SECOND SECTION
CASE OF ŞENYÜREK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
(Applications nos. 34986/05, 34987/05, 35070/05, 41921/06, 44922/06, 44959/06, 44979/06, 44983/06, 45016/06, 45069/06, 45096/06, 45100/06, 45115/06, 45127/06, 50158/06, 50159/06, 10878/07 and 24160/08)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
21 September 2010
FINAL
21/12/2010
This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Şenyürek and Others v. Turkey,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:
Françoise Tulkens, President,
Ireneu Cabral Barreto,
Dragoljub Popović,
Nona Tsotsoria,
Işıl Karakaş,
Kristina Pardalos,
Guido Raimondi, judges,
and Françoise Elens-Passos, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 31 August 2010,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications nos. 34986/05, 34987/05, 35070/05, 41921/06, 44922/06, 44959/06, 44979/06, 44983/06, 45016/06, 45069/06, 45096/06, 45100/06, 45115/06, 45127/06, 50158/06, 50159/06, 10878/07 and 24160/08 against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and fifty four Turkish nationals (“the applicants”) on the dates indicated in the annex hereto. Certain applicants are party to more than one application.
2. The applicants were represented by Mr S. Kaya, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
3. On 27 May 2009 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the applications to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the applications at the same time (Article 29 § 3).
THE FACTS
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
4. All of the applicants are from the Çayçatı village of Muş. Numerous plots of land in the village had been used by the applicants' parents or grandparents without a title deed since the 1930's. These parcels were registered in the name of the Treasury in 1960 pursuant to Law no. 4753. In 1977 they were re-registered in the name of the Treasury pursuant to the Land Registry Act (Law no. 766).
5. On various dates in 1989, the applicants instituted numerous civil proceedings in the Varto Civil Court of First Instance pursuant to Law no. 3402 and requested the annulment of the titles to the plots. Claiming that the parcels in question had been in their families' possession for many years, the applicants further requested that the land be registered in their name. They were all represented by the same lawyer. The first-instance court examined the claims under various files and delivered its initial judgments on different dates between 1989 and 1991 in the presence of the representatives of both parties, which were then either upheld or quashed by the Court of Cassation on various dates between 2003 and 2005. For those judgments that had been quashed, the domestic court continued the proceedings by holding numerous on-site visits, hearing witnesses and requesting expert reports, whilst collecting information. The proceedings ended in the applicants' favour on various dates between 2005 and 2007, after being examined at two levels of jurisdiction, which delivered up to six judgments. The final decisions for files nos. 2005/152, 2005/72, 2005/55, 2005/54 and 2005/49 were served on the applicants on 18 July 2006.
6. Further details concerning the present applications, including the dates of the domestic judgments and notifications, may be found in the attached list.
THE LAW
I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
7. The Court considers that, given their common factual and legal background and pursuant to Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined.
II. SCOPE
8. The Court takes note that, in their replies to the Government's observations following the communication of the applications, Mehmet Ataç and Mehmet Azak (application no. 50158/06 and applications nos. 44922/06 and 10878/07 respectively) informed the Court that they did not wish to pursue their applications. The Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols does not require the examination of the applications in respect of these two applicants to be continued (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
9. In view of the above, the Court holds that it is appropriate to strike the applications out of the list of cases in respect of Mehmet Ataç and Mehmet Azak. The Court will therefore confine its examination of the case to the remaining applicants.
II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION
10. The applicants complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the “reasonable-time” requirement laid down in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal...”
A. Admissibility
11. The Government pointed out that Turkey had accepted the competence of the Court to examine individual petitions only in respect of facts or events which have occurred since 22 January 1990. On that account, they contended that the Court can consider only the period after 22 January 1990. The Government further asked the Court to reject the case of Ahmet Koçhan and 45 Others v. Turkey (33694/05) for non-compliance with the six-month time-limit set out in Article 35 § 1 of the Convention. In their view, the final judgment in the aforementioned case in respect of parcels nos. 38, 32, 19, 39 and 21 had been served on the applicants on 18 July 2006, whereas their application was introduced before the Court on 13 February 2007.
12. The applicants contested these arguments. They maintained that the judgments in respect of parcels nos. 19, 21, 32, 38 and 39 had become final on 21 August and 11 September 2006 and 13 February 2007.
13. Concerning the Government's first objection, the Court reiterates that it has already held that its competence ratione temporis began on 28 January 1987, the date on which Turkey's declaration accepting the right of individual petition came into force (see Cankoçak v. Turkey, nos. 25182/94 and 2956/95, § 26, 20 February 2001). Noting that the proceedings in the present applications were initiated on various dates in 1989, the Court considers that the Government's jurisdictional objection cannot be upheld.
14. As for the Government's second objection, the Court reiterates that where an applicant is entitled to be served ex officio with a written copy of the final domestic decision, the object and purpose of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention are best served by counting the six-month period as running from the date of service of the written judgment (see Worm v. Austria, 29 August 1997, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-V). In line with the above, the Court regularly takes as the starting point for the running of the six-month period in cases against Turkey, the date of service of the decisions of the Court of Cassation's Civil Division on the applicants (see Serdar Tamer Kaygan and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41317/05, 20 October 2009; and Türkan Aras v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29643/05, ECHR 2 March 2010).
15. Turning to the present applications, the Court observes that the majority of the parcels were claimed by several applicants at the same time, who introduced numerous and more or less simultaneous proceedings before the Varto Civil Court of First Instance for the same group of parcels. Therefore, the domestic court examined claims for a given parcel under various files and delivered its judgments at different dates.
16. Against this background the Court notes that the applicants' complaint concerning the length of proceedings in respect of parcels nos. 19, 21, 32, 38 and 39 appear in applications nos. 44922/06, 45016/06, 50158/06 and 10878/07. The final decisions in respect of these parcels were delivered on 13 April 2006 and 29 June 2006. Applications nos. 44922/06, 45016/06 and 50158/06 were lodged with the Court on 6 and 11 October 2006, within the six-month time limit, whereas application no. 10878/07 was introduced on 13 February 2007, more than six months after the applicants had been served with the final decision on 18 July 2006.
17. It follows that the applicants' complaints in application no. 10878/07 with regard to the parcels nos. 19, 21, 32, 38 and 39 must be rejected for failure to comply with the six-months rule within the meaning of Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.
18. In this connection, the Court notes that the complaints regarding parcel no. 37 in application no. 10878/07 remain within the six-month time limit as the final decision was delivered on 19 October 2006. All of the applicants in application no. 10878/07, except Mehmet Koçhan and Mehmet Zeki Karataş, have also complained about the length of proceedings regarding parcel no. 37. The Court will therefore confine its examination of application no. 10878/07 to parcel no. 37 and the remaining applicants other than the two mentioned above.
19. The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
B. Merits
20. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicants in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
21. The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above; and Karataş and Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, nos. 4889/05, 4897/05, 24009/05, 33694/05, 37759/05, 42996/06, 43031/06, 43019/06, 43038/06 and 43054/06, 16 July 2009).
22. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court considers that the Government have not put forward any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion in the present cases. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant applications the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.
There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1.
III. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION
23. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the applicants firstly asserted that the initial registration of the land in the name of the Treasury had violated their right to property. Secondly, they complained that they had been deprived of their land pending the domestic proceedings, which had been incompatible with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. In conjunction with this complaint they added, under Article 14 of the Convention, that many people in other regions had acquired title to their land whereas they had had to resort to litigation to obtain their entitlement. The applicants lastly maintained, under Article 13 in conjunction with Article 6 of the Convention, that there had been no effective remedy for the interference with their property by the authorities.
24. The Government contested these allegations and argued that the applicants did not have victim status.
25. The Court notes that these complaints are closely linked to the one examined above and must therefore likewise be declared admissible, except for the complaints of Mehmet Koçhan and Mehmet Zeki Karataş which were lodged outside the six-month time limit (see paragraph 18 above).
26. However, having regard to its finding of a violation of Article 6 § 1 (see paragraph 22 above), the Court does not consider it necessary to examine the merits of these complaints separately (Ezel Tosun v. Turkey, no. 33379/02, § 28, 10 January 2006; and Karataş and Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, cited above).
IV. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
27. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
A. Damage
28. The applicants claimed various amounts in respect of pecuniary damage calculated on the basis of the size of the land in question and EUR 5,000 per person per procedure in respect of non-pecuniary damage. The Government contested these claims.
29. The Court does not discern any causal link between the violation found and the pecuniary damage alleged; it therefore rejects this claim.
30. As for the non-pecuniary damage, the Court observes that a common interest was at issue in all eighteen cases before the Court. They were introduced in the same year by inhabitants of the same village pursuing the same objective, namely claiming title to different parcels of land. All one hundred fifty-four applicants were represented by the same lawyer, both in the domestic proceedings and before the Court. The length of the proceedings at issue varies between some fifteen and eighteen years. One hundred and forty one of the applicants were simultaneously involved in multiple proceedings claiming title to different parcels. Only thirteen applicants claimed titles to a single parcel.
31. Having regard to the foregoing, the Court notes that the extension of the impugned proceedings beyond a “reasonable time” undoubtedly caused the applicants non-pecuniary damage which would justify an award. It also takes into consideration the number of applicants, the nature of the violation found and the need to determine the amount in such a way that the overall sum is compatible with the relevant case-law and is reasonable in the light of what was at stake in the proceedings in question. In the light of the Kakamoukas and Others v. Greece case and the above background, the Court considers that all the applicants must be awarded the same amount , irrespective of the number of domestic proceedings brought for different plots (see, mutatis mutandis, Kakamoukas and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 38311/02, § 48, 15 February 2008; and Karataş and Yıldız and Others v. Turkey, cited above). Consequently, irrespective of the number of sets of proceedings concerned, it awards each of the applicants EUR 5,000 for non-pecuniary damage, except Mehmet Ataç and Mehmet Azak (see paragraph 9 above) as well as Mehmet Koçhan and Mehmet Zeki Karataş (see paragraph 18 above). Consequently, ruling on an equitable basis, it awards each of the thirty applicants whose complaints have been declared admissible the full sum claimed under the non-pecuniary damage head (EUR 5,000).
B. Costs and expenses
32. The applicants also claimed EUR 2,000 for each of the eighteen applications in respect of the costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and EUR 3,000 per person for those incurred before the Court. The Government contested these claims.
33. According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and were reasonable as to quantum. In the present case, the Court observes that the applicants did not produce any document in support of their claims. Accordingly, the Court makes no award under this head.
C. Default interest
34. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1. Decides to join the applications;
2. Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in respect of Mehmet Ataç and Mehmet Azak in application nos. 50158/06, 44922/06 and 10878/07;
3. Declares the applications admissible, except for the complaints in application no. 10878/07 with regard to the parcels nos. 19, 21, 32, 38 and 39 which are declared inadmissible;
4. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention;
5. Holds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;
6. Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) to each of the applicants, except Mehmet Ataç, Mehmet Azak, Mehmet Koçhan and Mehmet Zeki Karataş, in respect of non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
7. Dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claim for just satisfaction.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 September, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Françoise Elens-Passos Françoise Tulkens
Deputy RegistrarPresident
Application name and no,
parcel no,
domestic file no (where necessary)
Beginning date of the proceedings
Date of the final decision
Notification date (where necessary)
Date of introduction before the Court
Overall length of proceedings
1
Şenyürek and Şahin (34986/05)
Parcels nos. 166, 167, 168
25.09.1989
14.04.2005
05.09.2005
15 years, 6 months, 22 days
2
Eroğlu and Others (34987/05)
Parcel no. 15
19.09.1989
07.04. 2005
05.09.2005
15 years, 6 months, 21 days
3
Gondon and Kaya (35070/05)
Parcels nos. 169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175, 176
09.09.1989
07.06.2005
05.09.2005
15 years, 9 months, 1 day
4
