Resolution CM/ResDH(2014)172
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Twelve cases against Poland
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
38184/03
MATYJEK
24/04/2007
24/09/2007
68761/01
BOBEK
17/07/2007
10/12/2007
34030/07
JAŁOWIECKI
17/02/2009
17/05/2009
37469/05
LUBOCH
15/01/2008
15/04/2008
38886/05
RASMUSSEN
28/04/2009
28/07/2009
37293/09
ZAWISZA
31/05/2011
31/08/2011
49974/08
MOCZULSKI
19/04/2011
19/07/2011
10104/08
ZABŁOCKI
31/05/2011
31/08/2011
52443/07
MOŚCICKI
14/06/2011
14/09/2011
50399/07
GÓRNY
08/06/2010
08/09/2010
24254/05
TOMASZ KWIATKOWSKI
19/04/2011
19/07/2011
23119/05
WRONA
05/01/2010
05/04/2010
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 September 2014
at the 1208th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2014)1057);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy