SECOND SECTION
CASE OF SERT AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE
(Applications nos. 15659/20 and 206 others)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
3 December 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Sert and Others v. Türkiye,
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Pauliine Koskelo, President,
Jovan Ilievski,
Davor Derenčinović, judges,
and Dorothee von Arnim, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to:
the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;
the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 5 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion regarding the commission of an offence, the alleged lack of relevant and sufficient reasons when ordering and extending the pre-trial detention, the length of pre-trial detention, the ineffectiveness of the judicial review of the lawfulness of detention and the absence of a remedy to obtain compensation to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their then Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, former Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Turkey, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the applications;
the parties’ observations;
the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;
Having deliberated in private on 12 November 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE
1. The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (for further background information see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 3-9 and §§ 106-07, 20 July 2021).
2. On various dates, the applicants were arrested and placed in pre-trial detention, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, § 58, 3 March 2020). The detention orders relied principally on the nature of the alleged offence, the state of the evidence and the potential sentence. It was also noted that investigations into the coup attempt were being conducted across the country, that statements had not yet been taken from all the suspects and that the alleged offence was among the “catalogue” offences listed in Article 100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) (for the text of Article 100 of the CCP, as relevant, see Baş, cited above, § 61). It appears from the initial detention orders and the documents available in the case files that the majority of the applicants were identified as users of the ByLock messaging system. Moreover, some of the applicants were suspected of being affiliated with the FETÖ/PDY based on witness statements, or of financing the FETÖ/PDY in view of their use of accounts in Bank Asya – a bank allegedly linked to FETÖ/PDY –, possession of pro-FETÖ/PDY publications and/or United States one-dollar bills with an “F” serial number (denoting the initial of the forename “Fetullah”), and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. The challenges brought by the applicants against their detention, including by reason of the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion of having committed the offence imputed to them, were dismissed, including by the Constitutional Court.
3. According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts. It appears that, in some of the applications, the criminal proceedings are still pending before appeal courts or the Constitutional Court.
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS4. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION5. The applicants complained that there had been no specific evidence giving rise to a reasonable suspicion, within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention, that they had committed a criminal offence necessitating, in particular, their initial pre-trial detention.
6. The Government urged the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible in respect of the applicants who had not made use of the compensatory remedy under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or whose compensation claims were still pending. They further asked the Court to declare the applications inadmissible for abuse of the right of application to the extent that the applicants had not informed the Court of the developments in their cases following the lodging of their applications.
7. The Court notes that similar objections have already been dismissed in other cases against Türkiye (see, for instance, Baş, cited above, §§ 118-21, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 57-64, 23 November 2021), and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.
8. The Court notes that, when ordering the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, the magistrate’s courts sought to justify their decisions by making a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”. However, in doing so, they simply cited the wording of the provision in question, without actually specifying what the evidence in question entailed and why it constituted a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. The Court refers in this connection to its findings in the judgment of Baş (cited above, §§ 190‑95), according to which the vague and general references to the wording of Article 100 of the CCP and to the evidence in the file cannot be regarded as sufficient to justify the “reasonableness” of the suspicion on which the applicants’ detention was supposed to have been based, in the absence either of a specific assessment of the individual items of evidence in the file, or of any information available in the file at the material time that could have justified the suspicion against the applicants, or of any other kinds of verifiable material or facts.
9. The Court further notes that the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention orders were mainly based on information indicating their use of the ByLock messaging system, banking activities considered as financing the FETÖ/PDY, subscriptions to certain pro-FETÖ/PDY publications, having in their possessions United States one‑dollar bills with an “F” serial number, and/or their employment by and/or memberships in FETÖ/PDY-affiliated institutions and organisations. To the extent that the detention orders have taken into account the applicants’ alleged use of the ByLock messaging system, the Court notes that it has already found that the use of ByLock alone was not of a nature to constitute “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) in respect of the offence attributed to the applicants (see Akgün v. Turkey, no. 19699/18, §§ 151-85, 20 July 2021, and Taner Kılıç v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 208/18, §§102-03 and 106-09, 31 May 2022). The Court also notes that as regards some of the applicants, the Government have referred to the existence of witness statements justifying the measures in question. It observes, however, that there are no statements in the case files referring to concrete and specific facts that may have given rise to a reasonable suspicion against the applicants concerned at the material time. The Court further considers, as relevant, that the other acts imputed to the applicants (see paragraph 2 above) were merely circumstantial elements which, in the absence of any other information capable of justifying the suspicions in question, benefited from the presumption of legality and cannot reasonably be regarded as constituting a body of evidence demonstrating the applicants’ membership of a terrorist organisation (compare Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 104-05 and the cases cited therein).
10. Since the Government have not provided any other indications, “facts” or “information” capable of satisfying it that the applicants were “reasonably suspected”, at the time of their initial detention, of having committed the alleged offence, the Court finds that the requirements of Article 5 § 1 (c) regarding the “reasonableness” of a suspicion justifying detention have not been satisfied (see Baş, cited above, § 195, and Taner Kılıç, cited above, §§ 114-16). At this juncture, it cannot be maintained, as the Government argued in their observations, that the fact that the applicants were not members of the judiciary had any bearing on the conclusion reached. It finally considers that while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt – that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (compare Baş, cited above, §§ 115-16 and §§ 196‑201). It therefore concludes that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention.
OTHER COMPLAINTS11. As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
12. The applicants, except for the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non‑pecuniary damage within the time-limit allotted. Most of the applicants in question also claimed pecuniary damage, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.
13. The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.
14. For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑07), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants, save for the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence, admissible;Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the lack of reasonable suspicion, at the time of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention, that they had committed an offence;Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, with the exception of the applicants in applications nos. 17398/20, 21419/20, 32063/20, 39043/20, 41885/20, 47622/20, 51256/20, 51814/20, 41/21, 1386/21, 1969/21, 2000/21, 3082/21, 3454/21, 37266/21 and 39745/21, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on this amount, which is to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.Done in English, and notified in writing on 3 December 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Dorothee von Arnim Pauliine Koskelo
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of cases:
No.
Application no.
Case name
Lodged on
Applicant
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Nationality
Represented by
1.
15659/20
Sert v. Türkiye
12/03/2020
İzzetdin SERT
1986
Aydın
Turkish
Turgay KALE
2.
16027/20
Ateş v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Kenan ATEŞ
1971
Konya
Turkish
3.
16033/20
Demirci v. Türkiye
18/03/2020
Mehmet DEMİRCİ
1978
Hatay
Turkish
Ali Berk SABANOGLU
4.
16045/20
Ateş v. Türkiye
18/03/2020
Ramazan ATEŞ
1990
İzmir
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
5.
16046/20
Cebesoy v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Halil CEBESOY
1971
Manisa
Turkish
6.
16061/20
Karakuş v. Türkiye
16/03/2020
Özcan KARAKUŞ
1974
Konya
Turkish
İlyas KARATAŞ
7.
16110/20
Kiremit v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Ahmet KİREMİT
1990
Aksaray
Turkish
Akerke ABDYKALYKOVA ONAT
8.
16180/20
Yuvarlak v. Türkiye
19/03/2020
İlhan YUVARLAK
1977
İstanbul
Turkish
Yeliz HANOĞLU
9.
16384/20
Topdemir v. Türkiye
17/03/2020
Mehmet TOPDEMİR
1980
Ankara
Turkish
Hacer TOPDEMİR
10.
16392/20
Uyanık v. Türkiye
26/03/2020
Mustafa UYANIK
1974
Mersin
Turkish
Akil SIRKINTI
11.
16442/20
Tekin v. Türkiye
20/03/2020
Mustafa TEKİN
1982
Konya
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
12.
16447/20
Doğan v. Türkiye
19/03/2020
Tuncay DOĞAN
1975
Ankara
Turkish
Mustafa SOYLU
13.
16487/20
Alemdar v. Türkiye
27/03/2020
Ender ALEMDAR
1975
Zonguldak
Turkish
Erdi KOSTİK
14.
16566/20
Telo v. Türkiye
13/03/2020
Cihat TELO
1982
Kocaeli
Turkish
Şule Şükran TELO
15.
16573/20
Keskin v. Türkiye
13/03/2020
Yener KESKİN
1982
Kayseri
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
16.
16781/20
Kiremit v. Türkiye
26/03/2020
Zehra KİREMİT
1991
Aksaray
Turkish
Akerke ABDYKALYKOVA ONAT
17.
16843/20
Kenru v. Türkiye
26/03/2020
Cumali KENRU
1981
Adana
Turkish
Akil SIRKINTI
18.
16844/20
Alpay v. Türkiye
26/03/2020
Ekrem ALPAY
1972
Ankara
Turkish
19.
16852/20
Özcan v. Türkiye
16/03/2020
Mehmet Ali ÖZCAN
1969
Konya
Turkish
İhsan MAKAS
20.
16862/20
Aslan v. Türkiye
23/03/2020
Tunçay ASLAN
1969
Bursa
Turkish
21.
16904/20
Balık v. Türkiye
09/04/2020
Onur BALIK
1992
Kocaeli
Turkish
Davut UĞUR
22.
16912/20
Sevinç v. Türkiye
27/03/2020
Bılal SEVİNÇ
1972
Ankara
Turkish
23.
16946/20
Karadayi v. Türkiye
02/04/2020
Halil KARADAYI
1990
Balıkesir
Turkish
Huseyin KARADAYI
24.
16947/20
Buldu v. Türkiye
19/03/2020
Furkan BULDU
1985
Antalya
Turkish
25.
17015/20
Ak v. Türkiye
14/04/2020
Aydın AK
1975
Kütahya
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
26.
17398/20
Aygün v. Türkiye
09/04/2020
Maruf AYGÜN
1994
Batman
Turkish
27.
17441/20
Akyol v. Türkiye
03/04/2020
Aytaç AKYOL
1980
Kırşehir
Turkish
Dudu ERTUNÇ
28.
17478/20
Bozdağ v. Türkiye
03/04/2020
Veysel BOZDAĞ
1981
Denizli
Turkish
Enes Malik KILIÇ
29.
17693/20
Horozcu v. Türkiye
03/04/2020
Ali HOROZCU
1974
Burdur
Turkish
Zülal BÜKER
30.
17919/20
Demir v. Türkiye
13/04/2020
Fatih DEMİR
1975
Giresun
Turkish
Levent MAZILIGÜNEY
31.
17968/20
Keskin v. Türkiye
17/04/2020
Ali KESKİN
1975
Trabzon
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
32.
18743/20
Yükler v. Türkiye
21/04/2020
Murat YÜKLER
1987
Kilis
Turkish
33.
19024/20
Sağlık v. Türkiye
22/04/2020
Ahmet Faruk SAĞLIK
1989
Samsun
Turkish
Muhammed Nuh POLAT
34.
19145/20
Orhan v. Türkiye
07/05/2020
Yalçın ORHAN
1967
İzmir
Turkish
Mustafa ORHAN
35.
19180/20
Adem v. Türkiye
06/05/2020
Muzaffer ADEM
1963
Aydın
Turkish
36.
20046/20
Gülenç v. Türkiye
19/03/2020
Murat GÜLENÇ
1979
Manisa
Turkish
Gönül GÜLENÇ
37.
20426/20
Altun v. Türkiye
30/04/2020
Sadullah ALTUN
1972
İstanbul
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
38.
20843/20
İlter v. Türkiye
30/04/2020
Ramazan İLTER
1990
İstanbul
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
39.
20850/20
Gözütok v. Türkiye
12/05/2020
Mevlüt GÖZÜTOK
1981
Yalova
Turkish
Hülya GÖZÜTOK
40.
20990/20
Tezcan v. Türkiye
28/04/2020
Ertan TEZCAN
1974
Konya
Turkish
Sema TEZCAN
41.
21194/20
Lafcı v. Türkiye
06/05/2020
Burak LAFCI
1991
Mersin
Turkish
Halime LAFCI
42.
21320/20
Tekin v. Türkiye
08/04/2020
Ali TEKİN
1984
Isparta
Turkish
Muhammed Talha YILMAZ
43.
21419/20
Öztürk v. Türkiye
05/05/2020
Mehmet ÖZTÜRK
1982
Bursa
Turkish
Filiz SELVİ ÖZTÜRK
44.
21462/20
Koçoğlu v. Türkiye
29/04/2020
Muammer Mecid KOÇOĞLU
1989
Balıkesir
Turkish
Hilal BALIKÇI
45.
21730/20
Aktunç v. Türkiye
27/04/2020
Arslan AKTUNÇ
1980
Konya
Turkish
Samet YILMAZ
46.
21770/20
Adiyeke v. Türkiye
11/05/2020
Ümran ADİYEKE
1992
Siirt
Turkish
Mehmet SATICI
47.
22976/20
Ateş v. Türkiye
21/05/2020
Ramazan ATEŞ
1982
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Ali ATEŞ
48.
23035/20
Taşcı v. Türkiye
08/06/2020
Faruk Aydın TAŞCI
1983
İzmir
Turkish
49.
23055/20
Şaşmaz v. Türkiye
22/05/2020
Yusuf ŞAŞMAZ
1988
İstanbul
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
50.
23075/20
Demir v. Türkiye
22/05/2020
Osman DEMİR
1976
Bursa
Turkish
51.
23153/20
Özkan v. Türkiye
08/05/2020
Murat ÖZKAN
1975
Bolu
Turkish
Fatma ÖZTÜRK
52.
23317/20
Meydan v. Türkiye
13/05/2020
Muzaffer MEYDAN
1981
Balıkesir
Turkish
Hakan EFE
53.
23361/20
Ayva v. Türkiye
27/05/2020
Ali AYVA
1973
Ankara
Turkish
54.
23687/20
Baysal v. Türkiye
13/05/2020
Ali İhsan BAYSAL
1965
Balıkesir
Turkish
Mustafa ÇABAS
55.
23691/20
Yumurtacı v. Türkiye
15/05/2020
Murat YUMURTACI
1976
Karabük
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
56.
23894/20
Dal v. Türkiye
27/05/2020
Adem DAL
1990
Erzincan
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
57.
24024/20
Ataş v. Türkiye
29/05/2020
Aşkın ATAŞ
1983
Sivas
Turkish
Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
58.
24050/20
Gökalp v. Türkiye
03/06/2020
Halim GÖKALP
1986
Ankara
Turkish
59.
24103/20
Çiçek v. Türkiye
29/05/2020
Mustafa ÇİÇEK
1980
Samsun
Turkish
Tahir EREN
60.
24275/20
Adıgüzel v. Türkiye
01/06/2020
Remzi ADIGÜZEL
1973
İstanbul
Turkish
Fikret ADIGÜZEL
61.
24405/20
Yorulmaz v. Türkiye
15/05/2020
Tümay YORULMAZ
1982
Eskişehir
Turkish
62.
24639/20
Baydovan v. Türkiye
10/06/2020
Mustafa BAYDOVAN
1992
Mersin
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
63.
24659/20
Arslan v. Türkiye
21/05/2020
Metin ARSLAN
1976
Eskisehir
Turkish
Ulviye Özge CAZ ÖZKAYA
64.
24843/20
Atlar v. Türkiye
10/06/2020
Yusuf ATLAR
1983
Hatay
Turkish
65.
25219/20
Ulaş v. Türkiye
05/06/2020
İdris ULAŞ
1984
Ankara
Turkish
66.
25520/20
Tercan v. Türkiye
05/06/2020
Muhittin TERCAN
1983
Bursa
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
67.
25546/20
Akbaba v. Türkiye
24/06/2020
Mahmut Temur AKBABA
1989
Aydın
Turkish
68.
25785/20
Kılıç v. Türkiye
19/06/2020
Yavuz KILIÇ
1984
Aydın
Turkish
Ömer Faruk YILDIRIM
69.
26804/20
Karabacak v. Türkiye
09/06/2020
Ensar KARABACAK
1966
Balıkesir
Turkish
Burcu HAS
70.
26836/20
Güngör v. Türkiye
11/06/2020
Faruk GÜNGÖR
1979
Aksaray
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
71.
26901/20
Kardaş v. Türkiye
11/06/2020
Ömer KARDAŞ
1974
Erzurum
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
72.
27091/20
Gültekin v. Türkiye
24/06/2020
Abdurrezzak GÜLTEKİN
1989
Aydın
Turkish
Funda GÜLTEKİN
73.
27142/20
Batmaz v. Türkiye
18/06/2020
Gonca BATMAZ
1977
Kütahya
Turkish
Ayten İZMIRLİ
74.
27268/20
Kaya v. Türkiye
19/06/2020
Alican KAYA
1990
Balıkesir
Turkish
Burcu HAS
75.
27271/20
Yavuz v. Türkiye
12/06/2020
Bilal YAVUZ
1989
Ankara
Turkish
Hakan EFE
76.
27404/20
Özcan v. Türkiye
05/06/2020
Hasan ÖZCAN
1975
İzmir
Turkish
Yunus Cevher KAVÇAKAR
77.
27911/20
Sözen v. Türkiye
01/07/2020
Yaşar SÖZEN
1980
Samsun
Turkish
Tolga UÇAR
78.
28026/20
Yalçın v. Türkiye
19/06/2020
Osman YALÇIN
1979
İstanbul
Turkish
Sümeyye Sema COŞAN
79.
28357/20
Şenocak v. Türkiye
10/06/2020
Fevzi Cem ŞENOCAK
1972
Samsun
Turkish
80.
28890/20
Çevik v. Türkiye
01/07/2020
Murat ÇEVİK
1977
Kayseri
Turkish
Beytullah ÖZTÜRK
81.
28936/20
Kavçakar v. Türkiye
10/06/2020
Emre KAVÇAKAR
1990
Burdur
Turkish
Yunus Cevher KAVÇAKAR
82.
29075/20
Uğur v. Türkiye
23/06/2020
Bekir UĞUR
1988
Konya
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
83.
29970/20
Kenben v. Türkiye
25/06/2020
Osman KENBEN
1992
İstanbul
Turkish
Hurşit KENBEN
84.
30009/20
Özen v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Mehmet ÖZEN
1975
Konya
Turkish
Sefanur BOZGÖZ
85.