Gündüz and Others (41921/06)
Parcel no. 41
21.09.1989
27.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 9 days
5
Mehmet Nuri Bingöl and Others (44922/06)
Parcel no. 45
25.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 21 days
Parcel no. 51
25.09.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 28 days
Parcel no. 32
(domestic file no. 2005/56)
19.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 27 days
6
Abdullah Çoban and Others (44959/06)
Parcel no. 28
26.09.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 27 days
Parcel no. 46
25.01.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
17 years, 2 months, 21 days
Parcel no. 37
18.09.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 5 days
7
Abdullah Kaya and Others (44979/06)
Parcel no. 6
06.10.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 10 days
Parcel nos. 16 and 60
09.10.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 14 days
Parcel no. 34
04.10.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 19 days
Parcel no. 53
04.10.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 12 days
8
Halil Koçhan and Others (44983/06)
Parcel no. 30
22.09.1989
20.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 1 day
Parcel no. 247
19.09.1989
27.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 11 days
Parcel no. 37
19.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 27 days
9
Elif Özbey and Others (45016/06)
Parcel no. 32 and 35
(domestic file no. 2005/151)
19.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 27 days
10
Turgut Gündüz and 7 others (45069/06)
Parcel no. 35
21.09.1989
04.05.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 14 days
11
Heves Yıldırım and Others (45096/06)
Parcel no. 18
18.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 28 days
12
Sultan Ataç and Mehmet Ballı (45100/06)
Parcel no. 27
23.09.1989
04.05.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 14 days
13
Sabrı Çallı and Others (45115/06)
Parcel no. 20
26.09.1989
13.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 20 days
14
Abdurrahman Sönmezer and Others (45127/06)
Parcel no. 5
25.09.1989
27.04.2006
06.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 5 days
15
Sadık Kaya and Others (50158/06)
Parcel no. 17
14.09.1989
04.05.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 23 days
Parcel no. 18
23.01.1989
04.05.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 3 months, 14 days
Parcel no. 19
07.09.1989
29.06.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 9 months, 25 days
Parcel no. 21
07.09.1989
29.06.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 9 months, 25 days
Parcel no. 22
25.09.1989
27.04.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 5 days
Parcel no. 26
10.03.1989
01.06.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 2 months, 26 days
Parcel no. 29
23.01.1989
04.05.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 3 months, 14 days
Parcel no. 32
23.01.1989
29.06.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 3 months, 14 days
Parcel no. 33
23.01.1989
27.04.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 3 months, 7 days
Parcel no. 38
23.01.1989
29.06.2006
11.10.2006
17 years, 5 months, 9 days
Parcel no. 39
07.09.1989
29.06.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 9 months, 25 days
Parcel no. 52
04.10.1989
27.04.2006
11.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 26 days
16
Haydar Taştan and Others (50159/06)
Parcel no. 1
25.09.1989
27.04.2006
04.10.2006
17 years, 0 months, 13 days
Parcel no. 3
21.09.1989
27.04.2006
04.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 9 days
Parcel no. 8
21.09.1989
04.05.2006
04.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 16 days
Parcel no. 9
06.10.1989
20.04.2006
04.10.2006
16 years, 6 months, 17 days
Parcel no. 10
21.09.1989
27.04.2006
04.10.2006
17 years, 0 months, 17 days
Parcel no. 11
21.09.1989
04.05.2006
04.10.2006
16 years, 7 months, 16 days
Parcel no. 58
21.09.1989
27.04.2006
04.10.2006
17 years, 0 months, 17 days
17
Ahmet Koçhan and Others (10878/07)
Parcel no. 38
(domestic file no. 2005/54)
23.01.1989
29.06.2006
18.07.2006
13.02.2007
17 years, 5 months, 9 days
Parcel no. 32
(domestic file no. 2005/55)
23.01.1989
29.06.2006
18.07.2006
13.02.2007
17 years, 5 months, 9 days
Parcel no. 19
(domestic file no. 2005/152)
23.01.1989
29.06.2006
18.07.2006
13.02.2007
17 years, 5 months, 9 days
Parcel no. 39
(domestic file no. 2005/49)
07.09.1989
29.06.2006
18.07.2006
13.02.2007
16 years, 9 months, 25 days
Parcel no. 21
(domestic file no. 2005/72)
07.09.1989
29.06.2006
18.07.2006
13.02.2007
16 years, 9 months, 25 days
Parcel no. 37
18.09.1989
19.10.2006
13.02.2007
17 years, 1 month, 5 days
18
Abdurrahman Çelik and Turan Çelik (24160/08)
Parcel no. 36
23.01.1989
29.11.2007
15.05.2008
18 years, 10 months, 10 days
Applicant name, year of birth
parcel no.
