THIRD SECTION
CASE OF PROGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 39222/21 and 25 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
21 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Progunov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President,
Ioannis Ktistakis,
Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. The applicants, except for Ms Kuzmina, application no. 49671/21, also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention and its Protocol.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. The applicants, except for Ms Kuzina, application no. 49671/21, submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocol in the light of its findings in Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 114-42, 9 April 2019, as regards the condition of transport of detainees; Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention;Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocol thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative / criminal charges
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under
well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant
(in euros)[1]
39222/21
28/07/2021
Andrey Dmitriyevich PROGUNOV
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 10 p.m. on 01/02/2021, for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate enforcement of the administrative arrest ordered by the first-instance court
5,000
40195/21
27/07/2021
Dmitriy Ivanovich GUZOV
2000
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 in excess of 3 hours for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative
offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant on 01/02/2021 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
5,000
40415/21
24/07/2021
Aleksandr Sergeyevich SAVINOV
1989
Shimovolos Sergey Mikhaylovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
10/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.15 p.m. to 6 p.m. on 31/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 10/06/2021
4,000
40845/21
02/08/2021
Vadim Nabilevich MAKOVEYEV
1992
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 7 days
Moscow City Court
04/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 12.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/02/2021
5,000
41251/21
27/07/2021
Sergey Vasilyevich LOGINOV
1981
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 12 days
Moscow City Court
12/02/2021
Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - 31/01-02/02/2021, van, overcrowding, no access to potable water, no access to food, 23 persons spent a night in van, no sleeping places,
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/02/2021
5,000
41304/21
31/07/2021
Yelena Mikhaylovna VOTCHITSEVA
1991
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 8 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention took place from 2 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.50 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: 05/02/2021, Moscow City Court
5,000
41468/21
31/07/2021
Mark Yevgenyevich VDOVICHENKO
1996
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
detention of 12 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from about 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 12.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021
5,000
42479/21
05/08/2021
Vladislav Andreyevich YUNDIN
1998
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 13 days
Moscow City Court
05/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6.40 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 05/02/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - immediate enforcement of the administrative arrest ordered by the first-instance court
5,000
42567/21
09/08/2021
Nika Andreyevna VEDRNIKOVA
1989
Tkachenko Ilya Valeryevich
Gatchina
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 10 days
St Petersburg City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 11.55 a.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 10/02/2021
5,000
43240/21
09/08/2021
Roman Igorevich BATUSOV
1995
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.30 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021
5,000
45838/21
02/09/2021
Dmitriy Yevgenyevich PLAKSIN
1989
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record and bringing the applicant to the court, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 17/03/2021
4,000
45996/21
08/09/2021
Samat Serkbayevich MURZAGALIYEV
2000
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Saratov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Saratov Regional Court
23/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5.40 p.m. to 8.40 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Saratov Regional Court, 23/03/2021
4,000
46419/21
03/09/2021
Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich LITVINOV
1998
Karagodina Veronika Yuryevna
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 5 days
St Petersburg City Court
09/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 4 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 6.20 p.m. on 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: St Petersburg City Court, 09/03/2021
5,000
46712/21
11/09/2021
Polina Sergeyevna KUSKOVA
2000
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Kirov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Kirov Regional Court
11/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Kirov Regional Court, 11/03/2021
3,500
46780/21
12/08/2021
Grigoriy Vyacheslavovich SEMKIN
1990
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Vladimir
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of 10,000 RUB
Vladimir Regional Court
01/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Vladimir Regional Court, 01/03/2021
3,500
46846/21
14/09/2021
Arevik Grachikovna KHARAZYAN
1998
Eysmont Mariya Olegovna
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 11.30 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 1.37 p.m. on 03/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021
5,000
47044/21
04/09/2021
Viktoriya Viktorovna GUSHCHINA
1989
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Anapa
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 4.10 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 17/03/2021
4,000
47489/21
05/09/2021
Yasmina Sabitovna OMEROVICH
1998
Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of 20,000 RUB
Moscow City Court
12/04/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/04/2021
3,500
48045/21
20/09/2021
Yuriy Alekseyevich PROTSENKO
1961
Martynova Tatyana Georgiyevna
Pskov
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Pskov
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Pskov Regional Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. to unspecified time on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Pskov Regional Court, 22/03/2021
4,000
49509/21
01/10/2021
Anatoliy Sergeyevich MAVRENKOV
1995
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Murmansk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Murmansk Regional Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention after the demonstration for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal
4,000
49518/21
14/09/2021
Yevgeniy Vladimirovich TUMANIS
1982
Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna
St Petersburg
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Blagoveschensk
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, and 20.6.1 § 1 of CAO
fines of RUB 10,000 and 5,000
Amur Regional Court, 17/03/2021 and
25/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2.30 p.m. to about 7 p.m. on 23/01/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings – in the proceedings leading to the sentence of the administrative fine of RUB 10,000, on 25/03/2021, by the Amur Regional Court
4,000
49671/21
16/09/2021
Kseniya Aleksandrovna KUZMINA
1990
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Manifestation in support of
Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of 10,000 RUB
Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan
31/03/2021
3,500
49882/21
22/09/2021
Kseniya Anatolyevna GOLUBTSOVA
1990
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 5 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 7 p.m. on 25/01/2021 for the purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence and bringing the applicant to the court hearing, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021
4,000
50076/21
23/09/2021
Igor Olegovich GLADKIY
1998
Shindyapin Arkadiy Vitalyevich
Moscow
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
17/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 2 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 17/05/2021
4,000
51020/21
01/10/2021
Nikolay Aleksandrovich ZHIGALOV
1990
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
25/05/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 1.30 p.m. to unspecified time on 02/02/2021 for the sole purpose of drawing up an administrative offence record, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Moscow City Court, 25/05/2021
4,000
53165/21
23/09/2021
Aleksey Viktorovich PLOSKAREV
1975
Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich
Yekaterinburg
Manifestation in support of Navalnyy
Yekaterinburg
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
20 hours of community service
Sverdlovsk Regional Court
17/06/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - arrest and detention from 12.00 p.m. to 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/20201 for the sole purpose of drawing a record of administrative offence, raised on appeal,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - Final decision: Sverdlovsk Regional Court
17/06/2021
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.