FIRST SECTION
CASE OF SKOROKHODOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 38070/21 and 27 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
18 January 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Skorokhodov and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Péter Paczolay, President,
Gilberto Felici,
Raffaele Sabato, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 14 December 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
JURISDICTION6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, § 489, 7 February 2017, Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 179-91, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
REMAINING COMPLAINTS14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention. In view of the findings in paragraphs above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
Decides to join the applications;Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under the Convention raised by the applicants;Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);Holds(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 January 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant’s name
Year of birth
Representative’s name and location
Name of the public event
Location
Date
Administrative charges (code of administrative offences, CAO)
Penalty
Final domestic decision
Court Name
Date
Other complaints under well-established case-law
Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage (in euros)[1]
38070/21
14/07/2021
Nikita Valeryevich SKOROKHODOV
1996
Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
12/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.40 a.m. on 31/01/2021 to 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 12/03/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
38179/21
16/07/2021
Filipp Freddiyevich KADENA
1996
Memorial Human Rights Centre
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Moscow City Court
26/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.22 p.m. on 02/02/2021 to 6.57 a.m. on 03/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 26/04/2021.
4,000
41042/21
23/07/2021
Timofey Nikitich SOLOVOV
2000
Tevosov Georgiy Eduardovich
Moscow
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
03/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 7 days
Moscow City Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 00.15 p.m. on 03/02/2021 to 04/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 30/03/2021.
5,000
41079/21
28/07/2021
Daniil Antonovich SHESTAKOV
1997
Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna
Barnaul
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Perm
23/01/2021
Rally (march) in support of Mr Navalnyy
Perm
31/01/2021
Hybrid political rally (demonstration and march)
Perm
21/04/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 8 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
administrative detention of 10 days
Perm Regional Court
13/04/2021
Perm Regional Court
03/09/2021
Perm Regional Court
30/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”:
- from 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 (few hours after the end of the rally) to 00.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up later; the applicant’s deprivation of liberty was not recorded in any way,
- from 1.40 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
- from 3.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021 to 23/04/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Perm City Court, 13/04/2021, 30/04/2021 and 03/09/2021,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
5,000
43685/21
16/08/2021
Fedor Konstantinovich KOLESNICHENKO
1995
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Moscow City Court
04/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 25/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case.
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 04/03/2021.
4,000
45063/21
02/09/2021
Anastasiya Aleksandrovna POPOVA
1992
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar, Komi Republic
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.55 p.m. to 9.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.
4,000
45070/21
09/08/2021
Varvara Yuryevna ZHARKAYA
1983
Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
administrative detention of 10 days
Moscow City Court
10/02/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 10/02/2021.
5,000
45707/21
26/08/2021
Aleksandra Olegovna VORONINA
1991
Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich
Vladivostok
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Vladivostok
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Primorye Regional Court
30/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.10 p.m. to 7.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 30/03/2021.
4,000
46123/21
10/09/2021
Sergey Valeryevich GOROKHOV
1974
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Volgograd
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Volgograd Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.45 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Volgograd Regional Court, 24/03/2021.
4,000
46221/21
10/09/2021
Konstantin Olegovich ZARUBA
1990
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021.
4,000
46427/21
03/09/2021
Vladislav Romanovich KACHEROV
2000
Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich
Krasnodar
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Krasnodar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 1 day
Krasnodar Regional Court
15/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 15/03/2021.
4,000
46699/21
17/09/2021
Yekaterina Mikhaylovna VANSLOVA
1990
Zadorozhnaya Mariya Aleksandrovna
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
18/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 18/03/2021.
4,000
47009/21
15/09/2021
Yelena Valeriyevna YEVSEYEVA
1977
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Saransk, Republic of Mordovia
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.30 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Mordovia Republic, 24/03/2021.
4,000
47891/21
07/09/2021
Sergey Nikolayevich DYADKIN
1969
Kosheleva Inna Viktorovna
Kirov
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kirov
23/01/2021
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kirov
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Kirov Regional Court
09/03/2021
Kirov Regional Court
25/05/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Kirov Regional Court, 09/03/2021 and 25/05/2021.
4,000
48359/21
23/09/2021
Denis Aleksandrovich TASKIN
1990
Valenkov Andrey Olegovich
Nizhniy Novgorod
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
24/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 3.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 24/03/2021.
4,000
49416/21
01/10/2021
Vladislav Kirillovich SHTUKATUROV
1997
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Ryazan
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Ryazan Regional Court
08/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 10.25 a.m. on 24/01/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Ryazan Regional Court, 08/04/2021.
4,000
49480/21
01/10/2021
Oleg Nikolayevich TOTSKIY
2002
Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich
Vilnius
Rally in support to Mr Navalnyy
Vladivostok
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Primorye Regional Court
12/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, while the said record was drawn up only on 01/03/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Primorye Regional Court, 12/04/2021.
4,000
49512/21
01/10/2021
Ron Igorevich DEYCH
2000
Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich
Vilnius
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court
07/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 12.05 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 02/02/2010, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court, 07/04/2021.
4,000
49677/21
16/09/2021
Angelina Vladimirovna BURDAKOVA
1994
Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich
Kazan
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Kazan
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic
31/03/2021
3,500
49679/21
17/09/2021
Yelena Vasilyevna GULINA
1968
Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich
Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
23/01/2021
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
12/05/2021
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decisions: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021 and12/05/2021
4,000
49714/21
17/09/2021
Kirill Alekseyevich FOKIN
1999
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
03/02/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.00 p.m. to 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021.
4,000
49723/21
17/09/2021
Galina Aleksandrovna LOGINOVSKIKH
1965
Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich
Syktyvkar
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Supreme Court of the Komi Republic
17/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.45 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Supreme Court of the Komi Republic, 17/03/2021
4,000
50084/21
24/09/2021
Ilya Andreyevich YUDIN
1993
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Samara
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
administrative detention of 7 days
Samara Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 9.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant’s administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Samara Regional Court, 01/04/2021.
5,000
50105/21
21/09/2021
Yekaterina Yuryevna SURIKOVA
2002
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 15,000
Moscow City Court
22/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.15 p.m. to 10.15 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/03/2021.
4,000
50477/21
29/09/2021
Yevgeniy Sergeyevich DRUSHCHENKO
1990
Vertegel Feliks Yevgenyevich
Krasnodar
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Krasnodar
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 10,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
31/03/2021
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 31/03/2021.
3,500
50671/21
29/09/2021
Daniil Vladimirovich PROKOPENKO
1991
Dubrovina Marina Alekseyevna
Novorossiysk
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Anapa
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
fine of RUB 18,000
Krasnodar Regional Court
29/03/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.50 p.m. to 8.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Krasnodar Regional Court, 29/03/2021.
4,000
50901/21
01/10/2021
Andrey Konstantinovich ROMANOV
1998
Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna
Kolomna
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Moscow
23/01/2021
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
community works of 30 hours
Moscow City Court
22/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Moscow City Court, 22/04/2021.
5,000
50963/21
30/09/2021
Aleksandr Yuryevich PESKOV
1996
Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich
Balashikha
Rally in support of Mr Navalnyy
Cherepovets
31/01/2021
article 20.2 § 2 of CAO
fine of RUB 20,000
Vologda Regional Court
01/04/2021
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 11.55 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - final decision: Vologda Regional Court, 01/04/2021,
4,000
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.