Application no.
1
Abdülbari Kaya, 1966 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
2
Abdülkadir Kaya, 1975 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
3
Abdulkerim Şahin, 1956
35
45069/06
4
Abdullah Ağlar, 1964 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
5
Abdullah Çoban, 1920
28
51
38
44959/06
44922/06
50158/06
6
Abdullah Doğan, 1963 (heir)
26
37
50158/06
10787/07
7
Abdullah Kaya, 1954
6
1
10
11
(169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175, 176)
44979/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
35070/05
8
Abdullah Şahin, 1942
17
26
38
39
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
9
Abdullah Turhan, 1948
19
29
37
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
10
Abdullah Türkeş, 1933
5
22
26
29
32
33
37
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
11
Abdurrahman Çelik, 1954
29
37
36
50158/06
10878/07
24160/08
12
Abdurrahman Sönmezer, 1948
45
5
22
44922/06
45127/06
50158/06
13
Abdurrahman Turhan, 1954
45
17
18
29
37
44922/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
14
Ahmet Koçhan, 1945
32
19
39
21
37
10878/07
10878/07
10878/07
10787/07
10787/07
15
Ahmet Yıldız, 1932
51
(16, 60)
5
26
44922/06
44979/06
45127/06
50158/06
16
Alaaddin Gündüz, 1948
37
10878/07
17
Ali İhsan Şenyürek, 1940
17
(166,167,198)
50158/06
34986/05
18
Ali Musa Özbey, 1965 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
19
Ali Rıza Ağlar, 1956 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
20
Ali Şahin, 1940
19
26
32
39
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
21
Ali Turhan, 1948
35
19
26
29
37
45069/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
22
Almast Akbal (Kaya), 1945 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
23
Aydın Şahin, 1955
37
10878/07
24
Baran Savaş (Kaya), 1961 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
25
Celal Yıldırım, 1950 (heir)
32
37
18
26
44922/06
44959/06
45096/06
50158/06
26
Celalettin Bingöl, 1952
1
3
9
10
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
27
Cemil Yıldırım, 1953
Cemil Yıldırım, 1953 (heir)
38
32
33
39
32
37
18
26
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
44922/06
44959/06
45096/06
50158/06
28
Cemile Çelik (Kaya), (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
29
Cihat Şahin, 1963
37
10878/07
30
Cindi Gündüz, 1921
45
22
26
44922/06
50158/06
50158/06
31
Derviş Yıldız, 1945
19
26
32
38
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
32
Dilşah Ağlar, 1982 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
33
Dilşah Bingöltekin (Kaya), 1974 (heir)
17
19
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
34
Doğan Özbey, 1978 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
35
Ekrem Şahin, 1951
37
10878/07
36
Elif Özbey, 1961 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
37
Emine Tanrıverdi, 1923 (heir)
247
20
21
44983/06
45115/06
50158/06
38
Fahrettin Bingöl, 1964
9
3
8
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
39
Faruk Ağlar, 1986 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
40
Felemez Yıldız, 1960
19
1
3
8
9
10
11
58
50158/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
41
Ferhat Kaya, 1992
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
42
Ferika Kaya, 1939 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
43
Ferman Şenyürek, 1964
1
3
10
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
44
Fesi Kaya, 1974 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
45
Feyat Doğan, 1967 (heir)
26
37
50158/06
10787/07
46
Giyasettin Bingöl, 1950
1
3
8
9
10
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
47
Gıyasettin Yıldız, 1954
5
18
45127/06
50158/06
48
Güler Aydın (Özbey), 1975 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
49
Gülhanım Özgül, 1960
35
5
26
38
45069/06
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
50
Güli Kaya, 1933
5
19
52
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
51
Güvercin Akın (Kaya), (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
52
Hacer Yalçıner (Ağlar), 1971 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
53
Halil Koçhan, 1940
30
44983/06
54
Halil Savaş, 1938
3
8
37
52
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
10787/07
50158/06
50159/06
50159/06
55
Halil Yılmaz, 1967
38
37
50158/06
10878/07
56
Hamza Gündüz, 1956
41
45
34
35
19
22
26
29
41921/06
44922/06
44979/06
45069/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
57
Hanım Kızıl (Doğan), 1966
26
37
50158/06
10878/07
58
Hanım Kaya, (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
59
Hasan Demirci, 1931
15
3
38
33
34987/05
50159/06
50158/06
50158/06
60
Hasan Şahin, 1947
32
39
(166,167,198)
50158/06
50158/06
34986/05
61
Hasan Turhan, 1968
8
41
19
1
9
10
11
58
3
50159/06
41921/06
50158/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
62
Haşim Gündön, 1951
19
32
39
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
63
Hatun Demirbağ (Doğan), 1971 (heir)
26
37
50158/06
10878/07
64
Haydar Daştan, 1949
3
8
10
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
65
Hayrettin Koçhan, 1959
32
19
39
21
37
10878/07
10878/07
10878/07
10787/07
10787/07
66
Hazal Kaya, 1953 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
67
Hazal Kaya, 1970 (heir)
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
68
Hediye Ağlar, 1976 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
69
Hediye Kaya, 1975 (heir)
17
52
19
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
70
Hediye Yılmaz, 1943 (heir)
247
20
21
44983/06
45115/06
50158/06
71
Heves Yıldırım, 1925 (heir)
32
37
18
26
44922/06
44959/06
45096/06
50158/06
72
Hüseyin Arslan, 1938
37
10787/07
73
Hüseyin Tanrıverdi, (heir)1959
247
20
21
44983/06
45115/06
50158/06
74
İbrahim Ataç, 1944
5
17
18
26
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
75
İbrahim Çelik, 1954
26
29
37
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
76
İbrahim Tunç, 1948
18
26
29
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
77
İsa Deniz, 1948
41
35
26
41921/06
45069/06
50158/06
78
İsmail Akbulut, 1934
1
3
8
10
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
79
İzzettin Turhan, 1941
28
20
17
26
29
44959/06
45115/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
80
İzzettin Savaş, 1952
39
3
8
11
58
37
50158/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
10787/07
81
Kader Kaya, 1991
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
82
Kamer Özbey, 1983 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
83
Kazim Özbey, 1974 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
84
Köroğlu Ağlar, 1974 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
85
Kumriye Şahin (Kaya), 1956 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
86
Kutbettin Gündüz, 1936
22
26
37
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
87
M.Emin Han, 1938
38
37
50158/06
10878/07
88
Mehmet Sait Tunç, 1953
46
17
18
26
37
44959/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
89
Mahmut Gündön, 1935
26
33
38
37
(169, 170, 171, 173, 174, 175, 176)
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
35070/05
90
Mahmut Kaya, 1975 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
91
Mahmut Sönmezer, 1965
35
26
29
37
45069/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
92
Mahmut Şahin, 1945
17
26
32
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
93
Mahmut Yıldız, 1922
18
41
5
17
26
50158/06
41921/06
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
94
Makbule Ağlar, 1979 (heir)
37
44983/06
95
Mehmet Ağlar, 1961 (heir)
Mehmet Ağlar, 1961
19
37
18
37
50158/06
44983/06
50158/06
10878/07
96
Mehmet Ataç, 1978
38
50158/06
97
Mehmet Atik Kaya, 1981 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
98
Mehmet Azak, 1931
51
37
44922/06
10878/07
99
Mehmet Ballı, 1950
35
27
17
18
19
26
45069/06
45100/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
100
Mehmet Bingöl, 1938
41
17
18
19
22
26
41921/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