30118/20
Polat v. Türkiye
23/06/2020
Ahmet POLAT
1980
İzmir
Turkish
Nurullah TEKİN
86.
30681/20
Ançaza v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Halil İbrahim ANÇAZA
1969
Kocaeli
Turkish
Enes Malik KILIÇ
87.
31092/20
Çalışkan v. Türkiye
03/07/2020
Mehmet ÇALIŞKAN
1976
İzmir
Turkish
Özlem SUZAN
88.
31315/20
Polat v. Türkiye
06/07/2020
Yusuf POLAT
1971
Ankara
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
89.
31502/20
Çakmak v. Türkiye
09/07/2020
Abdulbaki ÇAKMAK
1987
Ankara
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
90.
31504/20
Bulcun v. Türkiye
14/07/2020
Tamer BULCUN
1976
Kırıkkale
Turkish
Muhammet Uğur DEMİRKAN
91.
32063/20
Kazan v. Türkiye
27/07/2020
Zübeyir KAZAN
1995
İstanbul
Turkish
92.
32952/20
Artantaş v. Türkiye
24/07/2020
Yasemin ARTANTAŞ
1990
İstanbul
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
93.
33282/20
Kavak v. Türkiye
23/07/2020
İsmail KAVAK
1983
İstanbul
Turkish
Nurullah YILDIRIM
94.
33405/20
İncebacak v. Türkiye
21/07/2020
Elif İNCEBACAK
1988
Çankırı
Turkish
Feyzullah ALTAŞ
95.
33601/20
Esgiyer v. Türkiye
17/06/2020
Hacı Mustafa ESGİYER
1981
Basselland
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
96.
33767/20
Altuntaş v. Türkiye
22/07/2020
Abdullah ALTUNTAŞ
1985
Ankara
Turkish
İsmail ALTUNTAŞ
97.
33856/20
Abbas v. Türkiye
29/07/2020
Ersin ABBAS
1993
Tokat
Turkish
Seher YETİSGEN
98.
34393/20
Çetin v. Türkiye
14/07/2020
Nurullah ÇETİN
1976
Kayseri
Turkish
Zehra KARAKULAK BOZDAĞ
99.
34693/20
Zengin v. Türkiye
16/07/2020
Yasin ZENGİN
1990
Elazığ
Turkish
Elif Süeda ÖZDEMİR
100.
34765/20
Doğanay v. Türkiye
17/07/2020
Ali DOĞANAY
1975
Konya
Turkish
101.
34783/20
Bedir v. Türkiye
17/07/2020
Mehmet BEDİR
1967
Çorum
Turkish
102.
34904/20
Çelik v. Türkiye
07/07/2020
Saniye ÇELİK
1975
Konya
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
103.
35674/20
Çakmak v. Türkiye
29/07/2020
Fatih ÇAKMAK
1991
Mersin
Turkish
Merve Vildan DUMAN
104.
35719/20
Karaçalıoğlu v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Hulusi KARAÇALIOĞLU
1967
Ankara
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
105.
35753/20
Işık v. Türkiye
04/08/2020
Mehmet IŞIK
1985
Adıyaman
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
106.
35889/20
Öngün v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Mustafa ÖNGÜN
1980
Trabzon
Turkish
107.
36161/20
Pınar v. Türkiye
29/07/2020
Hasan Hüseyin PINAR
1977
Manisa
Turkish
Akkız KARDEŞLER
108.
38352/20
Akkuş v. Türkiye
17/08/2020
Yıldırım AKKUŞ
1974
Bursa
Turkish
Ebubekir RENK
109.
38459/20
Yildiz v. Türkiye
12/08/2020
İsa YILDIZ
1978
Adana
Turkish
Belma KAYRAN
110.
39043/20
Büyüköz v. Türkiye
18/08/2020
Muammer BÜYÜKÖZ
1990
Yozgat
Turkish
Yakup ŞAHİN
111.
39961/20
Bal v. Türkiye
25/08/2020
Mehmet BAL
1964
Bursa
Turkish
112.
41545/20
Taşboğaz v. Türkiye
01/09/2020
Eyüp TAŞBOĞAZ
1978
İstanbul
Turkish
Burak ÇAĞ
113.
41551/20
Acar v. Türkiye
28/08/2020
Kamil ACAR
1964
Uşak
Turkish
Halil ÇETİN
114.
41885/20
Yılmaz v. Türkiye
19/08/2020
Ferhat YILMAZ
1981
Giresun
Turkish
Murat YILMAZ
115.
42199/20
Kaya v. Türkiye
03/09/2020
Rıdvan KAYA
1993
Antalya
Turkish
Nurgül YAYMAN YILMAZ
116.
43040/20
Taymaz v. Türkiye
15/09/2020
Seyit Ahmet TAYMAZ
1974
Ankara
Turkish
Bekir DÖNMEZ
117.
43099/20
Kurşun v. Türkiye
10/09/2020
Günal KURŞUN
1975
Ankara
Turkish
Özlem YILDIZ
118.
43205/20
Tuşan v. Türkiye
18/09/2020
Zülfükar TUŞAN
1985
Hatay
Turkish
Esma TUŞAN
119.
43230/20
Aydın v. Türkiye
15/09/2020
Bekir AYDIN
1975
Konya
Turkish
Güliz Rabia TEKİN
120.
43239/20
Şimşek v. Türkiye
11/09/2020
Nejdet ŞİMŞEK
1973
Sivas
Turkish
Büşra KURT KÜÇÜK
121.
43660/20
Güneri v. Türkiye
24/09/2020
Erol GÜNERI
1985
Balıkesir
Turkish
122.
43990/20
Likoğlu v. Türkiye
16/09/2020
Fatih LİKOĞLU
1979
Afyonkarahisar
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
123.
44002/20
Polat v. Türkiye
15/09/2020
Bünyamin POLAT
1980
Eskişehir
Turkish
Hüseyin Mahir ERDOĞMUŞ
124.
44088/20
Yüksel v. Türkiye
03/09/2020
Mehmet YÜKSEL
1987
Gaziantep
Turkish
Murat İLHAN
125.
44928/20
Kara v. Türkiye
21/09/2020
Ender KARA
1974
Manisa
Turkish
Asım Burak GÜNEŞ
126.
45251/20
Yiğit v. Türkiye
02/10/2020
İrfan YİĞİT
1978
Balıkesir
Turkish
Vildan YİĞİT
127.
45836/20
Dokuz v. Türkiye
30/09/2020
Abdullah DOKUZ
1987
Niğde
Turkish
Rabiye DOKUZ
128.
46468/20
Can v. Türkiye
08/10/2020
Turan CAN
1982
Düzce
Turkish
Coşkun TAŞKIN
129.
46879/20
Çoban v. Türkiye
08/10/2020
Fatih ÇOBAN
1982
Aydın
Turkish
İshak IŞIK
130.
47307/20
Kör v. Türkiye
14/10/2020
Hüseyin KÖR
1991
Çorum
Turkish
Kazım DEMİR
131.
47348/20
Polat v. Türkiye
13/10/2020
Sedat POLAT
1975
Adana
Turkish
Akil SIRKINTI
132.
47378/20
Kanat v. Türkiye
12/10/2020
Orhan KANAT
1971
Kütahya
Turkish
Memnune Melike AKYILDIZ
133.
47622/20
Şenyurt v. Türkiye
22/10/2020
Şenol ŞENYURT
1984
İstanbul
Turkish
134.
47812/20
Gülek v. Türkiye
16/10/2020
Gökay Ersel GÜLEK
1974
İstanbul
Turkish
Şahin BULUT
135.
47814/20
Kurt v. Türkiye
19/10/2020
Ali KURT
1973
Sivas
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
136.
48952/20
Emeç v. Türkiye
28/08/2020
Hüseyin EMEÇ
1988
Hatay
Turkish
137.
48982/20
Kanak v. Türkiye
20/10/2020
Süleyman KANAK
1976
Mersin
Turkish
Burcu HAS
138.
49075/20
Toruk v. Türkiye
27/10/2020
Mevlüt TORUK
1959
Bolu
Turkish
Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ
139.
50616/20
Akan v. Türkiye
23/10/2020
İsmail Deniz AKAN
1990
Samsun
Turkish
140.
50844/20
Abanoz v. Türkiye
05/11/2020
Celal ABANOZ
1992
Trabzon
Turkish
Orçun MUŞLU
141.
51010/20
Şahin v. Türkiye
02/11/2020
Seyfullah ŞAHİN
1990
Yozgat
Turkish
Hülya ŞAHİN
142.
51256/20
Çelen v. Türkiye
04/11/2020
Bilal ÇELEN
1990
İstanbul
Turkish
Emrullah POLAT
143.
51444/20
Oruç v. Türkiye
04/11/2020
Özkan ORUÇ
1975
İzmir
Turkish
Safiye YILMAZ
144.
51510/20
Keklik v. Türkiye
05/11/2020
Ömür KEKLİK
1985
Malatya
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
145.
51814/20
Tutal v. Türkiye
09/11/2020
Cahit TUTAL
1980
Konya
Turkish
146.
51915/20
Uçar v. Türkiye
17/09/2020
Fikret UÇAR
1981
Kayseri
Turkish
147.
52181/20
Özsarı v. Türkiye
24/06/2020
İbrahim ÖZSARI
1992
Karabük
Turkish
148.
52221/20
Duran v. Türkiye
09/11/2020
İsmet DURAN
1967
Konya
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
149.
52331/20
Kara v. Türkiye
26/10/2020
Fikret KARA
1975
Kırıkkale
Turkish
150.
52597/20
Çınar v. Türkiye
16/11/2020
Kadir ÇINAR
1978
Kahramanmaraş
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
151.
52743/20
Yalçın v. Türkiye
17/11/2020
Mustafa YALÇIN
1980
Zonguldak
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
152.
52952/20
Bal v. Türkiye
21/07/2020
Ahmet BAL
1973
Konya
Turkish
Mehmet ÖNCÜ
153.
53047/20
Erdoğdu v. Türkiye
27/11/2020
Necmi ERDOĞDU
1973
Adana
Turkish
Safiyye Nur SABUNCU KARAKURT
154.
53162/20
İncebacak v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Yüksel İNCEBACAK
1988
Kastamonu
Turkish
Feyzullah ALTAŞ
155.
54849/20
Önce v. Türkiye
15/10/2020
Kemal ÖNCE
1978
Adana
Turkish
156.
55290/20
Çiftçi v. Türkiye
30/11/2020
Turgay ÇİFTÇİ
1974
Kocaeli
Turkish
Enes Malik KILIÇ
157.
55510/20
Gün v. Türkiye
24/11/2020
Ramazan GÜN
1985
Konya
Turkish
Leyla MESUTOĞLU
158.
41/21
Pakır v. Türkiye
03/12/2020
Abdullah PAKIR
1971
Konya
Turkish
159.
1202/21
Ciğerci v. Türkiye
18/12/2020
Zafer CİĞERCİ
1979
Kayseri
Turkish
160.
1386/21
Aydemir v. Türkiye
26/11/2020
Gültekin AYDEMİR
1981
İstanbul
Turkish
161.
1622/21
Atasever v. Türkiye
22/12/2020
Ramazan ATASEVER
1992
Bursa
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
162.
1916/21
Gündüz v. Türkiye
21/12/2020
İbrahim GÜNDÜZ
1984
Kocaeli
Turkish
Enes Malik KILIÇ
163.
1969/21
Karaduman v. Türkiye
22/12/2020
Levent KARADUMAN
1974
İstanbul
Turkish
164.
2000/21
Bat v. Türkiye
10/12/2020
Suphi BAT
1973
İstanbul
Turkish
165.
2344/21
Durmaz v. Türkiye
25/12/2020
Cüneyt DURMAZ
1978
Ankara
Turkish
166.
2526/21
Mirici v. Türkiye
24/12/2020
Şahin MİRİCİ
1958
Mersin
Turkish
167.
3082/21
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
30/12/2020
Hüseyin BOZKURT
1989
Mersin
Turkish
Adnan ZEYBEK
168.
3107/21
Tokatlı v. Türkiye
16/12/2020
Mehmet TOKATLI
1978
Ankara
Turkish
169.
3196/21
Kaya v. Türkiye
08/12/2020
Hasan KAYA
1978
İstanbul
Turkish
170.
3454/21
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
28/12/2020
Selçuk BOZKURT
1986
İstanbul
Turkish
171.
3606/21
Kodal v. Türkiye
23/12/2020
Ahmet KODAL
1989
Ordu
Turkish
Hamide Nur ALKAÇ
172.
3867/21
Gökmen v. Türkiye
30/12/2020
Bilgin GÖKMEN
1971
Ankara
Turkish
Zeynep Sena GÖKMEN
173.
3891/21
Bozkurt v. Türkiye
31/12/2020
Mustafa BOZKURT
1974
İzmir
Turkish
Ahmet Selim BURAK
174.
4313/21
Hacımustafaoğlu v. Türkiye
30/12/2020
Hasan HACIMUSTAFAOĞLU
1981
Bartin
Turkish
Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ
175.
6002/21
Şahin v. Türkiye
07/01/2021
İzzet ŞAHİN
1977
Kocaeli
Turkish
İrem TATLIDEDE
176.
6115/21
Yoldaş v. Türkiye
25/08/2020
Hamit YOLDAŞ
Giresun
Turkish
177.
7448/21
Salbaş v. Türkiye
28/01/2021
Hasan SALBAŞ
1988
Bolu
Turkish
Said İsmail TÜRKOĞLU
178.
7862/21
Özcan v. Türkiye
28/01/2021
Faruk ÖZCAN
1980
Hakkari
Turkish
Seyhan DEMİR
179.
