Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)193
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Three cases against Lithuania
Application No.
Case
Judgment of
Final on
55480/00+
SIDABRAS AND DŽIAUTAS
27/07/2004
27/10/2004
70665/01
RAINYS AND GASPARAVIČIUS
07/04/2005
07/07/2005
50421/08+
SIDABRAS AND OTHERS
23/06/2014
23/09/2014
(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 6 September 2016
at the 1263rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),
Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;
Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:
- of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and
- of general measures preventing similar violations;
Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;
Having noted that the judgments concerned the applicants’ discrimination in the enjoyment of their right to respect for private life due to the imposition of disproportionate employment restrictions in certain branches of the private sector which was in force between 1999 and 2009 (violations of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 8);
Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)409);
Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,
DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and
DECIDES to close the examination thereof.
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy