THIRD SECTION
CASE OF MALYKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 42001/21 and 32 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 October 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Malykhina and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Kovatcheva, President,
Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 25 September 2025,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained about the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID‑19‑related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, no. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to the assemblies is concerned.
9. In the leading cases of Nemytov and Others (cited above, §§ 136-51) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 October 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal offence
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
42001/21
05/08/2021
Regina Yakovlevna MALYKHINA
2000
Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
02/02/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg
City Court
09/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
42042/21
14/08/2021
Diana Aleksandrovna CHURDALEVA
1996
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally " Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
42174/21
05/08/2021
Nikita Sergeyevich US
1998
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 11 days
St Petersburg
City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.10 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
42339/21
08/08/2021
Viktoriya Viktorovna ZHUCHENKO
1994
Belozerov Aleksey Sergeyevich
St PEtersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
09/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
42378/21
18/08/2021
Mikhail Mikhaylovich PUSHKAREV
1991
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
42539/21
10/08/2021
Sergey Viktorovich GALAYBO
1971
Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 7 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
5,000
46212/21
02/09/2021
Vitaliy Konstantinovich FILATOV
1988
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
02/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
46232/21
01/09/2021
Olga Vasilyevna BAKHAREVA
1989
Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
16/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
51393/21
30/09/2021
Aleksey Aleksandrovich GUSHCHIN
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
St Petersburg City Court
08/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
52705/21
22/10/2021
Nil Vadimovich PETSKO
1989
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021 (released after the court hearing);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
52741/21
15/10/2021
Mikhail Viktorovich SHEVCHENKO
1984
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
29/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 7.15 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
53502/21
13/10/2021
Georgiy Alekseyevich MEDVINSKIY
1987
Mikhaylova Kseniya Andreyevna
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
53801/21
26/10/2021
Ruslan Ildarovich GALIYEV
1998
Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
54429/21
27/10/2021
Aleksandr Anatolyevich BASHKIROV
1984
Bayeva Aleksandra Nikolayevna
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
St Petersburg City Court
20/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.44 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 9 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
55653/21
22/10/2021
Rafael Radikovich ABDRAFIKOV
2002
MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.20 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
55851/21
05/11/2021
Kirill Andreyevich BOGATYRENKO
1992
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 8-6-1 § 2 of the Law of St Petersburg on Administrative Offences in St Petersburg
fine RUB 4,000
Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg
18/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
56493/21
27/10/2021
Alisa Olegovna DELOVA
1994
MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
56815/21
22/10/2021
Vladislav Sergeyevich ZIMIREV
1996
Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
02/02/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 6 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
56842/21
22/10/2021
Georgiy Konstantinovich SIZYKH
1996
Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich
St Petersburg
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
02/02/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
56896/21
10/11/2021
Anastasiya Igorevna BESKHMELNAYA
1993
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
24/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.58 p.m. until 10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
57144/21
29/10/2021
Anton Vladimirovich VITSKIY
1990
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 12 days
St Petersburg City Court
29/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 7.45 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
6,000
57711/21
26/10/2021
Svetlana Gennadyevna BEZUGLOVA
1989
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 12 days
St Petersburg City Court
27/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.20 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 2 a.m. on 22/04/2022;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
6,000
57861/21
11/11/2021
Dmitriy Sergeyevich PAPORT
1985
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
59389/21
25/11/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZAKAMALDIN
1979
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
17/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
59447/21
25/11/2021
Yelena Yuryevna PLAKSINA
1970
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
10/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
59451/21
25/11/2021
Rustam Kayratovich SULEYMENOV
1995
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
15/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
60029/21
03/12/2021
Maksim Aleksandrovich ZEMSKIY
1993
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 8-6-1 § 2 of St Petersburg Decree No 273-70
fine of RUB 4,000
Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg
06/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61110/21
06/12/2021
Dmitriy Mikhaylovich ZOBNIN
2002
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
08/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. until 11.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
61320/21
27/11/2021
Daroslav Aleksandrovich SKIBA
2003
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.20 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
2046/22
22/12/2021
Anna Igorevna MICHURINA
1986
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Medical care to Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
15/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until noon on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
3824/22
22/12/2021
Sergey Aleksandrovich BULTYKOV
1984
Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich
St Petersburg
Rally "Free Navalnyy’
St Petersburg
21/04/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
detention for 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
22/06/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
6351/22
11/01/2022
Aleksandra Sergeyevna ABDUGAPAROVA
1990
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
St Petersburg City Court
13/07/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
4,000
7345/22
20/01/2022
Dmitriy Vitalyevich GLOBOV
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2
§ 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
St Petersburg City Court
20/07/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
3,500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.