101
Mehmet Degertaş, 1918
37
10878/07
102
Mehmet Emin Karataş, 1930
19
39
50158/06
50158/06
103
Mehmet Eroğlu, 1922
15
33
38
39
34987/05
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
104
Mehmet Karataş, 1960
20
19
21
32
38
39
45115/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
105
Mehmet Koçhan, 1946
39
10878/07
106
Mehmet Nuri Bingöl, 1965
45
52
37
44922/06
50158/06
10787/07
107
Mehmet Sait Yıldırım, 1933
26
33
38
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
108
Mehmet Salih Kaya, 1988
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
109
Mehmet Şerif Aktaş, 1965
(16, 60)
38
44979/06
50158/06
110
MehmetŞirin Kaya, 1983 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
111
Mehmet Yıldız, 1949
38
50158/06
112
M.Zeki Çoban, 1952
37
33
39
10878/07
50158/06
50158/06
113
Mehmet Zeki Karataş, 1933
38
32
39
10878/07
10878/07
10787/07
114
Memet Şerif Yıldırım, 1956 (heir)
32
37
18
26
44922/06
44959/06
45096/06
50158/06
115
Melik Kaya, 1993 (heir)
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
116
Meral Kaya, 1988 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
117
Mikail Tunç, 1961
1
3
10
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
118
Muhabbet Bingöl, 1943
18
26
50158/06
50158/06
119
Muhlis Kaya, 1964
17
29
50158/06
50158/06
120
Muhyettin Işıklı, 1947
38
37
50158/06
10878/07
121
Musa Güneş, 1917
29
38
50158/06
50158/06
122
Mustafa Oktan, 1954
17
26
29
37
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
123
Mustafa Şahin, 1935
26
32
37
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
124
Mustafa Türkeş, 1931
5
26
29
32
33
38
37
45127/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
125
Muzaffer Şahin, 1959
37
10878/07
126
Müşkinaz Özbey, 1934
39
37
50158/06
10878/07
127
Nusrettin Şahin, 1955
21
32
39
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
128
Nüsrettin Özdemir, 1934
30
19
26
44983/06
50158/06
50158/06
129
Orhan Bingöl, 1961
1
3
8
10
11
58
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
130
Raziye Şahin (Kaya), 1957 (heir)
17
52
50158/06
50158/06
131
Remziye Deniz (Kaya), 1971 (heir)
52
50158/06
132
Resul Çoban, 1946
33
38
37
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
133
Reyhan Alp (Kaya), 1980 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
134
Sabrı Çallı, 1938
20
32
33
38
45115/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
135
Sadık Kaya, 1951
Sadık Kaya, 1951 (heir)
32
33
38
39
37
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
10787/07
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
136
Selahattin Ataç, 1964
41
46
53
18
26
41921/06
44959/06
44979/06
50158/06
50158/06
137
Seracettin Koçhan, 1958
32
19
39
21
37
10878/07
10878/07
10878/07
10787/07
10787/07
138
Sultan Ataç, 1935
41
27
18
29
37
41921/06
45100/06
50158/06
50158/06
10878/07
139
Subhan Aksoy (Kaya), 1973 (heir)
19
26
38
52
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
140
Şadiye Biçer (Ağlar), 1959 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
141
Şevfik Şahin, 1960
26
33
50158/06
50158/06
142
Tevfik Şahin, 1948
26
33
50158/06
50158/06
143
Tuncay Doğan, 1978 (heir)
26
37
50158/06
10878/07
144
Turabi Eligüzel, 1929
38
50158/06
145
Turan Çelik, 1939
30
38
37
36
44983/06
50158/06
10878/07
24160/08
146
Turgut Gündüz, 1933
41
35
26
41921/06
45069/06
50158/06
147
Turgut Kaya, 1990
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
148
Ünal Kaya, 1986
19
37
10878/07
10878/07
149
Vahdettin Turhan, 1952
28
20
17
26
29
44959/06
45115/06
50158/06
50158/06
50158/06
150
Vahide Ağlar, 1939 (heir)
37
19
44983/06
50158/06
151
Yadigar İlkay (Özbey), 1972 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
152
Yasin Savaş, 1961
15
3
8
11
58
37
34987/05
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
50159/06
10787/07
153
Yıldız Doğan, 1924 (heir)
26
37
50158/06
10787/07
154
Yusuf Özbey, 1969 (heir)
(32, 35)
39
37
45016/06
50158/06
10878/07
Full & Egal Universal Law Academy