Resolution CM/ResDH(2023)284
Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
Lyparis against Greece
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 October 2023
at the 1478th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
6047/14
LYPARIS
10/11/2022
10/11/2022
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,
Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation established on account of a violation of the applicant’s freedom of expression due to the civil court’s decision ordering him to pay damages for having defamed the plaintiff, through an article published in the press (violation of Article 10);
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgment including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)1005);
Considering that no further individual measures appear possible since it is not possible, under Greek law, to have a civil case re-examined or re-opened following the judgment of the European Court; recalling nonetheless that the pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant was redressed by the just satisfaction awarded by the Court covering the damages he had paid been ordered to pay;
Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in this judgment continues to be examined within the framework of the Vasilakis case also in the light of the Court’s findings in this case, and that the closure of this case therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to preventing similar violations of freedom of expression;
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case;
CONCLUDES that the necessary individual measures have been adopted;
DECIDES to continue to supervise the adoption of the necessary general measures in the case Vasilakis;
DECIDES to close the examination of this case.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy