Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)333
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Nine cases against the Russian Federation
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020
at the 1391st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
58973/00
RAKEVICH
28/10/2003
24/03/2004
26321/03
BIK
22/04/2010
04/10/2010
33117/02
LASHIN
22/01/2013
22/04/2013
5525/11
MIFOBOVA
05/02/2015
05/05/2015
28796/07
PETUKHOVA
02/05/2013
02/08/2013
44009/05
SHTUKATUROV
27/03/2008
04/03/2010
27/06/2008
04/06/2010
34449/03
SHULEPOVA
11/12/2008
11/03/2009
40979/04
TRUTKO
06/12/2016
06/03/2017
11737/06
ZAGIDULINA
02/05/2013
02/08/2013
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)1066);
Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the Rakevich case as regards the violation of Article 5, paragraph 4 (right to initiate judicial review of psychiatric confinement under the domestic law) continue to be examined within the framework of the Bataliny case and that the closure of the Rakevich case therefore does not in any way prejudge the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy