FIRST SECTION
CASE OF PAPULIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 40133/21 and 43 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
11 April 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Papulin and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lətif Hüseynov, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Erik Wennerström, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 21 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
LOCUS STANDI in application no. 41953/217. Following the death of the applicant, Ms Bondarenko (application no. 41953/21), her daughter, Ms Elena Vladimirovna Pikalova, expressed her wish to pursue the application on behalf of the deceased applicant (see the appended table).
8. The Court reiterates that where an applicant dies during the examination of a case, his or her heirs or close relatives may in principle pursue the application on his or her behalf (see Ječius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 41, ECHR 2000-IX, and concerning, more specifically, complaints under Article 11 of the Convention, Savenko and Others v. Russia, no. 13918/06, § 52, 14 September 2021, and references cited therein). In the present case, the applicant’s daughter submitted documents confirming that she was the applicant’s heir. In these circumstances, the Court considers that Ms Pikalova has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application in place of her late mother.
9. In the light of the above, the Court accepts that Ms Pikalova has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application in place of her deceased mother. It will therefore continue to deal with the case at her request. For convenience, however, it will continue to refer to Ms Bondarenko as the applicant in the present judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION10. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
11. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
12. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
13. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
14. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW15. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
16. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocol in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS17. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION18. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Holds that Ms Pikalova, the daughter of the applicant, Ms Bondarenko, in application no. 41953/21, has a legitimate interest in pursuing the application in place of her late mother;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocol thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 April 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros)[1]
40133/21
28/07/2021
Aleksey Mikhaylovich PAPULIN
1992
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 4 days
Moscow City Court
03/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.45 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing of his case on 01/02/2021, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
40135/21
28/07/2021
Dmitriy Vladimirovich GORBACHEV
1988
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 5 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, held in detention after drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative detention – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000
40158/21
27/07/2021
Roman Andreyevich BORDUNOV
1993
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 13 days
Moscow City Court
09/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/02/2021
5,000
40194/21
27/07/2021
Oleg Vladimirovich LITVISHKO
1984
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2021
5,000
40197/21
27/07/2021
Anna Alekseyevna GRIGORYEVA
2000
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 5 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.45 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and for bringing the applicant to the court hearing of her case on 03/02/2021, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
40322/21
27/07/2021
Dmitriy Alekseyevich LOMP
1990
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 14 days
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and for bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021
5,000
40464/21
27/07/2021
Yaroslav Ivanovich IVANOV
1982
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.25 p.m. to unspecified time on 31/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2021
4,000
40511/21
30/07/2021
Alena Vladimirovna KUZINA
1999
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 4 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 9 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 3.30 p.m. on 03/02/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and for bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 03/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
41202/21
02/08/2021
Maksim Yuryevich IZHEDEROV
1996
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 4.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, held in detention after drawing up an administrative offence record and until the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/02/2021
5,000
41233/21
06/08/2021
Ivan Mikhaylovich SHCHAPOV
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 7 days
Moscow City Court
08/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 08/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
41245/21
25/07/2021
Tatyana Ivanovna KOVRIZHNYKH
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Tsvetkova
Moscow
27/06/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
26/01/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 4.38 p.m. to 11.19 p.m. on 27/06/2020 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/01/2021
4,000
41495/21
23/07/2021
Yevgeniya Andreyevna FROLOVA
1987
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
03/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for drawing up a record of administrative offence and for bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 03/02/2021
5,000
41680/21
09/08/2021
Fedor Ivanovich MALYSHEV
1996
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
09/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest from 2.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and for bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 09/02/2021
5,000
41953/21
30/07/2021
Valentina Yuryevna BONDARENKO
Born in 1958
Deceased in 2022
Heir:
Pikalova Elena
Vladimirovna
1987
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Pyatigorsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
administrative detention of 1 day
Stavropol Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.30 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, held in detention after drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Stavropol Regional Court, 31/03/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative arrest – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000,
to be paid to the applicant’s heir, Ms Elena Vladimirovna Pikalova
42464/21
05/08/2021
Nikolay Yuryevich KABALIN
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 5 days
Moscow City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3.14 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 7.35 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot; held in detention after drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 11/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative arrest – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000
42467/21
05/08/2021
Dmitriy Olegovich PETELIN
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 11 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, held in detention after drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative detention – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000
42982/21
16/08/2021
Oleg Igorevich KRYZHANOVSKIY
1989
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Lipetsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Lipetsk Regional Court
25/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest at 12.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Lipetsk Regional Court, 25/02/2021
4,000
43275/21
09/08/2021
Dmitriy Mikhaylovich KOZLOV
1992
Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
11/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to the day of court hearing on 24/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 11/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - The applicant started serving his sentence – administrative detention – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000
43854/21
10/08/2021
Fedor Igorevich KIRILLOV
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
Manifestation against the war in Ukraine
Moscow
06/03/2022
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Moscow City Court
17/10/2022
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 11.20 a.m. on 03/02/2021 and from 4.25 p.m. to 10.31 p.m. on 06/03/2022 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not be done on spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative detention – before the appeal judgment was delivered, proceedings ended on 10/02/2021 in the Moscow City Court
5,000
45034/21
03/09/2021
Vladimir Valentinovich FILIPPENKO
1981
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Magnitogorsk
31/01/2021
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 1,000
Chelyabinsk Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.05 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Altay Regional Court, 18/03/2021
4,000
45065/21
01/09/2021
Sergey Mikhaylovich KOBELEV
1979
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Barnaul
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Altay Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not be done on spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Altay Regional Court, 18/03/2021
4,000
45703/21
19/08/2021
Raira Georgiyevna BAZMANI
2002
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
23/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.30 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, no evidence that it could not be done on spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 23/06/2021
4,000
46693/21
03/09/2021
Viktor Yevgenyevich LEVAKOV
1966
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
20/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 6.15 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 0.50 a.m. on 24/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021
4,000
46997/21
15/09/2021
Yegor Yevgenyevich BYCHENKOV
2002
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Vladimir
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
23/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 2.50 p.m. on 25/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Vladimir Regional Court, 23/03/2021
4,000
47516/21
15/09/2021
Stanislav Andreyevich BUGAYEV
1994
Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich
Velikiy Novgorod
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.19 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 18/03/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
47649/21
15/09/2021
Elvira Nikolayevna KUDRYASHOVA
1964
Protasov Vladimir Yuryevich
Yoshkar - Ola
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Yoshkar-Ola
23/01/2021
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Yoshkar-Ola
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 5,000
fine of RUB 500
Supreme Court of the Mariy El Republic
17/03/2021
Supreme Court of the Mariy El Republic
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2021 until the court hearing for the purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal
4,000
48188/21
28/09/2021
Yefrosinya Sergeyevna KHARCHENKO
1998
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.50 p.m. on 02/02/2021 till 3.59 a.m. on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 02/04/2021
4,000
49382/21
22/09/2021
Mikhail Ruslanovich SOLODOVNIKOV
2002
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Novorossiysk
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
22/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 22/03/2021
3,500
49711/21
17/09/2021
Nadezhda Viktorovna LYYUROVA
1967
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.00 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021
4,000
49918/21
21/09/2021
Yelena Vyacheslavovna TSOVINA
1964
Vasilyev Nikolay Vladimirovich
Moscow
Demonstration against the destruction of a park
Moscow
27/09/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021
3,500
50123/21
23/09/2021
Konstantin Mikhaylovich VOROVICH
1991
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/05/2021
4,000
50154/21
23/09/2021
Yekaterina Vladimirovna ZUBKOVA
1969
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Ukhta
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi
31/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrested at about 1 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and held at a police station for more than 4 hours, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 31/03/2021
4,000
50163/21
23/09/2021
Stepan Glebovich PYANYKH
1994
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
27/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 27/05/2021
4,000
50219/21
24/09/2021
Alina Aleksandrovna KOLESOVA
1998
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Pyatigorsk
31/01/2021
article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 24/03/2021
3,500
50225/21
23/09/2021
Sergey Aleksandrovich KALINKIN
1987
Zinovyev Konstantin Mikhaylovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 12,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021
3,500
50546/21
24/09/2021
Aleksey Leonidovich SIVAKS
1983
Seleznev Stanislav Aleksandrovich
Samara
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Samara
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Samara Regional Court
22/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.05 p.m. to 4.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Samara Regional Court, 22/04/2021
4,000
50609/21
29/09/2021
Vladimir Andreyevich IVANOV
1984
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Anapa
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to 8.10 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021
4,000
51115/21
01/10/2021
Yelena Vladimirovna ORLOVA
2000
Sirosh Fedor Yevgenyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 13,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 02/04/2021
4,000
51119/21
01/10/2021
Dmitriy Iosifovich KUZICHEV
1984
Sirosh Fedor Yevgenyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
02/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 7 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 02/04/2021
4,000
51295/21
29/09/2021
Erik Eduardovich RAY
1999
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
03/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
08/02/2021
(received on 30/03/2021)
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 0.15 p.m. to 4.00 p.m. on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 08/02/2021 (received on 30/03/2021),
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the applicant started serving his sentence – administrative detention – before the appeal judgment was delivered
5,000
51676/21
24/09/2021
Yekaterina Vladimirovna OKONOVENKO
1996
Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna
Vladivostok
Manifestation in support of Furgal
Vladivostok
18/07/2020
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Primorye Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 29/03/2021
3,500
51761/21
15/10/2021
Maksim Pavlovich RODIONOV
1980
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Vladimir
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Vladimir Regional Court
27/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Vladimir Regional Court, 27/04/2021
3,500
51776/21
15/10/2021
Kirill Viktorovich KUZNETSOV
1997
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
28/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 until the court hearing for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, no evidence that it could not have been done on the spot, raised on appeal
4,000
52037/21
13/10/2021
Aleksey Valeyevich AYSIN
1991
Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
15/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 15/04/2021
3,500
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.