Resolution ResDH(2001)177
concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
of 22 May 2001
in the case of Kisa and others against Turkey
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 17 December 2001
at the 775th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kisa and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;
Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 39328/98) against Turkey, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 5 December 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr Mevlüt Kisa, Mr Metin et Mr Oral Özkural, Ms Seher and Ms Emine Çoker, Mr Bilal Koçak and Mr Ihsan Sener, seven Turkish nationals, and that the Court, seized of the case under Article 5, paragraph 2, of Protocol No. 11, declared admissible the complaint relating to breaches of the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions due to the administration’s delays in paying additional compensation awarded for expropriation of the applicants’ property and to the substantial difference between the default interest rate applicable at the time (30%) and the average rate of inflation in Turkey;
Whereas in its judgment of 22 May 2001 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicants, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties’ undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;
Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Turkey would pay the applicants the sum of 42 900 American dollars, all damages included, upon notification of the judgment;
Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking-out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance or solution of the matter;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that on 9 August 2001, within the time-limit agreed to under the terms of the friendly settlement, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicants the sum provided in the friendly and that no other measure was required in the present case to conform to the Court’s judgment,
Declares, after having taken note of the information supplied by the Government of Turkey, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy