 according to the applicant;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19724/19
01/04/2019
Marina Valeryevna KUNAKH
1971
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
14/02/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 2 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to a police station at 3 p.m., released at 11.17 p.m.;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19792/19
01/04/2019
Viktor Viktorovich SANZHENAKOV
1974
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Samara
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
20/12/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
3,500
19845/19
02/04/2019
Darya Sergeyevna PLESHAKOVA
1984
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Khabarovsk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
23/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19851/19
02/04/2019
Mariya Aleksandrovna SEMENYUK
1986
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Ekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
12/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19893/19
01/04/2019
Yelena Mikhaylovna KUPRIYANOVA
1991
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
20/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.27 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 7 p.m., released in the morning on 10/09/2018 as alleged by the applicant;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
19944/19
02/04/2019
Dmitriy Viktorovich SEMENYUK
1992
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
25/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
19958/19
02/04/2018
Sergey Anatolyevich ZAYTSEV
1964
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 7 p.m., released late in the evening on that day;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
19999/19
01/04/2019
Anna Vladimirovna BALDINA
1991
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
15/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.03 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to a police station at 8.50 p.m., released at 2.45 p.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
20002/19
02/04/2019
Ivan Nikolayevich VOLKOV
1984
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
25/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20029/19
01/04/2019
Ivan Vladimirovich KOCHKIN
1989
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Perm Regional Court
08/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
3,500
20075/19
01/04/2019
Yevgeniy Valeryevich SVETLOV
1980
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Belgorod
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community work of 40 hours
Belgorod Regional Court
29/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20118/19
01/04/2019
Vadim Borisovich LIVSHITS
1968
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
07/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20163/19
05/04/2019
Dmitriy Vyacheslavovich CHIRMAN
1992
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Murmansk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Murmansk Regional Court
19/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
3,500
20257/19
01/04/2019
Vasiliy Mikhaylovich PAVLOV
1994
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Belgorod
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community work of 40 hours
Belgorod Regional Court
29/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20292/19
01/04/2019
Natalya Vyacheslavovna NIKIFOROVA
1970
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
12/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20317/19
02/04/2019
Mariya Nikolayevna KAYGORODOVA
1995
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
St Petersburg City Court
29/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 5.15 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to a police station at midnight on 10/09/2018 and released at 8 a.m. that day (according to the Government) or after 5 p.m. (according to the applicant);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
20439/19
02/04/2019
Pavel Borisovich TUDVASEV
1964
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Perm
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
community work of 20 hours
Perm Regional Court
16/01/2019
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
3,500
20606/19
01/04/2019
Yuliya Aleksandrovna ZAYTSEVA
1969
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 3.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 5 p.m. and released at 8.20 a.m. on 10/09/2018 (according to the Government);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
20615/19
01/04/2019
Kirill Pavlovich FABRITSIYEV
1988
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Volgograd
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
25/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
20621/19
01/04/2019
Albert Eduardovich MKHITARYAN
1995
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Tyumen
Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 18,000
Tyumen Regional Court
24/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO.
4,000
20626/19
01/04/2019
Aleksey Aleksandrovich KUPRIYANOV
1991
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention of 7 days
St Petersburg City Court
08/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested at 6.05 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to police station at 8.50 p.m. and released at 9.50 a.m. on 11/09/2018 (according to the Government);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
5,000
20911/19
01/04/2019
Olga Viktorovna BALASHOVA
1970
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
St Petersburg
Article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
11/10/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty –detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the administrative offence report was compiled: arrested between 5.20 p.m. and 6.10 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 6.50 p.m. and released at 11.30 a.m. on 10/09/2018 (according to the Government);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO.
4,000
21103/19
02/04/2019
Ivan Vladimirovich ZHELEZKIN
1986
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
21/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
21108/19
02/04/2019
Andrey Anatolyevich PUZATKIN
1986
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
30/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4.15 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. and released at 12.10 a.m. on 10/09/2018 (according to the Government);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
21177/19
01/04/2019
Vladimir Aleksandrovich TRIFANOV
1959
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
19/02/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested and brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released after 12.30 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
22409/19
02/04/2019
Stepan Alekseyevich VASILYEV
1994
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
15/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m., released after 12.30 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
25483/19
30/04/2019
Galina Dmitriyevna GLAVURDICH
1967
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Magnitogorsk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Chelyabinsk Regional Court
01/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
26475/19
08/05/2019
Svyatoslav Sergeyevich ALEKSEYEV
1998
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
21/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
26946/19
08/05/2019
Dmitriy Alekseyevich SEMENKOV
1998
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Murmansk
Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 150,000
Murmansk Regional Court
06/12/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO.
5,000
27967/19
16/05/2019
Marina-Viktoriya Igorevna ARISTOVA
2000
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Murmansk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Murmansk Regional Court
05/12/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
3,500
29241/19
21/05/2019
Danyel Sergeyevich VEBER
1997
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
22/11/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 2.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 3.20 p.m., released after 12 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
29268/19
06/05/2019
Anna Aleksandrovna KULIKOVA
1977
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Murmansk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Murmansk Regional Court
21/11/2018
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
3,500
29929/19
24/05/2019
Aleksandr Anatolyevich KULAKOV
1983
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
18/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m., released at 9.49 p.m.;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
30043/19
25/05/2019
Timur Alfredovich VALIULLIN
2001
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Khabarovsk
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
26/12/2018
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
33304/19
10/06/2019
Vadim Yevgenyevich PEKHOV
1979
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Yekaterinburg
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Sverdlovsk Region Court
16/01/2019
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – arrest and escorting to the police station on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of compiling an administrative offence report; detention in excess of three hours: arrested at 4 p.m. on 09/09/2018, brought to the police station at 4.20 p.m., released after 1.15 a.m. on 10/09/2018;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.