8613/21
Şahin v. Türkiye
26/01/2020
Gül Ahmet ŞAHİN
1975
Ankara
Turkish
Mustafa SOYLU
180.
8879/21
Buğdaylıgil v. Türkiye
02/02/2021
Himmet BUĞDAYLIGIL
1960
İzmir
Turkish
Seçkin KESKİN
181.
9312/21
Kırtay v. Türkiye
09/12/2020
Cuma Gökhan KIRTAY
1991
Mersin
Turkish
Abdullah KIRTAY
182.
9428/21
Çakmak v. Türkiye
21/01/2021
Dursun ÇAKMAK
1978
Konya
Turkish
Şeyma ALKAN
183.
9763/21
Dal v. Türkiye
11/02/2021
Mustafa DAL
1979
İzmir
Turkish
Halil ÇETİN
184.
9942/21
Ağaçdan v. Türkiye
03/12/2020
Ebubekir AĞAÇDAN
1992
Ankara
Turkish
Naciye Refia ÇOKER
185.
11322/21
Çalış v. Türkiye
04/12/2020
Hamit ÇALIŞ
1973
Uşak
Turkish
Burcu HAS
186.
12213/21
Canbolat v. Türkiye
11/02/2021
Hasan CANBOLAT
1971
Kayseri
Turkish
Hasan Hüseyin GEZGİN
187.
12500/21
Kaya v. Türkiye
09/01/2021
Aydın KAYA
1980
Ankara
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
188.
12986/21
Orhan v. Türkiye
04/03/2021
Hüseyin ORHAN
1967
Düzce
Turkish
Derya ORHAN
189.
13843/21
Çatkaya v. Türkiye
23/02/2021
Remzi ÇATKAYA
1985
Kars
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
190.
14559/21
Topcan v. Türkiye
04/03/2021
Cafer TOPCAN
1968
Aydın
Turkish
Orçun MUŞLU
191.
14583/21
Genç v. Türkiye
03/03/2021
Abdullah GENÇ
1992
Kırıkkale
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
192.
14885/21
Kaya v. Türkiye
08/07/2020
Orhan KAYA
1976
Rize
Turkish
Kadir ÖZTÜRK
193.
16689/21
Acar v. Türkiye
10/03/2021
İsmail ACAR
1971
Balçova
Turkish
194.
18714/21
Doğan v. Türkiye
25/03/2021
Şerafettin DOĞAN
1983
İstanbul
Turkish
Sümeyye Sema COŞAN
195.
19144/21
İnci v. Türkiye
01/04/2021
Ahmet İNCİ
1990
Adıyaman
Turkish
Gülnihal YILMAZ
196.
21770/21
Gündoğdu v. Türkiye
05/04/2021
Mustafa GÜNDOĞDU
1980
Manisa
Turkish
Fatma BABAYİĞİT
197.
22115/21
Çete v. Türkiye
16/04/2021
Mehmet ÇETE
1975
İzmir
Turkish
198.
24675/21
Uyanık v. Türkiye
07/05/2021
İbrahim Emre UYANIK
1984
Bursa
Turkish
199.
26131/21
Demir v. Türkiye
22/04/2021
Şinasi DEMİR
1978
Zonguldak
Turkish
200.
36015/21
Yalçın v. Türkiye
02/07/2021
Rahmetullah YALÇIN
1975
Antalya
Turkish
Serra YAĞMUR ERGÜÇ
201.
36762/21
Çandik v. Türkiye
07/07/2021
Yasin ÇANDİK
1976
ALTINDAG / ANKARA
Turkish
Muhammed Mustafa GÜRSOY
202.
37266/21
Karakoç v. Türkiye
13/07/2021
Hasan KARAKOÇ
1973
Kırıkkale
Turkish
203.
38533/21
Karapınar v. Türkiye
01/07/2021
Kürşat Turan KARAPINAR
1989
İstanbul
Turkish
Emre AKARYILDIZ
204.
38710/21
Ersöyleyen v. Türkiye
24/06/2021
Zekeriya ERSÖYLEYEN
1990
Kayseri
Turkish
Ayşe AYAZMA
205.
39726/21
Pehlivan v. Türkiye
04/08/2021
Zafer PEHLİVAN
1970
Kırşehir
Turkish
Ayşenur Banu PEHLİVAN
206.
39745/21
Adam v. Türkiye
16/07/2021
Abdülmecit ADAM
1987
Gaziantep
Turkish
Bülent Seçkin DÜZTAŞ
207.
43989/21
Baktır v. Türkiye
09/08/2021
Ahmet Beyhan BAKTIR
1988
Kayseri
Turkish