FIFTH SECTION
CASE OF KOKSHIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 45057/21 and 32 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
27 June 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kokshin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
María Elósegui, President,
Kateřina Šimáčková,
Stephane Pisani, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 6 June 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (CAO).
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. In view of the above findings, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning alleged restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 27 June 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
45057/21
25/08/2021
Yuriy
Sergeyevich KOKSHIN
1995
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Staryy Oskol
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Belgorod Regional Court
15/03/2021
3,500
45058/21
02/09/2021
Yuliya
Igorevna SEMAKHINA
1984
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
46111/21
10/09/2021
Alena
Romanovna SHUVAYEVA
1998
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Kuznetsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 12,000
Penza Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
46818/21
10/09/2021
Aleksandr Vasilyevich KIBANOV
1990
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
46824/21
10/09/2021
Pavel
Grigoryevich ZAMYSHLYAYEV
1988
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings)
4,000
47101/21
15/09/2021
Andrey
Andreyevich LACHUGIN
1998
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
25/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
47458/21
15/09/2021
Sergey
Vasilyevich SOLOMONOV
1972
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Komsomolsk-on-Amur
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Khabarovsk Regional Court
23/03/2021
3,500
47718/21
15/09/2021
Olga
Borisovna
MULERIS
1994
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Kaliningrad
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
Kaliningrad Regional Court
23/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings)
4,000
48655/21
24/09/2021
Vyacheslav Leonidovich USTENKO
2000
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention non 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the domestic proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
6668/22
14/01/2022
Vladimir
Igorevich
PANOV
1997
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
15/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
6669/22
14/01/2022
Maksim Georgiyevich GEORGIYEV
2002
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
15/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
6672/22
18/01/2022
Pavel
Viktorovich
TOMAS
1992
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention 10 days
Moscow City Court
19/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 02/02/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
6679/22
18/01/2022
Danila
Dmitriyevich YEROFEYEV
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
20/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
6687/22
18/01/2022
Irina
Vladimirovna SIDOROVA
1975
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Pskov
21/04/2021
article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 3,000
Pskov Regional Court
19/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
6690/22
18/01/2022
Albina
Alekseyevna LEONOVA
2002
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Pskov
21/04/2021
article 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 3,000
Pskov Regional Court
19/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
6692/22
18/01/2022
Kseniya Aleksandrovna NASLEDNIKOVA
1987
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Shopino
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 5,000
Belgorod Regional Court
19/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
7178/22
31/01/2022
Aleksandr Mikhaylovich DERREK
1998
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Yaroslavl Regional Court
15/09/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
7503/22
31/01/2022
Anna
Andreyevna ZNAMENSKAYA
1992
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Perm
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 7,000
Perm Regional Court
26/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
7508/22
31/01/2022
Aleksandr Galizhonovich KHAYROV
1991
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Krasnodar
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
04/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7630/22
31/01/2022
Svetlana
Yuryevna PENDRIKOVA
1976
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Murom
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 11,000
Vladimir Regional Court
25/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
7646/22
31/01/2022
Darya
Yevgenyevna UTENKOVA
2002
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Bratsk
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Irkutsk Regional Court
12/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
7699/22
31/01/2022
Aleksandr Nikolayevich
GRAB
1984
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
03/08/2021
3,500
9092/22
10/02/2022
Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BOGDASHEVSKIY
1991
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
23/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
9116/22
10/02/2022
Aleksandra Vadimovna KAMKINA
1999
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Yaroslavl Regional Court
25/08/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 21/04/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
11939/22
23/02/2022
Amir
Tagirovich KUTYYEV
1999
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 4,000
Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg
09/09/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
11946/22
23/02/2022
Aleksey
Alekseyevich
DYKIN
1985
Zhdanov
Ivan
Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
Lipetsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
07/10/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 23/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
17296/22
20/03/2022
Andrey Vladimirovich OSECHKIN
1977
Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/02/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
17298/22
20/03/2022
Nikita
Yuryevich YELPANOV
1997
Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/02/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
17301/22
20/03/2022
Mariya
Viktorovna
SOKOL
2000
Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/02/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
17305/22
20/03/2022
Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZAYTSEV
1991
Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/02/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity) (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
17308/22
20/03/2022
Ilya
Aleksandrovich SKVORTSOV
1999
Gerasimov Dmitriy Georgiyevich
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of
A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 20,000
St Petersburg City Court
01/02/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention on 31/01/2021 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
53830/22
21/10/2022
Dmitriy Vladimirovich DANILTSEV
1986
Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
24/02/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
21/06/2022
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
3,500
53833/22
27/10/2022
Kseniya Aleksandrovna KASHTANKINA
1981
Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Ulyanovsk
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative fine RUB 10,000
Ulyanovsk Regional Court
30/06/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - Arrest and detention from 3 p.m. to 8 p.m. on 06/03/2022 - Applicant taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;
Detention as an administrative suspect: beyond the three-hour statutory period (Art. 27.5(1)-(4) CAO) (raised in the administrative proceedings),
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.