THIRD SECTION
CASE OF KUZNETSOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 33552/21 and 36 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
25 April 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kuznetsova and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President,
Ioannis Ktistakis,
Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 114‑42, 9 April 2019, as regards the conditions of transport of detainees; and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative‑offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1]
33552/21
09/06/2021
Natalya Sergeyevna KUZNETSOVA
1995
Shagiyeva Regina Ilgizovna
Leninigorsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Naberezhnye Chelny
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.55 p.m. on 01/02/2021.
4,000
34362/21
03/06/2021
Ivan Yevgenyevich TIMESHKOV
2002
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Cheboksary
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
05/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
34364/21
03/06/2021
Aleksandr Andreyevich ALEKSEYEV
1999
Glukhov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Novocheboksarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Cheboksary
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
the Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
40680/21
25/07/2021
Yelena Igorevna KONDRAKHINA
1987
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Rally to support convicted activists from a group known as Set (Network)
St Petersburg
22/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from around 1 p.m. until 7.25 p.m. on 22/06/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
40942/21
23/07/2021
Andrey Vladimirovich NOVIKOV
1996
Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2 a.m. on 03/02/2021 until 3 p.m. on 04/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41050/21
30/07/2021
Olga Aleksandrovna POPOVA
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 8 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transfer in a police van on 31/01/2021: the applicant was transferred with 18 other demonstrators in a police van equipped to accommodate 8 persons, without ventilation;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
6,000
41119/21
24/07/2021
Aleksandr Nikolayevich LYSENKO
1975
Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna
Balashikha
Forum "Municipal Russia"
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021.
4,000
41123/21
24/07/2021
Roman Aleksandrovich YUDAKOV
1983
Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna
Balashikha
Forum "Municipal Russia"
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 4.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021.
4,000
41126/21
24/07/2021
Vasiliy Viktorovich BALASHOV
1992
Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna
Balashikha
Forum "Municipal Russia"
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow
24/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 6.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021.
4,000
41128/21
24/07/2021
Irina Sergeyevna ILDERYAKOVA
1995
Tregubova Yuliya Mikhaylovna
Balashikha
Forum "Municipal Russia"
Moscow
13/03/2021
article 20.33 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Izmaylovskiy District Court of Moscow
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 10.30 a.m. until 2.30 p.m. on 13/03/2021.
4,000
41178/21
05/08/2021
Ilya Alekseyevich KORGUN
1991
Sidorkina Svetlana Ivanovna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
Moscow City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
41648/21
06/08/2021
Anna Vladimirovna BYKOVA
1975
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2
§ 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
10/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 12 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54530/21
11/10/2021
Vladislav Olegovich KULAMOV
1986
Sharafutdinov Eldar Ramilyevich
Orenburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Orenburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Orenburg Regional Court
14/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54543/21
14/10/2021
Viktor Sergeyevich MINYASHEV
1989
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Samara
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
15/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021.
4,000
54832/21
27/10/2021
Aleksandr Semenovich BIBIKOV
1995
Nazarov Ilya Yulyevich
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
Moscow City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 4 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
54939/21
28/10/2021
Vasiliy Viktorovich OLEYNIKOV
1987
Balog Natalya Andreyevna
Krasnoyarsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Krasnoyarsk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.15 p.m. until 8.50 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
55061/21
25/10/2021
Georgiy Konstantinovich CHUVILO
1998
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kaluga
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 16,000
Kaluga Regional Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.56 p.m. on 02/02/2021.
4,000
56119/21
16/11/2021
Timur Zinatulloyevich RAKHMATULIN
1981
Valiyeva Elza Albertovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Orenburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Orenburg Regional Court
18/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
56131/21
25/10/2021
Yegor Sergeyevich MYAKINNIKOV
1996
Tseytlina Olga Pavlovna
St Petersburg
Rally to support Belarusians participating in mass protests
St Petersburg
24/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
detention for 2 days
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12 p.m. on 23/03/2021 until 3 p.m. on 25/03/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
56573/21
26/10/2021
Alena Andreyevna DYRTSEVA
1999
Rusnakov Pavel Vladimirovich
Tyumen
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Tyumen
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
detention for 15 days
Tyumen Regional Court
30/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.05 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 2 p.m. on 23/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
56681/21
28/10/2021
Yuriy Sergeyevich SERGEYCHIK
1976
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
21/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.02 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
56927/21
28/10/2021
Sergey Vladimirovich RYABTSEV
1973
Yakupova Anna Vladimirovna
Izhevsk
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Izhevsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Udmurtia Republic
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
57308/21
19/11/2021
Andrey Gennadyevich ARTYUSHIN
1982
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Irkutsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Irkutsk Regional Court
17/08/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
57392/21
26/10/2021
Emir Isabekovich ISABEKOV
2000
Anosova Lidiya Sergeyevna
Orekhovo-Zuyevo
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2 p.m. until 11 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
57407/21
16/11/2021
Georgiy Georgiyevich LUTSKEVICH
1975
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Voronezh Regional Court
04/06/2021
3,500
58326/21
19/11/2021
Maksim Romanovich ZARKOV
2001
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
19/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
58521/21
25/10/2021
Aleksandr Andreyevich KUZMENKO
1995
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
58639/21
12/11/2021
Yevgeniy Viktorovich KOBAK
1986
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Kazan
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
12/05/2021
3,500
58761/21
17/11/2021
Zakir Alikerimovich ABDULKERIMOV
1994
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
59073/21
22/11/2021
Ilya Mikhaylovich PONOMAREV
1994
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Voronezh
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Voronezh Regional Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1.55 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.05 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
59270/21
15/11/2021
Alina Rustemovna BAYKEY
1993
Bayeva Aleksandra Nikolayevna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention for 3 days
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 2 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
59441/21
20/11/2021
Nikolay Aleksandrovich MOSKVICHEV
1995
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60092/21
21/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich YEFIMOV
1998
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
21/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. until 8.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60179/21
24/10/2021
Yakov Valeryevich BARVASHOV
1970
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
01/07/2021
3,500
60620/21
08/12/2021
Yegor Yuryevich LITVINOV
1999
Yermolayeva Nadezhda Viktorovna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
09/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.10 a.m. until 8 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60640/21
27/11/2021
Mikhail Makarovich MUKHOYAN
1964
Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Korolev
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow Regional Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
60650/21
20/11/2021
David Igorevich BOGATYREV
2002
Savin Aleksandr Vasilyevich
Stavropol
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
Stavropol
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Stavropol Regional Court
22/09/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report on 21/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.