Resolution ResDH(2005)38
concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights
of 15 June 2004 (Friendly settlement)
in the case of Romlin against Sweden
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 25 April 2005
at the 922nd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol No. 11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”),
Having regard to the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Romlin case delivered on 15 June 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;
Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 48630/99) against Sweden, lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 19 April 1999 under Article 34 of the Convention by MsTinna Romlin, a Swedish national, and that the Court declared admissible the complaint relating to the applicant's right to a hearing;
Whereas in its judgment of 15 June 2004 the Court, after having taken formal note of a friendly settlement reached by the government of the respondent state and the applicant, and having been satisfied that the settlement was based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided unanimously to strike the case out of its list and took note of the parties' undertaking not to request a re-hearing of the case before the Grand Chamber;
Whereas under the above-mentioned friendly settlement it was agreed that the Government of Sweden would pay the applicant's lawyer, the sum of 9 518 euros upon notification of the judgment;
Recalling that Rule 43, paragraph 3, of the Rules of the Court (former Article 44, paragraph 2) provides that the striking out of a case which has been declared admissible shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward to the Committee of Ministers once it has become final in order to allow it to supervise, in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the execution of any undertakings which may have been attached to the discontinuance, friendly settlement or solution of the matter;
Having regard to the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;
Having satisfied itself that on 29 June 2004, the government of the respondent state had paid the applicant's lawyer the sum provided for in the friendly settlement and that no other measure was required in the present case to conform to the Court's judgment,
Declares, after having examined the information supplied by the government of Sweden, that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy